wizenheimer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 25,114
- Likes
- 38,214
- Points
- 113
for me, the big picture is this:
Curry 30
Dame 28
Klay 28
Green 28
CJ 27
Nurkic 24
the Warriors aren't going to be fading in Dame's prime. They are going to be great for the next 4 or 5 years. I don't want to hear stuff about Zach or Simons. Role players are not core stars.
all that wouldn't be too discouraging if the Blazers were something like 6-11 or 7-11 against the Warriors the last 3 times they've faced them in the playoffs. But Portland is 1-11 and the one win came when Curry didn't play. IMO, there's simply not enough room for Blazer organic growth to close the gap enough to change the situation. And that's even assuming a healthy Nurkic. Right now, Golden State is Portland's kryptonite, and I can't see a realistic path thru them for the Blazers.
maybe that's a bit of overreaction; I mean, it's not like we won't see some good Blazer basketball over the next few years
Curry 30
Dame 28
Klay 28
Green 28
CJ 27
Nurkic 24
the Warriors aren't going to be fading in Dame's prime. They are going to be great for the next 4 or 5 years. I don't want to hear stuff about Zach or Simons. Role players are not core stars.
all that wouldn't be too discouraging if the Blazers were something like 6-11 or 7-11 against the Warriors the last 3 times they've faced them in the playoffs. But Portland is 1-11 and the one win came when Curry didn't play. IMO, there's simply not enough room for Blazer organic growth to close the gap enough to change the situation. And that's even assuming a healthy Nurkic. Right now, Golden State is Portland's kryptonite, and I can't see a realistic path thru them for the Blazers.
maybe that's a bit of overreaction; I mean, it's not like we won't see some good Blazer basketball over the next few years
