wizenheimer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 24,952
- Likes
- 37,963
- Points
- 113
Because Julius Randle is horrible. Hes a bad shooter, inefficient scorer, and a worse defender than C.J... Payton is horrible and doesnt do anything well.
a bit of excess hyperbole there
* in terms of TS%, Randle actually has a higher career TS% than CJ; mainly because he gets to the FT line at a much higher rate: career FT rate of .394 vs CJ's .167. So, your contention that Randle is an inefficient scorer would only be correct if you also claimed CJ was an inefficient scorer too. They both are around the NBA average though in terms of TS%. Randle is a big, and he's assisted on more of his FG's so it's probably fair to give him some demerits because of those things
the biggest problem Randle has, in terms of efficiency, is he went from averaging 0.5 attempted three's a game in 2018 to 3.6/game this season; and he's a shitty 3 point shooter. So, either he's an out of control chucker, or he's been getting bad coaching; or maybe both.
Randle is a good rebounder though. As for him being a worse defender than CJ: what I see is over the last couple of seasons, Randle has posted a defensive rating about 1 point better than his teams while CJ has posted a defensive rating about 3 points worse. So, if you're trading for either player for their defense, you're likely a terrible GM
**********************************************
Payton definitely is an inefficient shooter. He's about as "horrible" as Evan Turner, maybe worse. He's a perimeter player you don't want shooting the ball, and that's disadvantage, offense.
But Payton IS good as a facilitator. Per 36, he has averaged 8 assists ve 3 turnovers. That's a 2.7 assist/turnover ratio which is good for a PG. He's also a sold rebounder from the PG position
***********************************************
those things said, yeah, that would be a poor trade for the Blazers. They would lose more than they gain
sorry about the paragraphs