Trade Ideas Thread (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Status
Not open for further replies.
yuyuza1 said:
Would you take a chance on Boogie?

It would have to be a S&T.
Click to expand...

For CJ? Only if I knew Cousins would get back to his best. I don't know that.

BTW I think Philly are getting both Leonard and LeBron this offseason. Going to be nuts.
 
Sarni said:
For CJ? Only if I knew Cousins would get back to his best. I don't know that.

BTW I think Philly are getting both Leonard and LeBron this offseason. Going to be nuts.
Click to expand...
I don't think it would take CJ to get a rehabbing Cuz. He might not even play this upcoming season.
 
Sarni said:
For CJ? Only if I knew Cousins would get back to his best. I don't know that.

BTW I think Philly are getting both Leonard and LeBron this offseason. Going to be nuts.
Click to expand...

I'll bet pushups they get neither.
 
Labinot41 said:
We need a Backup PG if Napier leaves haha. Love Dennis as a Dame backupView attachment 20657
Click to expand...
Schroeder spells his name by including umlauts over the 'o'. Translating that into English means adding an 'e' after the vowel containing the umlauts. e.g. Schröder becomes Shroeder. Also, Germans pronounce that closer to shrooder rather than shrader.
 
Sarni said:
For CJ? Only if I knew Cousins would get back to his best. I don't know that.

BTW I think Philly are getting both Leonard and LeBron this offseason. Going to be nuts.
Click to expand...
Oh, I'm almost 100% certain that if Leonard gets traded, it'll be to Philadelphia. He's a perfect fit, and only making $20M so depending on the deal they could still have max cap space.

Any deal made would certainly center around Fultz. Fultz, Saric, Bayless, the 10th pick, the 26th pick, and maybe a future 1st is a very good package.

They get Leonard and then PG or LeBron.

Point Forward - Ben Simmons (6'10)
Point Forward - LeBron James (6'8)
Small Forward - Kawhi Leonard (6'7)
Small Forward - Robert Covington (6'9)
Center - Joel Embiid (7'1)

The size with that lineup is insane. The defensive switchability is at a whole new level, whether they have LeBron or Paul George.
 
Lanny said:
Schroeder spells his name by including umlauts over the 'o'. Translating that into English means adding an 'e' after the vowel containing the umlauts. e.g. Schröder becomes Shroeder. Also, Germans pronounce that closer to shrooder rather than shrader.
Click to expand...
In high school we had a zone defense called "Schroder". It was a weird, hybrid 1-2-2 / 1-3-1 zone. Never seen anything like it, and it worked wonders with athletic bigs (my senior year we had me and a big that could windmill dunk).

Balls up top - 1-2-2
Balls at FT-Line extended - Weakside wing drops down to weakside block, weakside posts comes up to defend strongside elbow.
Ball goes to corner - Big at the block goes out to defend corner, big at the elbow slides down to defend the block, strongside wing slides back to defend elbow, weakside wing stays down at the block ready to try to intercept a skip pass.

So one big had to cover the corner, block, opposite elbow, and opposite block.
 
BonesJones said:
Oh, I'm almost 100% certain that if Leonard gets traded, it'll be to Philadelphia. He's a perfect fit, and only making $20M so depending on the deal they could still have max cap space.

Any deal made would certainly center around Fultz. Fultz, Saric, Bayless, the 10th pick, the 26th pick, and maybe a future 1st is a very good package.

They get Leonard and then PG or LeBron.

Point Forward - Ben Simmons (6'10)
Point Forward - LeBron James (6'8)
Small Forward - Kawhi Leonard (6'7)
Small Forward - Robert Covington (6'9)
Center - Joel Embiid (7'1)

The size with that lineup is insane. The defensive switchability is at a whole new level, whether they have LeBron or Paul George.
Click to expand...

I think they offer Covington instead of Saric if they also offer Fultz and the pick. When Kawhi is traded it will not be for a massive haul considering his last year and his upcoming free agency. Saric stretches the floor better than Covington and is overall a much better player so I think they keep him.

Simmons, Kawhi, LeBron, Saric and Embiid is an insane lineup. Utterly insane.
 
Sarni said:
I think they offer Covington instead of Saric if they also offer Fultz and the pick. When Kawhi is traded it will not be for a massive haul considering his last year and his upcoming free agency. Saric stretches the floor better than Covington and is overall a much better player so I think they keep him.

