Uh oh!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Nikolokolus

There's always next year
Joined
Sep 19, 2008
Messages
30,704
Likes
6,198
Points
113
http://columbian.com/article/20091016/BLOGS05/910169997/-1/BLAZERBANTER

Sounds like trouble's brewing in Blazerland ...

They could have already split apart. Fractured. Taken two separate roads, neither of which point in the same direction.

But instead of falling away from each other, Portland Trail Blazers point guards Steve Blake and Andre Miller have become closer.

Both express mutual admiration, three weeks into the team's 2009-10 training camp. Both praise each other's distinctive traits, while offering reminders that whatever holes one has, the other will fill.

Blake and Miller are more alike than they are dissimilar; more comparable and complimentary than they are clashing.

Most importantly, Blake has Miller's back.

"I enjoy the differences that we have. He has a great understanding for the game," Blake said Wednesday. "You can always see that he's thinking, engaged in the game. He is a great finisher around the basket. He is a very good passer — you always see him looking for the open teammate. And so I think he brings a lot positive qualities to our team. I think he's going to help us a ton."

And Miller has Blake's.

"I support him in whatever he does. I enjoy passing to him. I enjoy playing off of him," Miller said minutes later the same day. "He's a shooter, he's a tough guy. And a lot of people don't see that. They criticize (him) for his defense or whatever — we all get criticized about something, you know. So, I see a competitive person that knows how to play basketball."

Tensions are running high at One Center Court.
 
why does there always have to be someone to stir the pot!? :ohno:
 
I don't know if I understand this post correctly. From the quote of your article link provided, it seems they are getting along and enjoy the other player. Why would that brew trouble?

sarcasm.

julius (a fully owned and operated subsidiary of barfo)
 
I like this part the best:

"I enjoy the differences that we have. He has a great understanding for the game," Blake said Wednesday. "You can always see that he's thinking, engaged in the game. He is a great finisher around the basket. He is a very good passer — you always see him looking for the open teammate.

The differences Steve sees in them: Andre has an understanding for the game, Steve...doesn't.
Andre is always thinking, Steve...isn't.
Andre is a very good passer, looking for open teammates. Steve looks for covered teammates, and in general is not a good passer.

I know that isn't what he means, just funny to look at the quote by itself. Basically, Steve is a clueless, disinterested PG who has no idea how to finish by the basket, wouldn't know an open teammate if they were to stand by his side, adn in general, is just a poor passer.

rr7
 
I like this part the best:



The differences Steve sees in them: Andre has an understanding for the game, Steve...doesn't.
Andre is always thinking, Steve...isn't.
Andre is a very good passer, looking for open teammates. Steve looks for covered teammates, and in general is not a good passer.

I know that isn't what he means, just funny to look at the quote by itself. Basically, Steve is a clueless, disinterested PG who has no idea how to finish by the basket, wouldn't know an open teammate if they were to stand by his side, adn in general, is just a poor passer.

rr7

I noticed you glazed over 3-point shooting there:devilwink:
 
I like this part the best:



The differences Steve sees in them: Andre has an understanding for the game, Steve...doesn't.
Andre is always thinking, Steve...isn't.
Andre is a very good passer, looking for open teammates. Steve looks for covered teammates, and in general is not a good passer.

I know that isn't what he means, just funny to look at the quote by itself. Basically, Steve is a clueless, disinterested PG who has no idea how to finish by the basket, wouldn't know an open teammate if they were to stand by his side, adn in general, is just a poor passer.

rr7

That's how journalists turn words.. tomorrow the headlines will read "Blake says Miller will make up for everything he lacks"

dpc
 
Last edited:
I was just quoting Steve. If I glazed over it, it's because he did.
 
I was just quoting Steve. If I glazed over it, it's because he did.

Ohh i wasn't bashing you lol, i think its hilarious Steve worded it like that. My point was its stupid that some reporters out there would take that quote and totally flip it around to make him look stupid or something.
 
I like this part the best:



The differences Steve sees in them: Andre has an understanding for the game, Steve...doesn't.
Andre is always thinking, Steve...isn't.
Andre is a very good passer, looking for open teammates. Steve looks for covered teammates, and in general is not a good passer.

