WESLEY MATTHEWS STEALS IT AND ITS GAME OVER

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I thought the flagrant called against Parsons was iffy at best. It looked like incidental contact while Parsons was going for the ball.

I credit Harden for being a bonehead on the last play. The ball ultimately should have been in his hands at the end, but... He ran to Beverly who was bringing the ball up over half court. There was plenty of time to get the ball to Harden. But in going to Beverly to get the ball, he allowed two blazers defenders to double team both Beverly and Harden. He also screened for Matthews, the guy guarding him, so Beverly didn't see him until too late.

Great win for the Blazers.
 
What did my post have to do with the Blazers winning? OP said Houston fans bitched about refs after loss. I pointed out our fans do the same after a loss

Sweet! Glad you are excited like many other Blazer Fans about how we battled through and won!

GO BLAZERS!
 
I thought the flagrant called against Parsons was iffy at best. It looked like incidental contact while Parsons was going for the ball.

I credit Harden for being a bonehead on the last play. The ball ultimately should have been in his hands at the end, but... He ran to Beverly who was bringing the ball up over half court. There was plenty of time to get the ball to Harden. But in going to Beverly to get the ball, he allowed two blazers defenders to double team both Beverly and Harden. He also screened for Matthews, the guy guarding him, so Beverly didn't see him until too late.

Great win for the Blazers.

It was iffy, but it looked more brutal than the "flagrant" they called earlier in the series on Mo.
 
I thought the flagrant called against Parsons was iffy at best. It looked like incidental contact while Parsons was going for the ball.

I credit Harden for being a bonehead on the last play. The ball ultimately should have been in his hands at the end, but... He ran to Beverly who was bringing the ball up over half court. There was plenty of time to get the ball to Harden. But in going to Beverly to get the ball, he allowed two blazers defenders to double team both Beverly and Harden. He also screened for Matthews, the guy guarding him, so Beverly didn't see him until too late.

Great win for the Blazers.

Yeah that flagrant was a little questionable in my opinion as well. That was a playoff foul. Remember them?!?! The NBA is getting so soft lately....
 
I thought the flagrant called against Parsons was iffy at best. It looked like incidental contact while Parsons was going for the ball.

Yep, that was crap. I was surprised and disappointed that they called it that way. Then again, with the caliber of officiating we've seen in this series, I shouldn't have been surprised at all.
 
I thought the flagrant called against Parsons was iffy at best. It looked like incidental contact while Parsons was going for the ball.

I credit Harden for being a bonehead on the last play. The ball ultimately should have been in his hands at the end, but... He ran to Beverly who was bringing the ball up over half court. There was plenty of time to get the ball to Harden. But in going to Beverly to get the ball, he allowed two blazers defenders to double team both Beverly and Harden. He also screened for Matthews, the guy guarding him, so Beverly didn't see him until too late.

Great win for the Blazers.

I think they called it a Flagrant 1 and not a 2 because it was incidental.
 
Wesley Matthews is the MVP of this series. Yes, we love LA, and Damien, but Wes' defense on Harden and his guttiness are the key IMO.
 
Nah, I bitched during a victory.
Me too.

It's not like I don't complain when I see bad or biased officiating when I watch other teams' games. If it's wrong it's wrong. The officiating is cheapening the game.
 
Wesley Matthews is the MVP of this series. Yes, we love LA, and Damien, but Wes' defense on Harden and his guttiness are the key IMO.

Absolutely one of the top candidates, but I will put the MVP on Aldridge this series... Aldridge set the tone for this team. Without him being there, we would be swept, regardless of how well Matthews played defense.
 
I think they called it a Flagrant 1 and not a 2 because it was incidental.

All fouls are incidental. The rule talks about unnecessary contact. I don't think he was playing the man, he was playing the ball. He was up in the air trying for a block and mostly got LMA's arms, which is typical of lots of fouls.

http://www.nba.com/news/rulesregulations_2010_04_17.html

RULES AND REGULATIONS

The following is a summary of rules and regulations regarding flagrant fouls, technical fouls, elbow fouls and other player conduct issues.