Simmons, Kawhi, LeBron, Saric and Embiid is an insane lineup. Utterly insane.
Click to expand...
I think they would rather have Covington because they'd want switchability 1 through 4. Plus, San Antonio would rather have Saric.
 
BonesJones said:
I think they would rather have Covington because they'd want switchability 1 through 4. Plus, San Antonio would rather have Saric.
Click to expand...
Spurs position depends on how much they can get for Kawhi across the league. If you offer them Fultz (who I think will turn out to be great despite his early struggles) and a no. 10 pick that is probably already more than they are going to receive from most teams. Nobody is offering a haul for a player who seems problematic right now and whose fitness is not that certain, with one year remaining on his contract.
 
This is probably a bit of a stretch but I was trying to figure out a way to get both Khyri Thomas and Chandler Hutchison.

Atlanta gets: Caleb Swanigan (or Layman or PapaG work too if they don't want Swanigan), #24

Milwaukee gets: Aminu, Isaiah Taylor, #30

Portland gets: Dellavedova (Or Snell if the Bucks prefer), Miles Plumlee (TPE), #17, #19
 
hoopsjock said:
This is probably a bit of a stretch but I was trying to figure out a way to get both Khyri Thomas and Chandler Hutchison.

Atlanta gets: Caleb Swanigan (or Layman or PapaG work too if they don't want Swanigan), #24

Milwaukee gets: Aminu, Isaiah Taylor, #30

Portland gets: Dellavedova (Or Snell if the Bucks prefer), Miles Plumlee (TPE), #17, #19
Click to expand...
We get rid of our most versatile defender, and take on 2 more crap contracts to get 17, and move from 24-19? No thank you. That seems awful
 
RR7 said:
We get rid of our most versatile defender, and take on 2 more crap contracts to get 17, and move from 24-19? No thank you. That seems awful
Click to expand...
Yeah I know, that is why I said it was a bit of a stretch. Just trying to see what it would take to get both Khyri and Hutch.
 
I keep going back to the Philly trade because getting Jonah Bolden as our backup 4 to Collins allows us to move Aminu.

76ers get Rights to Milovan Rakovic

Blazers get Bayless, TLC (Both using the TPE), #26, and Rights to Bolden

Then make another move to get into the mid teens:

Bayless and #26 for Dellevadova (or Snell), and #17

From there we have three options:

Option 1: Hope Khyri Thomas is there at #17 and Hutchison is there at #24

Option 2: Harkless and Aminu to Washington for Mahinmi and #15

#15 Khyri Thomas, #17 Dzanan Musa, #24 Chandler Hutchison

Option 3: Harkless, Aminu, and #24 to NYK for Joakim Noah and #9

#9 Mikal Bridges, #17 Thomas, Musa, or Hutchison
 
Or how about this:

NYK gets #24, Aminu, Harkless, Layman/PapaG (non-guaranteed)

Portland gets #9, Joakim Noah, Lance Thomas, Courtney Lee (TPE)

Draft Mikal Bridges at #9.

Go after a vet like Trevor Ariza with the tax-MLE.

Offer to take TLC and Holmes off of the 76ers hands if they are just going to cut them anyway using the Vonleh TPE and a future 2nd if necessary.

Dame/CJ/Ariza/Collins/Nurk
Baldwin/Lee/Bridges/Thomas/Holmes
Turner/TLC/Swanigan/Leonard/Noah

Super crazy expensive but we added another top-10 pick to develop as a future SF stud while at the same time adding some veteran toughness with playoff experience in Lee and Ariza. The big contracts of Lee, Noah, Leonard, Thomas, and Turner would all expire in two years. Our 2nd unit is super athletic. The only real bad part would be having a shit ton of money in players that wouldn't even crack the rotation. Forcing Collins into a starting role could be good or bad as well. It couldn't be any worse than having Vonleh start though.
 
hoopsjock said:
Or how about this:

NYK gets #24, Aminu, Harkless, Layman/PapaG (non-guaranteed)

Portland gets #9, Joakim Noah, Lance Thomas, Courtney Lee (TPE)

Draft Mikal Bridges at #9.

Go after a vet like Trevor Ariza with the tax-MLE.

Offer to take TLC and Holmes off of the 76ers hands if they are just going to cut them anyway using the Vonleh TPE and a future 2nd if necessary.

