Politics Trump, in an Escalation, Calls for Republicans to ‘Nationalize’ Elections

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Dallas County, Texas, has used county wide voting since 2019. Meant a person could vote anywhere in the county.
Republicans changed the rules this year. People had to vote in their precinct. State web site that was supposed to inform voters where they should vote contained inaccurate information. People waited in long lines only to be told they were in wrong place. So a judge issued an emergency order allowing county voting in primary. Ken Paxton, ultra right attorney general and Republican candidate, late in the day, went to all Republican state Supreme Court to get order overturned. Thousands of Dallas County voters had their ballots moved to separate piles where they might or might not be counted. Thousands more turned away. One 60 year old lady walked two miles to vote and was told she was in wrong place. All this minutes before polls closed. No time to get to correct polling place even if they could figure out where it was.
A tight Democratic primary, Dallas County is Jasmine Crockett home turf. She had hoped strong support would close gap between herself and eventually winner James Talarico. Maybe, maybe not. But disenfranchising her voters makes it harder for him to win them over, creates division in Democratic party. And discourages voter turnout.

Call it a dress rehearsal for November. And 2028.
 
In South Dakota you’ll soon be able to challenge other voters’ citizenship

SOUTH Dakota residents will be allowed to challenge each other’s citizenship at the polls after the state passed new voting registration laws.

Republican Governor Larry Rhoden urged locals to take advantage of the massive change and protect “election integrity.”

The new law was one of six bills signed into law by the governor on Thursday.

The law amends the reasons for challenging an individual’s eligibility to vote.

State law already allows a voter’s registration to be challenged up to 90 days before an election if they’re suspected of not being a South Dakota resident.

The new law adds citizenship as a justification for challenging voter registration.

“If you find somebody who’s not a citizen and is trying to vote, then do something about it,” Thomas Deadrick, the deputy secretary of state, said during a legislative committee hearing, according to South Dakota Searchlight.

Rhoden said he hopes the new legislation will be an example to others across the US and urged lawmakers to take note.

“We do a lot of things right in South Dakota, and our election integrity is something to be admired and emulated by other states,” Rhoden said.

“I am proud to sign these bills into law and further strengthen the security, transparency, and trust in our election system.”

The law will go into effect on July 1, meaning it will not impact the primary election for governor set to take place on June 2.

Challenges can be filed by a voter in the same county, the South Dakota Secretary of State’s Office or an auditor in the county where the voter is registered.

Those challenging someone’s voter registration must file a signed, sworn statement and are required to include “documented evidence.”

If an auditor determines that the challenge is valid, the registrants are given a chance to provide documentation verifying their registration.

A South Dakotan may appeal to a court or their local county commission if their registration ultimately gets canceled by an auditor.

Democratic State Senator Liz Larson voted against the bill, raising concerns about the ramifications voters could face for challenging other voters’ citizenship, per South Dakota Searchlight.

Her concerns came after federal agents shot two US citizens in Minnesota during immigration enforcement actions.

Larson said that “in today’s environment,” the bill would just be “adding fuel to the fire.”

Melissa McCauley, a lobbyist for South Dakota Voices for Justice, an immigrant advocacy group, said the bill adds unnecessary layers of law and bureaucracy.

“There is no documented pattern of noncitizen voting, widespread residency fraud or double voting in South Dakota that current law cannot already address,” McCauley said, per South Dakota Searchlight.

The law’s passing comes as the SAVE America Act moves its way through Congress, which would require proof of US citizenship in order to register to vote.

Some of the acceptable documents voters could use to provide their proof of citizenship include a birth certificate plus a valid photo ID or a US passport.

The law would require voters to bring their photo ID to the polls. Those who vote by mail would need to provide a copy of their photo ID for their vote to count.

 
FBI raided Arizona election office looking for evidence 2020 election stolen. They were especially seeking results of "forensic audit", so called, conducted by pro Trump election denier group from Florida called Cyber Ninjas. Cyber Ninjas now defunct, very likely because after having been unlawfully given access to Arizona ballots they recounted and discovered Biden not only still won the state, he got 300 more votes than originally thought.
 
I bought gas yesterday. It was $5 a gallon. No one asked for ID.

