Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All inexperienced. Not sure if that's good or bad. I'm leaning toward bad.
Define inexperienced.
James Capers is in his 19th season, Zarba his 11th, and Phillips his 16th, I believe. Seems like a good amount of experience there. Over 2700 games reffed between the 3 of them.
Ha ha! Ya, obviously not inexperienced.
It sure as hell sounds like you are.All we have to do is look at what happened with Golden State in Game Two. They were getting jobbed and they quit playing. As a result, they were embarrassed by the Clips and now LAC has the mental advantage going into Game Three.
We're going to have to react differently than did the Warriors. There's a good chance it will be a flop-a-thon on one end and nothing but uncalled elbows to the gut on the other. We have to persevere. The refs can job us, they can put us in foul trouble, but they don't have the power to stop us from playing our game or to keep fighting.
I think Houston looks at us and is a bit demoralized. They were up on us double digits in the second and fourth quarters, and we kept coming back. Most other teams would have rolled over and died. We didn't. We were down six in OT and came back. We lost LA and Lillard took over. If we keep up that fight, I think Houston isn't mentally strong enough to keep fighting back.
The best teams play like the opponent doesn't matter. We don't adjust to them, we force them to adjust to us. And if the foul calls get out of control, then Stotts needs to pull a Popovich and get himself tossed. Triano or Vanterpool need to be prepared to step up.
Bottom line, I think we're ready.


While the last two days Houston has been focusing on the calls and placing the blame of their loss on the officiating. We have been focused on us and what we need to do to dismantle an already fragile Houston team.
Personal fouls called, home minus visitor, and above/below average:
Zarba:-.9(visitors .9 more fouls per game called). .9 above average.
Capers -2.6, 1.0 BELOW average
Phillips -.9, .9 above average.
For their careers, in games they have reffed, the home team has a winning % of .604 for Phillips(.005 above average), Capers at .621 (.051 above average), and Zarba .547 (.105 BELOW average). xObviously, the averages are different for each ref, since they have reffed a different amount of seasons.
In the playoffs, Zarba is .12 above average, Caper .01 above, and Phillips -.001.
For FTA, home versus road, in the playoffs, home teams are a +1.7 for Phillis, which is 1.3 below average, for his career.
Capers, +4.4, which is 2.1 above average
Zarba, +1.0, which is 2.0 BELOW average.
Personal fouls called, home minus visitor, and above/below average:
Zarba:-.9(visitors .9 more fouls per game called). .9 above average.
Capers -2.6, 1.0 BELOW average
Phillips -.9, .9 above average.
Seems to me many of our fans, not out players, but a lot of our fans are already looking at the refs as a built in excuse for game 2.
For their careers, in games they have reffed, the home team has a winning % of .604 for Phillips(.005 above average), Capers at .621 (.051 above average), and Zarba .547 (.105 BELOW average). xObviously, the averages are different for each ref, since they have reffed a different amount of seasons.
In the playoffs, Zarba is .12 above average, Caper .01 above, and Phillips -.001.
For FTA, home versus road, in the playoffs, home teams are a +1.7 for Phillis, which is 1.3 below average, for his career.
Capers, +4.4, which is 2.1 above average
Zarba, +1.0, which is 2.0 BELOW average.
Personal fouls called, home minus visitor, and above/below average:
Zarba:-.9(visitors .9 more fouls per game called). .9 above average.
Capers -2.6, 1.0 BELOW average
Phillips -.9, .9 above average.
Great that these numbers are available, but there are just so many variables that aren't considered when you look at them in a vacuum. And tbh, I don't see much statistical significance to really say that there's a trend. I'd like to see some error calculations too, but even then, it doesn't tell me anything about a ref possibly pandering to home crowds.
Blazers fans are like Cubs fans... the always think they are going to get jobbed because they are a fan of their team specifically.
Or, because we've faced the L*kers so many times in the playoffs.
This isn't baseball or football; you know as well as I do that the NBA doesn't always ref games straight up.
For their careers, in games they have reffed, the home team has a winning % of .604 for Phillips(.005 above average), Capers at .621 (.051 above average), and Zarba .547 (.105 BELOW average). xObviously, the averages are different for each ref, since they have reffed a different amount of seasons.
In the playoffs, Zarba is .12 above average, Caper .01 above, and Phillips -.001.
For FTA, home versus road, in the playoffs, home teams are a +1.7 for Phillis, which is 1.3 below average, for his career.
Capers, +4.4, which is 2.1 above average
Zarba, +1.0, which is 2.0 BELOW average.
Personal fouls called, home minus visitor, and above/below average:
Zarba:-.9(visitors .9 more fouls per game called). .9 above average.
Capers -2.6, 1.0 BELOW average
Phillips -.9, .9 above average.
"Must Spread Rep Around"
will someone pick up RR7 for me please? I will give you rep as a result.
Great stuff RR7!
They don't but I don't think it's intentional conspiracy. I think ref get caught up in the fan enthusiasm.
