Politics The Trump Crazy Train! (5 Viewers)

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[PCmor7]

Steve Kornacki with supporting reasoning why Iowa now is in play. Also the Publicans hold four House seats, two of which the Dems lead outside the margin of error and one of which the GOP candidate leads within the margin of error.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

The crowd looks so excited to be there.

 

[PCmor7]

 

[MickZagger]

They’ve endorsed her because they think your daddies a dipshit

 

[crandc]

Don Jr. really likes rapists.

 

[Phatguysrule]

Don Jr. really likes rapists.

They're like... Family...

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Oh god, hilarious!

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[jonnyboy]

Facts.

 

[jonnyboy]

Do Democrats conflate the words “immigrant” and “illegal immigrant” on purpose to trick their low IQ, low information voting base?

Jk, we all know the answer.

 

[barfo]

The trolling seems a little desperate this morning.

barfo

 

[Chris Craig]

The trolling seems a little desperate this morning.

barfo

But, barfo, they are owning us

 

[crandc]

I love Rachel.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[Chris Craig]

Depends on your definition of speaking

 

[crandc]

Please give me a brief speech.

 

[MickZagger]

Please give me a brief speech.

and preferably don’t fellate a microphone.

 

[beast blazer]

Hmm, maybe we should pack the court. This could bring about healing, with a bi-partisan effort. What say you?

 

[barfo]

Hmm, maybe we should pack the court. This could bring about healing, with a bi-partisan effort. What say you?

1. You already did.
2. You didn't read the bill, it doesn't say what you think it says.

barfo

 

[beast blazer]

1. You already did.
2. You didn't read the bill, it doesn't say what you think it says.

barfo

Um, packing the court means to add justices, which is precisely what this bill proposes. Trump did not pack the courts in his term, so I think this should be one his first orders of business. Many on the left have been calling for this.

 

[barfo]

Um, packing the court means to add justices, which is precisely what this bill proposes. Trump did not pack the courts in his term, so I think this should be one his first orders of business. Many on the left have been calling for this.

People often use "court packing" to describe changes to the size of the Supreme Court, but it's better understood as any effort to manipulate the Court's membership for partisan ends. A political party that's engaged in court packing will usually violate norms that govern who is appointed (e.g., only appoint jurists who respect precedent) and how the appointment process works (e.g., no appointments during a presidential election).

Seen from this perspective, the Barrett appointment is classic court packing. The president nominated a hardline conservative who appears to question major parts of U.S. constitutional law. And the Senate majority changed its procedural rules – invented to deny Merrick Garland a hearing – to ram through the nomination as people were voting.

So, as I mentioned... you already did some court packing.
Also, you clearly did not read the bill, even after I gave you the hint that maybe you should.

barfo