Exclusive War with Iran starting this week? (6 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Do I need to Google/Claude any Propaganda you spew here for people to know your comments are the most hatful agenda driven lies, distortion and false info?
@Phatguysrule why do you align with this trolling?

This claim appears to be false or heavily distorted. Here's what the evidence actually shows:


What's actually happening (as of early March 2026):


The Israel-US war against Iran began around February 28, 2026. Several things involving UK, France, and Turkey are real, but the framing in your claim is inverted:


  • Iran launched attacks hitting a British base in Cyprus, and struck airports and hotels where British citizens were staying — prompting PM Starmer to change his position and allow the US to use British airbases. Time
  • NATO defenses intercepted a ballistic missile launched by Iran heading toward Turkish airspace — Iran's first apparent attempt to target a NATO member since the war began. The missile was detected crossing Iraqi and Syrian airspace before being neutralized. CBS News

Where the "false flag" narrative comes from:


The false flag accusations are being made by Iran, not credible British media:


  • Iran accused Israel of carrying out a drone attack on Saudi Aramco facilities as a "false flag" operation, claiming Israel's goal was to distract regional countries from its strikes on Iranian civilian sites. Middle East Monitor
  • Iran's military also denied involvement in strikes on Oman, claiming that "the aggressor Zionists and Americans are seeking to attack diplomatic centers and the interests of Muslim countries in the region with the aim of blaming the Islamic Republic." Pravda USA

The source of the claim you saw:


The "false flag" framing appears in fringe outlets like 21st Century Wire, which speculated that Israel might stage a false flag to drag the US into war — sourced from an editor named Patrick Henningsen, not mainstream British media. 21st Century Wire This site is well-known for conspiracy-adjacent and pro-Kremlin narratives.


Bottom line: This is almost certainly Iranian-aligned or fringe-outlet disinformation, misattributed to "British media" to lend it credibility. The actual documented events show Iran attacking British, Turkish, and Gulf assets — not Israel staging false flags against European targets. Classic inversion tactic.


Google or ChatGPT?
 
It's weird how often people will claim they're not one thing, and then immediately do things that prove they're are that one thing.
 
Iran is allowing CNN to report on the war from within its borders.

 
They are forcing mass migration in Lebanon right now and people want to hide behind the cover of antisemitism. Cowards.

 
Nick Funtes is a racist piece of shit. You can find much better voices for that message.
Sure, but that wouldn't highlight the point that even the hard right is turning. Most the people we post about are racists pieces of shit. Doesn't mean they don't happen to be right about this particular issue.
 
Sure, but that wouldn't highlight the point that even the hard right is turning. Most the people we post about are racists pieces of shit. Doesn't means they don't happen to be right about this particular issue.

Who fucking cares? Why normalize that POS?

There are 24 search results in the Epstein files for Iran War. Should we publish those to show even the pedophiles are against this?

1772734258739.png

 
Who fucking cares? Why normalize that POS?

There are 24 search results in the Epstein files for Iran War. Should we publish those to show even the pedophiles are against this?

View attachment 82268

It's not normalizing when they already have a huge platform. That's what the left kept saying about podcasters who had Trump on while they let the election get taken from them because they'd rather stand on "morals." It's good to get perspective from as many sides as possible, not just the ones you agree with.
 
They are forcing mass migration in Lebanon right now and people want to hide behind the cover of antisemitism. Cowards.



Some additional information for those willing - that has nothing to do with hiding behind antisemitism:
The claim that Israel is conducting "mass migration" in Dahiya (beirut) conflates the outcome of displacement with the intent and legal framework behind the strikes — and that distinction matters enormously under international law.
International Humanitarian Law doesn't just permit warning civilians to evacuate combat zones — it requires it. Articles 57-58 of Additional Protocol I obligate belligerent forces to take precautions to protect civilians, including advance warning before strikes. Israel's repeated advance warnings to Dahiya residents — hours and in some cases days before strikes — isn't evidence of a displacement agenda. It's literally legal compliance.

Dahiya is not an arbitrary civilian neighborhood. It has been the acknowledged command-and-control hub of Hezbollah for decades — housing weapons storage, financial infrastructure, and senior military leadership, deliberately embedded within a dense residential area. This is a textbook case of a non-state actor using civilian cover as a strategic shield. Under IHL's principle of distinction, that shifts enormous legal and moral responsibility onto Hezbollah, not Israel.

Is the humanitarian toll devastating? Absolutely. But suffering caused by war is not automatically a war crime. "Population transfer" under the Rome Statute must be deliberate, permanent, and lacking military justification. Directing civilians away from a known military nerve center — with advance warning — satisfies none of those criteria.

The residents of Dahiya were warned to leave. Many did. The target was Hezbollah's infrastructure, not the population. Permanent displacement requires the destruction of the right to return — and that legal threshold has not been established here.

Disagree with Israel's methods if you wish — proportionality debates are legitimate. But labeling a targeted campaign against a designated terrorist organization's headquarters as demographic engineering requires far more than "people fled before the bombs fell."

The strongest argument against Hezbollah right now isn't coming from Israel — it's coming from Lebanon itself.

Lebanese Prime Minister Nawaf Salam just formally banned all of Hezbollah's military activities, declaring them illegal and ordering security forces to prevent any attacks launched from Lebanese soil. Al Jazeera President Aoun backed this up, stating it's "final with no turning back" — war and peace belong to Beirut alone, not to a militia serving Tehran. Al Jazeera

Even longtime Hezbollah ally, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, supported the ban. Al Jazeera When you've lost your own political cover, the "resistance" narrative is finished.
Meanwhile, displaced Lebanese civilians are saying openly: "The people are tired." PBS

Israel didn't create Hezbollah's illegitimacy in Lebanon. Lebanon's own institutions just declared it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top