magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
people still listen to MM spout his "sources"?
Muahaha
MM has sources? Better not be a janitor!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
people still listen to MM spout his "sources"?
Muahaha
no worries. I still haven't seen anything saying 12/14/16 or no ORL involvement. You could totally be right, but it hasn't been reported anywhere I've seen. Especially 5 hours ago.
no worries. I still haven't seen anything saying 12/14/16 or no ORL involvement. You could totally be right, but it hasn't been reported anywhere I've seen. Especially 5 hours ago.
a) we have our pick
b) we are rumored to get "multiple" picks
c) NJN was already offering 2 1sts to ORL for this
d) ORL is rumored to maybe sending theirs to us for Wallace.
There are 4 picks. If you don't think that one of NJN, ORL, HOU or POR will be in the conference finals, then that's 4 picks in the top 25.
Now that that's solved...
how many of the last 4 draft picks were considered the "best draft in the decade?"

And I'm pretty sure that in a retooling/rebuilding process we're not going with Eurostashes, so you can drop the faux outrage over Claver.
Rush is foolish since he was only picked to complete the trade to Indy for Bayless.
To be honest, your trading and/or drafting skills aren't at issue here.
4 1st rounders, even if immediately traded, are worth well more than an aging used-to-be-allstar SF on the downside of his career. Do I think he's a good player? Yes. Do I want him on the team? Of course. Am I keeping him for some faux sense that he's better than 4 cost-controlled first rounders in the deepest draft in a decade, at one-half the cap cost this summer and the same salary over the next 4 years (of which he'll play the next 18 months)? Hell no.
Chess. Not checkers.
We have talked about this before........ BUT HOW IN THE FUCK DO YOU PEOPLE HAVE TIME AT WORK TO CHAT ON HERE ALL DAY AND NOT GET FIRED!!!!!
so we could have had NJ 2018 #1? that draft is gonna be loaded!![]()
If by sick, you mean with a debilitating disease, then yeah, sounds like that's our target.Hey--there's a 7th grader in Delaware that I've been scouting for that draft. He's gonna be sick!
even with your reasoning (which I've seen posted nowhere, but whatever), what's your answer? A, or B?
We have talked about this before........ BUT HOW IN THE FUCK DO YOU PEOPLE HAVE TIME AT WORK TO CHAT ON HERE ALL DAY AND NOT GET FIRED!!!!!
Hey--there's a 7th grader in Delaware that I've been scouting for that draft. He's gonna be sick!
If by sick, you mean with a debilitating disease, then yeah, sounds like that's our target.
C. Re-sign Wallace.
Maybe Gerald will happily follow Marcus Camby's career arch and stay in rip city on a reasonable 2 or 3 year contract.
Rush is foolish since he was only picked to complete the trade to Indy for Bayless.
Digging really deep for excuses, and also making an assumption that you have no clue about.
Brandon Rush said:Brandon Rush was the first Kansas player to hear NBA commissioner David Stern call his name when the Portland Trailblazers selected him 13th overall. Rush wasn't a Trailblazer for long, though. Portland traded Rush to the Indiana Pacers shortly after. Rush said he anticipated the swap.
"My agent kind of told me about that when they called my name," Rush said on ESPN.
What would've been your probability in January 2010 that within 6 months, and with a boatload of Cap Space, SuperFriends would be in MIA?
I'm cool with that if we finally trade Batum. We need to get some value for Batum if are hitching our wagon to Wallace. Talk of Batum playing the 2 spot is a joke.
Rumors are dead... let this thread die also.
Miami and Portland just seem like two totally different destinations to me. I don't know why. Can't place my finger on it exactly.
Is your line of reasoning "Improbable things happen, so we should plan on something improbable happening for Portland"? Because that's the theme I get from your posts. You mention the fact that late-round gems are found in the draft, even though it was improbable for the team that found them, as reasoning why Portland should pick up non-top-ten draft picks. You mention that Miami, against precedent, signed two marquee free agents as reasoning why cap space should be attractive to Portland.
Yes, improbable things do happen from time to time. That doesn't mean they weren't improbable and it doesn't seem like a sound way to do future planning.
it was considered a possibility because miami had wade and tons of cap space, revisionism doesnt change that

