We are #1 in the entire NBA

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Blazer Fanatic, except for video #1, I transcribed any relevant quotation.

1. There is too much to transcribe, but listen to 1:00 to 1:45. From there to 3:00 is about last year's team but not critical or specifically about Hickson. This is a good video in your favor.

2. Stotts says about Lopez at 0:50, "He fills a void for us. J.J. Hickson did a terrific job last year as our center, but what we want to do and what we need to accomplish this year, we need Robin Lopez to be a starting center and to be a presence and with that all being said, it's, the way we're going to improve our defense isn't just Robin Lopez."

3. At 0:40, Lillard says he likes it that Lopez yelled, "Where's the help!" in a practice. Players then helped.

4. At 1:40, Aldridge says about Lopez in the first preseason game, "He was on the break with Deandre Jordan and he went up and took that foul. I don't feel like we had that last year. I feel like he has that actual character to be that guy down low."

5. There is no reference to Hickson, defense, rebounding, last year's deficiencies, or improvement over last year. Did you just pick this video at random?

6. At 2:50, Matthews says, "Our problem wasn't scoring the ball. And then adding Robin, Earl Watson, guys who are really defensive-minded, I think it's just going to help our team."

Summary: Aldridge (videos 1 and 4) are the only relevant ones. Did you include the others (which praise Lopez, as players always praise their teammates, but say nothing about Hickson) as filler just to make me work?

In video 1, Aldridge says Hickson had "other things going on," which must mean that he had a contract to negotiate in the summer. That doesn't mean he would have continued worrying about stats once on a new contract. Aldridge does not say that Hickson was selfish or "played only for J.J." In summary, I learned that Aldridge talked like this, but that no one else did in the videos.
 
Boob, I read your first sentence. Pissed off that you had called me crazy, I got halfway into the second sentence. I read no more.

Someday you will learn to write without insulting. Actually, no you won't. Years ago I used to actually try to write about your selective use of stats, showing you each time how you displayed only the convenient ones. It didn't change your arrogance. *Deleted*
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really don't know why you guys take Jlprk seriously. Maris used to get under the skin of people on this board with his love of all things Sergio, and Jlprk pushes his Hickson agenda. It's pretty clear to me.
 
Boob, I read your first sentence. Pissed off that you had called me crazy, I got halfway into the second sentence. I read no more.

Someday you will learn to write without insulting. Actually, no you won't. Years ago I used to actually try to write about your selective use of stats, showing you each time how you displayed only the convenient ones. It didn't change your arrogance.

Or, maybe you're the one who has never learned how to express an opinion without insulting someone.

You might also try addressing the post and not the poster. Nah, this is your typical out when you've clearly lost a debate, all the facts contradict your misinformed opinions and you don't have a leg to stand on.

BNM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Someday you will learn to write without insulting. Actually, no you won't. Years ago I used to actually try to write about your selective use of stats, showing you each time how you displayed only the convenient ones. It didn't change your arrogance.

Or, maybe you're the one who has never learned how to express an opinion without insulting someone.

You might also try addressing the post and not the poster. Nah, this is your typical out when you've clearly lost a debate, all the facts contradict your misinformed opinions and you don't have a leg to stand on.

BNM

Please restore my post to its unedited state. If you're going to edit out the passage I responded to, it makes my post completely irrelevant.

BNM
 
Please restore my post to its unedited state. If you're going to edit out the passage I responded to, it makes my post completely irrelevant.

BNM

If I edit out a personal attack, I can't leave said personal attack in your post. That's just how it works. I can delete your post if that's what you want.
 
Please restore my post to its unedited state. If you're going to edit out the passage I responded to, it makes my post completely irrelevant.

BNM

Why don't you just re-edit the personal attack back into your quote. Once it's been removed once, the mods generally don't notice if it gets replaced. :devilwink:
 
If I edit out a personal attack, I can't leave said personal attack in your post. That's just how it works. I can delete your post if that's what you want.

So, he calls me an asshole and you completely neuter my response by deleting the passage I quoted. That's pretty fucking stupid. People should be held accountable for their actions. Instead, he gets to throw his little temper tantrum and we all look the other way and pretend like it didn't happen. He's not a 7-year old child. Stop treating him like one. He's a grown man and should be held accountable for his actions.

BNM
 
Someday you will learn to write without insulting. Actually, no you won't. Years ago I used to actually try to write about your selective use of stats, showing you each time how you displayed only the convenient ones. It didn't change your arrogance.

Or, maybe you're the one who has never learned how to express an opinion without insulting someone.

You might also try addressing the post and not the poster. Nah, this is your typical out when you've clearly lost a debate, all the facts contradict your misinformed opinions and you don't have a leg to stand on.

BNM

BTW, in your zeal to cover his tracks, you also fucked up the attribution. I didn't write that first paragraph. If you're going to edit my posts because someone else called me an asshole, at least do it right.

BNM
 
Blazer Fanatic, except for video #1, I transcribed any relevant quotation.

1. There is too much to transcribe, but listen to 1:00 to 1:45. From there to 3:00 is about last year's team but not critical or specifically about Hickson. This is a good video in your favor.

Summary: Aldridge (videos 1 and 4) are the only relevant ones. Did you include the others (which praise Lopez, as players always praise their teammates, but say nothing about Hickson) as filler just to make me work?

In video 1, Aldridge says Hickson had "other things going on," which must mean that he had a contract to negotiate in the summer. That doesn't mean he would have continued worrying about stats once on a new contract. Aldridge does not say that Hickson was selfish or "played only for J.J." In summary, I learned that Aldridge talked like this, but that no one else did in the videos.

Awe, I'm sorry. It's good for you! No, the only quote I could find sifting through 100s of videos on youtube was the LA one on top. I thought I did mention "There are 100s of video's on youtube on the portlandtrailblazers channel. I can't find the comments by Wes talking about having confidence to play better D knowing Lopez has his back and that he couldn't be aggressive on wing D because of JJ, and about JJ just looking out for JJ. Still looking for Dame's comments about JJ only being about JJ. But both were not meant to disparage Hickson. They were just being candid."

The other videos were pertaining to player comments. Some say you can't take anything from them. I was of the opposite opinion, this year, with this team. They were very candid, discussing strengths, weaknesses, and the path forward. And from those dozens of videos I watched during training camp and pre-season, coupled with the additions and another year with the core 4 and Stotts, I have no earthy idea where these guys are coming from that said Portland would only improve by 5-8 wins max, and likely miss the play-offs.

[video]http://www.oregonlive.com/blazers/i..._blazers_media_day_2013_lamarcus_aldridge_get .html[/video], about the 3 min mark I found on Oregon Live. LA makes a Freudian slip and the media guys start laughing out loud, and LA attempt to cover his base. He liked Hickson, but he wasn't a good fit because he couldn't defend and was selfish with rebounding, not boxing out, and trying to get "his" instead of passing to Batum, Wes, LA, Dame. And he was bad at passing, but that's a different issue entirely.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top