Re: Was 9/11 George Bush's fault?
I've heard of the stories involving some hijackers showing up in the middleeast etc...Considering they were 'involved' in the most deadly terrorist attack you would think they would make it on the news or other media outlets..etc..Sounds pretty fishy to me. These could be people claiming to be the hijackers as well..etc... The Pentagon video from the gas station was taken as part of the investigation, the FBI took it because it was vital video it needed right away...it's not like they would let the gas station keep it. And I believe the video of the plane hitting the Pentagon was released 2 months ago. I remember watching it, it shows the flash of a white plane and then the fireball...The FBI de-classified it...
Here I found itPentagon Releases Video of 9/11 Attack
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...6051601034.html Dozens of USA Today employee's who work in a building right by the Pentagon confirmed it was a commercial airliner that hit the Pentagon...Why would planes be used in the other 3 attacks and not in the Pentagon attack?<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>At 17:20 EDT on 11 September 2001, 7 World Trade Center collapsed. Since it had been evacuated, there were no casualties.In May 2002, the Federal Emergency Management Agency of the United States (FEMA) released a report on the collapse. [3] FEMA made preliminary findings that the collapse was due primarily to fires on multiple stories caused by debris from the other two towers, and not to the actual impact damage of 1 WTC and 2 WTC as they collapsed. The report noted that, prior to this collapse, there was no record of the fire-induced collapse of a large fire-protected steel building such as 7 WTC.The report did not reach final conclusions, outlining a number of issues needing to be explored with respect to the cause of the collapse. Specifically, FEMA made these findings:?Loss of structural integrity was likely a result of weakening caused by fires on the 5th to 7th floors. The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building to collapse remain unknown at this time. Although the total diesel fuel on the premises contained massive potential energy, the best hypothesis has only a low probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are needed to resolve this issue.? (Chapter 5, pg 31.)In response to FEMA's concerns, the Commerce Department?s National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted a three-year, US$24 million investigation into the structural failure and progressive collapse of several WTC complex structures, including 7 World Trade Center. The study included not only in-house technical expertise, but also drew upon the knowledge of several outside private institutions, including the Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers (SEI/ASCE), the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE), the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH), and the Structural Engineers Association of New York (SEAoNY).[4]NIST has released video and still photo analysis of Building 7 prior to its collapse that appears to indicate a greater degree of structural damage from falling debris than originally assumed by FEMA. Specifically, a large 10-story gash existed on the south facade, extending a third across the face of the building and approximately a quarter of the way into the interior.[5] A unique aspect of the design of 7 WTC was that each outer structural column was responsible for supporting 2,000 square feet (186 square meters) of floor space, suggesting that the simultaneous removal of a number of columns would lead to a severely compromised structure. Consistent with this theory, news footage shows visible cracking and bowing of the building's east wall immediately prior to the collapse, which started from the penthouse floors. [5]The final report from NIST regarding the collapse of 7 WTC was due in July 2005, but is still ongoing.[6] NIST released a progress report in June of 2004 outlining its working hypothesis. On this hypothesis a local failure in a critical column, caused by damage from either fire or falling debris from the collapses of the two towers, progressed first vertically and then horizontally to result in "a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure".[7][8] In answer to the question of whether "a controlled demolition hypothesis is being considered to explain the collapse", NIST says that it "While NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, it would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements."[6]Despite FEMA's preliminary finding that fire caused the collapse, some have presented alternate theories, usually as part of a larger belief in 9/11 conspiracy theories. In support of this belief, they have pointed to the presence of an undercover CIA office in the building[9], and FEMA's finding that the average debris field radius was approximately 70 feet.[10]</div> - Wikipedia (WTC 7)
