Politics Trump Tower meeting with Russians 'treasonous', Bannon says in explosive book

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
SlyPokerDog said:
If what is being said is not true then you wouldn't say it was said off the record.

Here is the timeline from yesterday.

1. Details of new book about Trump Whitehouse is released.

2. WH says it's all lies. Everything made up.

3. Author says he has recordings.

4. WH says, recordings?!? Then everything was off the record.
Click to expand...
I don't care if this guy ruins his reputation. I wouldn't even tell people I interviewed that anything would be off the record. Maybe he didn't. All I'm saying is that off the record is being mentioned and people are surprised there are tapes. Sounds like a Project Veritas type of operation...and I'm fine with it. I'm not trying to censor him.

I want to know the truth at all times, which is why I don't like when you edit things here. If there's a bad word you could censor it and leave the intent.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
I don't care if this guy ruins his reputation. I wouldn't even tell people I interviewed that anything would be off the record. Maybe he didn't. All I'm saying is that off the record is being mentioned and people are surprised there are tapes. Sounds like a Project Veritas type of operation...and I'm fine with it. I'm not trying to censor him.

I want to know the truth at all times, which is why I don't like when you edit things here. If there's a bad word you could censor it and leave the intent.
Click to expand...

Calling someone a motherfucker doesn't mean it's true. It's just an insult and that's not allowed here.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
Calling someone a motherfucker doesn't mean it's true. It's just an insult and that's not allowed here.
Click to expand...
Yeah, fine. If I read a thread after the fact and the entire intent was edited out and not just the words how can I know what happened?

You're a (expletive deleted) makes sense.

An empty, gutted post followed by a nasty yet legal response makes the person responding look bad.
 
"Off the record" carries no legal protections--it's a gentleman's agreement that's important to honor in some cases and not in others. It's not like client-attorney privilege. If someone told a reporter, "This is off the record, but I have a plan in place to assassinate the President," it'd be ridiculous not to report it. Even serious news or observations relevant to the reporters' investigation that isn't criminal doesn't make sense "off the record." The only place "off the record" is appropriate is if someone wants to explain their thinking but doesn't want that thinking splashed across the news.

Unless we knew what parts were supposedly off the record (and we knew the person claiming it was is telling the truth), there's no way to know if the writer did something unethical or not.
 
The Constitutions explicitly states the president or vice president can be impeached for treason. In so many words. So clearly, yes, it is legally possible for a president or VP to be a traitor.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
Yeah, fine. If I read a thread after the fact and the entire intent was edited out and not just the words how can I know what happened?

You're a (expletive deleted) makes sense.

An empty, gutted post followed by a nasty yet legal response makes the person responding look bad.
Click to expand...

But the only rule we have against expletives is please don't post them in thread titles in the main forum. No personal insults is very simple. What you're proposing just gets all confusing. So it's okay to insult someone as long as you don't use an expletive? If you don't think a word is an expletive but someone else does then can one person use it and the other one can't? Fuck all that. No personal insults.

Edit: We do have some other rules about expletives like don't post the N word. Which would be nice if we didn't have to make rules like that because you think people wouldn't post crap like that but oh well... They do so we do.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
But the only rule we have against expletives is please don't post them in thread titles in the main forum. No personal insults is very simple. What you're proposing just gets all confusing. So it's okay to insult someone as long as you don't use an expletive? If you don't think a word is an expletive but someone else does then can one person use it and the other one can't? Fuck all that. No personal insults.

Edit: We do have some other rules about expletives like don't post the N word. Which would be nice if we didn't have to make rules like that because you think people wouldn't post crap like that but oh well... They do so we do.
Click to expand...
If I repeated a Chris Rock skit here and used the N word I'm being accurate. If I say Sinobas is the dumbest N word of all I'm being kinda racist but I thought he was white.
 
MarAzul said:
barf, I know you know, that is a piss poor analogy. Nixon ordering a break in and lying to everyone is a crime. Not the same in anyway as a President or his representive having discussions with foreign representative
Click to expand...