I know that isn't what he means, just funny to look at the quote by itself. Basically, Steve is a clueless, disinterested PG who has no idea how to finish by the basket, wouldn't know an open teammate if they were to stand by his side, adn in general, is just a poor passer.

rr7

Well, to be a nitpicker, Blake's quote is missing a qualifier. "Such as" or "like" after the "differences" sentence would give the paragraph the meaning that you are reading. As for me, I read it as Blake making a sentence about undefined differences, and then listing some of Miller's strengths in the next sentence. :dunno:

"I enjoy the differences that we have, such as he has a great understanding for the game, and I don't," Blake said Wednesday. "You can always see that he's thinking, engaged in the game. He is a great finisher around the basket. He is a very good passer — you always see him looking for the open teammate.
 
Because the pot has brownies in it so we can eat it?

WHOA?! the pot has brownies IN IT?!

What if we took this brownie pot, and like made cookies, man?!

Then it would be like some sort of drug turkduckin:pimp:
 
Maybe this will help?

JOKE

Pronunciation: \ˈjōk\
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin jocus; perhaps akin to Old High German gehan to say, Sanskrit yācati he asks
Date: 1670
1 a : something said or done to provoke laughter; especially : a brief oral narrative with a climactic humorous twist b (1) : the humorous or ridiculous element in something (2) : an instance of jesting : kidding <can't take a joke> c : practical joke d : laughingstock
2 : something not to be taken seriously : a trifling matter <consider his skiing a joke — Harold Callender> —often used in negative constructions <it is no joke to be lost in the desert>

Now I know why you're in general a pain in the ass on here.

rr7
 
Maybe this will help?

JOKE

Pronunciation: \ˈjōk\
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin jocus; perhaps akin to Old High German gehan to say, Sanskrit yācati he asks
Date: 1670
1 a : something said or done to provoke laughter; especially : a brief oral narrative with a climactic humorous twist b (1) : the humorous or ridiculous element in something (2) : an instance of jesting : kidding <can't take a joke> c : practical joke d : laughingstock
2 : something not to be taken seriously : a trifling matter <consider his skiing a joke — Harold Callender> —often used in negative constructions <it is no joke to be lost in the desert>

Now I know why you're in general a pain in the ass on here.

rr7

I'm sorry that I nitpicked the "joke" interpretation that you nitpicked. :devilwink:
 
I have no clue what you're talking about.

Wait, are you now parodying a watcher of Fox News?



;)

julius, a fully owned and operated subsidiary of barfo, and owner/operator of westnob
 
WHOA?! the pot has brownies IN IT?!

What if we took this brownie pot, and like made cookies, man?!

Then it would be like some sort of drug turkduckin:pimp:

Reminds me of a guy at a party who was bragging about his hashish chili. He asked if I had ever tried it. I told him "dude, I can't even keep the brownies lit!"
 
I like this part the best:

The differences MARIS61 sees in them: Andre is a ballhog, Steve...isn't.
Andre is always thinking about himself, Steve...isn't.
Andre is an average passer, but ignores open teammates, especially Roy and Rudy.
Steve is an average passer, but usually finds open teammates for assists.
Despite $7 mil a year, Andre can't buy a 3.
Steve IS money form the arc.

rr7

fixed.
 
Because the pot has brownies in it so we can eat it?

Never thought of that. Years ago we used to put the pot in our brownies, but then the pot was cheaper I guess.:ghoti:

Let's have some basketball. We have a bunch of professional basketball players on this team, let them work out their non-issues.
What's our worry?:dunno:
 
This waiting for the season opener is really annoying. NBA 2K10 helps, but still...

I installed Daisy Reversi a few days ago, and everytime I find myself in the middle of a boring thread, I open Reversi and play a game. My son wants me to learn the game so I can play him. It's shareware for 30 days so I have a deadline to get good. It helps me get through the bad threads.

Another way to endure on this board is to play Spider Solitaire everytime you read something with which you disagree. Lots and lots of Spider. I was 1-suit a week ago, but now I win everytime at the 4-suit level.

My next plan is to become a chess grandmaster while looking at bad posts on the board. Just play one match vs. the hard drive everytime I read someone calling Pritchard an active trader.
 
I hope I don't come across as too ambitious.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top