On planet earth. Department of Homeland Security investigation division is supposed to investigate drug cartels and sex trafficking. Trump ordered them to investigate 2020 election. This isn't (just) craziness. It's rehearsal for 2026 and 2028. They are learning. How to take ballots. How voting machine works. Every case thrown out of court, they learn to avoid legal pitfalls. They are desperate. They know how unpopular they are.
 
I loathe Trump but please explain how voting machines were rigged.
 
Senate majority leader John Thune has been a strong defender of keeping filibuster rules intact. But he is in runoff for Republican Senate nomination with ultra MAGA right wing nut job fanatic Ken Paxton. Trump has pledged to endorse one of them and ask the other to drop out. So Thune, like a true Republican, threw out his principles for Trump. He now favors suspending filibuster rules so Senate can pass voter suppression and anti trans bill Trump calls highest priority.
 
I loathe Trump but please explain how voting machines were rigged.

From what I heard, the machines were manipulated via an upload to count only state races for some Democratic ballots. I.e. according to the counts, there were many ballots where people voted for everyone else down the line, except for the president.

Apparently, several of the voters behind these ballots say that they did indeed vote for president as well.
 
From what I heard, the machines were manipulated via an upload to count only state races for some Democratic ballots. I.e. according to the counts, there were many ballots where people voted for everyone else down the line, except for the president.

Apparently, several of the voters behind these ballots say that they did indeed vote for president as well.
I heard conspiracy theories about voting machines in 2004 from RFK Jr. He alleged machines were changing Kerry votes to Bush.
I heard more conspiracy theories about voting machines in 2020 to this day from Trumpers. Somehow thousands of extra votes for Biden. In over 60 legal actions zero proof. So I want really strong proof.
 
Many older, white rural voters do not have passports or drivers licenses and would be disenfranchised.
Newly naturalized citizens nearly always have passports.
 
Senate majority leader John Thune has been a strong defender of keeping filibuster rules intact. But he is in runoff for Republican Senate nomination with ultra MAGA right wing nut job fanatic Ken Paxton. Trump has pledged to endorse one of them and ask the other to drop out. So Thune, like a true Republican, threw out his principles for Trump. He now favors suspending filibuster rules so Senate can pass voter suppression and anti trans bill Trump calls highest priority.
Not Thune, but John Cornyn.

barfo
 


A Substack investigation claims Florida's 2024 election results were manipulated, based on two main findings:

  1. The Amendment 4 math — Florida's abortion rights amendment needed 60% to pass and fell just short at 57.2%. The writer argues the total "Yes" votes needed to hit exactly 60% matches the state's total early vote count for registered Republicans and Democrats to the exact digit — two figures that should have no relationship to each other.
  2. "Burke County" — A county that doesn't exist appeared in election night reporting feeds at 7:31pm containing approximately 6.3 million votes. The article argues the vote totals within it match Florida's early ballot figures exactly, and that the maths shows Harris's certified state total can be derived entirely from that vote bank.
  3. Before Election Day, Florida law requires all mail-in and early in-person votes to be entered into the Election Management System by 7pm on November 4th — the day before Election Day. This means the total early vote figure (6,371,645) was a known, fixed number sitting in the system before a single Election Day ballot was cast. What the article alleges happened Rather than real votes flowing in from Florida's 67 actual counties, the author argues that this pre-known total was loaded into a single fictional data entry — "Burke County" — and used as a pool to distribute votes between candidates in predetermined proportions.
  4. Think of it like a spreadsheet: instead of 67 rows of real county data adding up to a total, someone allegedly created one master row containing the answer they wanted, then worked backwards to make the individual county figures fit. Why "Burke County" matters When the article's author adds up all the presidential candidate votes attributed to Burke County and accounts for minor candidates, the total comes to exactly 6,371,645 — the same early vote figure. The argument is that this is statistically impossible by coincidence, because those two numbers should have no relationship to each other whatsoever.
The author concludes the results were predetermined and calls on state legislators and attorneys general to investigate. The article also references similar "ghost county" anomalies in swing states and draws a comparison to alleged Republican vote routing in the 2004 Ohio election.

What do you think?
 

EXCLUSIVE: Georgia election board reveals Elon Musk PAC committed voter fraud after discovering prefilled ballot applications​




Will it be a strongly worded letter?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top