cdub503
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2008
- Messages
- 1,863
- Likes
- 422
- Points
- 83
Even with all our olds guys we are still a very young team.
We are younger than both Houston & Cleveland and the 4th youngest in the league. Doesn't hurt to have a few vets on the team!
NBA Roster Survey: Facts to know for the 2023-24 seasonNBA.comhttps://www.nba.com › NBA News
I agree with this but I also think we could use high experience low usage vets of some sort, I like Grant but I think with his payday and no clear leader on the team hes taking a lot more shots and being asked to do a lot more than i think most here would like. I like brogdon too, but with the log jam at the guard spot I'd rather have Ant's floor spacing than brogdon's defense with the team that we currently have. If Ant could eventually be sold on coming off the bench that would be ideal, but chauncey is going to have to make that decision when he gets back, maybe its a easier sell with him coming back from an injury. I also think there is more of a market for brogdon at this point than Ant, but I would be open to trading ant if there was a good trade. I would also trade matisse, Love the guy and his attitude but he feels pretty un-needed at this point and id rather give minutes to camara, walker, shae at that spot anyways.
The real question is who would actually be interested in either Grant, Brogdon or matisse who have assets that we would want, most competing teams dont have assets we want and most non competing probably dont want/need them.... admittedly I dont know other teams rosters that well so maybe theres something out there that makes sense for everyone but seems like most of the ideas are somewhat lackluster, either in terms of draft compensation and or blue chip young players of need. Cronin is going to have his work cut out for him if he is to actually move these guys and go forward with the more youngins.