Nixon himself did not order the break-in, so far as I know. What he did do was try to cover up the crime of his staff afterwards.
Which is pretty much the same as here, except that the break-in was done by a hostile foreign government, and Trump tried to reward them for doing it, in addition to covering it up.

But in any case neither the crime you put forth or the discussions are treason.
Click to expand...

Smells a lot like treason, but if you want to call it conspiracy instead, that's ok with me.

barfo
 
dviss1 said:
Dems are winning in Alabama but their dead? :dunno:
Click to expand...

Nearly lost to an assumed pedophile.

Jones is a lame duck in a state that can't wait for his term to end already. He may face an impeachment campaign soon, or just get paid to accomplish nothing.

Either way, a huge embarrassment for the dying Dems.
 
barfo said:
Nixon himself did not order the break-in, so far as I know. What he did do was try to cover up the crime of his staff afterwards.
Which is pretty much the same as here, except that the break-in was done by Hillary Clinton, the DNC, a disgraced British spy, the FBI, and Loretta Lynch tried to excuse their crimes, in addition to covering it up.

Smells a lot like treason, but if you want to call it conspiracy instead, that's ok with me.

barfo
Click to expand...

fify
 
MARIS61 said:
Nearly lost to an assumed pedophile.
Click to expand...

Because of you white people. Good thing we saved those folks.

This says MUCH more about white Alabamians than it does Democrats. LOL.
 
DSpwZW_WsAM1l_P-e1515074400970.jpg
 
I saw a clip of Sarah Huckabee today.

Trump really needs to hire me to be press secretary.

My standard answer would be "who gives a shit?"

Unfortunately Trump can't help himself
 
barfo said:
True, and yet helping himself is all Trump knows how to do. It's a conundrum wrapped in a taco bowl wrapped in Ivanka's bra.

barfo
Click to expand...
Drizzled in a fascinating glaze of covfefe.
 
Whether you believe this was all meant to be off the record or that Steve Bannon is crazy and lying about everything, it's shocking he would make such a huge break with his 1%er friends. What was Bannon intending to do?!?!? And to just let this reporter sit around and overhear stuff if this wasn't intended to go public, I'm just blown away by the incompetence!

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...feud-as-mercer-family-cuts-backing/ar-BBHSSZU
 
MarAzul said:
:werd:
Click to expand...

Yup we as in Black people. Black women specifically. Pissed you off so bad you started a whole thread about the shit.

If you lived in Alabama you would've voted for the pedophile too. I'd have voted for *Edit: Jones.

America can thank us for our service in making sure we don't hire pedophiles in the south.
 
Last edited:
Cippy91 said:
Everybody was making a meme of Bannon and saying the worst things. Now people love him. Oh politics, you’re so great.

This is why I don’t fuck wth politics.
Click to expand...

I don't love Bannon suddenly; he's still a monster, but if Trump invaded hell I would make at least a favourable reference to the devil in the House of Commons.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
People dump dogs all the time. It infuriates me.

During the worst of the housing market in 07 people just left them in the back yards of houses to die.
Click to expand...
Yeah. It is still a huge problem in the south. In the Florida panhandle, it is a normal thing to just drop unwanted dogs off in the forest or swamp. That's why my sister has 5 dogs. She just kept finding them out in the swamps during her wildlife fieldwork. It's fucking disgusting.
 
theprunetang said:
Yeah. It is still a huge problem in the south. In the Florida panhandle, it is a normal thing to just drop unwanted dogs off in the forest or swamp. That's why my sister has 5 dogs. She just kept finding them out in the swamps during her wildlife fieldwork. It's fucking disgusting.
Click to expand...
All my pets have come upstream from the local transfer refuse station down the mountain....people drop them off there all the time.stream goes through my property...cougars get a lot of them...if it creeps you out...I don't recommend traveling in India....animals die in the streets mange ridden and starving...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top