Dame/CJ/Ariza/Collins/Nurk
Baldwin/Lee/Bridges/Thomas/Holmes
Turner/TLC/Swanigan/Leonard/Noah

Super crazy expensive but we added another top-10 pick to develop as a future SF stud while at the same time adding some veteran toughness with playoff experience in Lee and Ariza. The big contracts of Lee, Noah, Leonard, Thomas, and Turner would all expire in two years. Our 2nd unit is super athletic. The only real bad part would be having a shit ton of money in players that wouldn't even crack the rotation. Forcing Collins into a starting role could be good or bad as well. It couldn't be any worse than having Vonleh start though.
Click to expand...
wow. I keep seeing proposals for Bridges, and all of them are basically...let's spend a SHIT LOAD of money for Bridges. Again, i fhe was this good, he'd be going #1. I ran your moves through http://www.shamsports.com/capulator?id=17774783065afe51dcf1116239548843

Salary at 162.5 million. LT of 112 million!275 million dollars for that roster next year. If you're spending 275 million dollars on a team, like Paul would be, he'd wanna feel pretty confident he's got a team up there with GS, and this team...he adds Bridges, Ariza and Lee, loses Aminu and Harkless. That's not a 275 million dollar roster
 
RR7 said:
wow. I keep seeing proposals for Bridges, and all of them are basically...let's spend a SHIT LOAD of money for Bridges. Again, i fhe was this good, he'd be going #1. I ran your moves through http://www.shamsports.com/capulator?id=17774783065afe51dcf1116239548843

Salary at 162.5 million. LT of 112 million!275 million dollars for that roster next year. If you're spending 275 million dollars on a team, like Paul would be, he'd wanna feel pretty confident he's got a team up there with GS, and this team...he adds Bridges, Ariza and Lee, loses Aminu and Harkless. That's not a 275 million dollar roster
Click to expand...
Oh c'mon, it's only $155 million if Nurk signs for $15 million. That is totally reasonable!

First of all, we'd have to take on bad contracts to get into the top-10. Second of all, there are plenty of players that haven't gone #1 that turn out to be good.
 
hoopsjock said:
Oh c'mon, it's only $155 million if Nurk signs for $15 million. That is totally reasonable!

First of all, we'd have to take on bad contracts to get into the top-10. Second of all, there are plenty of players that haven't gone #1 that turn out to be good.
Click to expand...
Not gonna bother recalculating, it's a shit load of money to basically get the #9 pick. That cuts very little. Again, it's an absurd ask of Allen to commit to that amount, I don't care how much money he has, if it's for a similar or arguably worse roster. Especially in light of Olshey's recent comments about building for the playoffs. Yout hink the idea is spend 270 million for Bridges and no real thought of being much better this year?

I don't want to be someone that just comes in and shits on others ideas. I've posted bad ones myself, and I think for the RIGHT moves, Allen might pay that. For Bridges and success 3 years from now? Why speculate? Other than fans love the draft and the idea of something more than tangible success. Same with CJ for draft pick ideas. Come on now.
 
RR7 said:
Not gonna bother recalculating, it's a shit load of money to basically get the #9 pick. That cuts very little. Again, it's an absurd ask of Allen to commit to that amount, I don't care how much money he has, if it's for a similar or arguably worse roster. Especially in light of Olshey's recent comments about building for the playoffs. Yout hink the idea is spend 270 million for Bridges and no real thought of being much better this year?

I don't want to be someone that just comes in and shits on others ideas. I've posted bad ones myself, and I think for the RIGHT moves, Allen might pay that. For Bridges and success 3 years from now? Why speculate? Other than fans love the draft and the idea of something more than tangible success. Same with CJ for draft pick ideas. Come on now.
Click to expand...
My bad, I forgot Bridges rookie salary so it would be $158 million. We could skip the Lance Thomas part bringing it down to $151 million.
 
Hmm:
e423c00e-b80f-4233-9eb5-2677a8052647.png
 
hoopsjock said:
Without, we'd have Richaun Holmes at backup center with Noah and Leonard as the deep filler.
Click to expand...

I would pass as that lineup just doesn't do a lot for me for that kind of money. Bridges might be a good player for the future but a guy like Oubre or Tobias Harris might be available without breaking the bank.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top