A. Flagrant Foul Rules

There are two types of Flagrant Fouls, as follows:

Flagrant “1” (FFP1) - unnecessary contact committed by a player against an opponent. The opposing team is awarded two (2) free throws and possession.

Flagrant “2” (FFP2) - unnecessary and excessive contact committed by a player against an opponent. The opposing team is awarded two (2) free throws and possession and the player committing the foul is automatically ejected.
 
It wasn't a flagrant imo

Blazers got a break from the refs with that call
 
If the Parsons foul wasn't flagrant, then neither was Mos in G1.

Btw, I don't remember what game it was but there was a game two days ago where a flagrant was called and they asked Steve Javie if it was the right call. Javie said sometimes they'll call flagrants depending on the feel of the game and it doesn't necessarily have to 100‰ match the rulebook. Not saying I agree with it, but there you go.
 
I think it was more a case of them calling flagrant one first, then looking at it, and the replay didn't convincingly change the call.
 
Me too.

It's not like I don't complain when I see bad or biased officiating when I watch other teams' games. If it's wrong it's wrong. The officiating is cheapening the game.

Yeah, the officiating has become the story of the playoffs.
 
Yeah, the officiating has become the story of the playoffs.

The ironic thing was the only game the officiating wasn't an issue, the Blazers won handedly... The NBA can thank the refs for the 3 overtime games in this series...
 
The ironic thing was the only game the officiating wasn't an issue, the Blazers won handedly... The NBA can thank the refs for the 3 overtime games in this series...

I'm not just talking this series. For the ENTIRE playoffs. The officiating has been the story.
 
Wes in Game 2:
8co5l.jpg


Wes in Game 4:
8fp0k.jpg
 
All fouls are incidental. The rule talks about unnecessary contact. I don't think he was playing the man, he was playing the ball. He was up in the air trying for a block and mostly got LMA's arms, which is typical of lots of fouls.

http://www.nba.com/news/rulesregulations_2010_04_17.html

RULES AND REGULATIONS

The following is a summary of rules and regulations regarding flagrant fouls, technical fouls, elbow fouls and other player conduct issues.

A. Flagrant Foul Rules

There are two types of Flagrant Fouls, as follows:

Flagrant “1” (FFP1) - unnecessary contact committed by a player against an opponent. The opposing team is awarded two (2) free throws and possession.

Flagrant “2” (FFP2) - unnecessary and excessive contact committed by a player against an opponent. The opposing team is awarded two (2) free throws and possession and the player committing the foul is automatically ejected.

It was because Parson's left hand was pulling on LMA above the shoulder. Without that, I don't think it would have been a flagrant.
 
I thought the flagrant called against Parsons was iffy at best. It looked like incidental contact while Parsons was going for the ball.

I credit Harden for being a bonehead on the last play. The ball ultimately should have been in his hands at the end, but... He ran to Beverly who was bringing the ball up over half court. There was plenty of time to get the ball to Harden. But in going to Beverly to get the ball, he allowed two blazers defenders to double team both Beverly and Harden. He also screened for Matthews, the guy guarding him, so Beverly didn't see him until too late.

Great win for the Blazers.

I've watched this play over and over and he was not going for the ball at all. That being said it still wasn't a flagrant.
 
I've watched this play over and over and he was not going for the ball at all. That being said it still wasn't a flagrant.

By definition, if you're not going for the ball and you're not wrapping them up, isn't it a flagrant?
 
It was because Parson's left hand was pulling on LMA above the shoulder. Without that, I don't think it would have been a flagrant.

There was one angle on the replay, that clearly showed Parson's made contact with Aldridge, above the shoulders with BOTH arms. They only showed it once, and it wasn't excessive, in either case, but I think that may be what the refs were looking at that upheld the Flagrant 1 call on the floor. In the good, old days, it would have just been a good, hard foul, but the precedent set in this series, and throughout the league in recent years, is contact above the shoulders is a Flagrant 1. Weak? Yes. Consistent? Also yes.

BNM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top