What about Boogie?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Boogie is #1 on my want list. I would trade anybody but Dame and Meyers to get him - I think a Meyers/Boogie combo would be deadly. Maybe not next year, but by the following season for sure.
DMC would be our #1 scoring option regardless of whether LMA is on the team. LMA can slide back to #3 where he should be. DMC>Dame>LMA
 
blue9 said:
Boogie is #1 on my want list. I would trade anybody but Dame and Meyers to get him - I think a Meyers/Boogie combo would be deadly. Maybe not next year, but by the following season for sure.
DMC would be our #1 scoring option regardless of whether LMA is on the team. LMA can slide back to #3 where he should be. DMC>Dame>LMA
Click to expand...

As a fellow 'blue' poster. I will also say I'm down with the boogie-man.

(I should prob rename myself... lol)
 
blue9 said:
Boogie is #1 on my want list. I would trade anybody but Dame and Meyers to get him - I think a Meyers/Boogie combo would be deadly. Maybe not next year, but by the following season for sure.
DMC would be our #1 scoring option regardless of whether LMA is on the team. LMA can slide back to #3 where he should be. DMC>Dame>LMA
Click to expand...
Having Boogie would be unstoppable as long as Boogie actually understands that he's on a team. The only concern is "will he accept sharing the ball?" If that's true, then it would be a no brainer.

Obviously, we couldn't trade Aldridge for him because Aldridge wouldn't support this deal. That would mean it would take Batum and Leonard IMO. Leonard would be a tough player to lose, but they would need a big in return if they are even interested.
 
blue9 said:
LOL - yeah, you certainly don't want people to attribute my unpopular views and opinions to you!
Click to expand...
The only thing that is unpopular is your opinion of Aldridge. And the only reason why is how you are normally pretty rational, good NBA IQ and observant with everything else other than Batum and Aldridge.
 
I'd replace LA with Cuz in a heartbeat. Too bad there's no way it can happen
 
magnifier661 said:
Having Boogie would be unstoppable as long as Boogie actually understands that he's on a team. The only concern is "will he accept sharing the ball?" If that's true, then it would be a no brainer.

Obviously, we couldn't trade Aldridge for him because Aldridge wouldn't support this deal. That would mean it would take Batum and Leonard IMO. Leonard would be a tough player to lose, but they would need a big in return if they are even interested.
Click to expand...
I know LMA wouldn't agree to a S&T to SAC - that's a no-brainer! However, a S&T to SAS for Danny Green? That makes shipping Nic to SAC a little easier. The trouble lies in the fact that SAC just signed Gay to a long-term deal, so I don't know that they'd really want Nic. It's too bad we gave up a 1st for AAA, packaging future 1sts with some sort of package revolving around CJ/Rolo/AAA (depending upon options, etc) would be ideal for us (maybe not for SAC though!). Finding trades that make sense for SAC is pretty difficult - unless they're really high on CJ and/or Leonard. And I already stated I don't like the idea of trading Leonard - I want them to play together!
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=nyhjncf
 
blue9 said:
LOL - yeah, you certainly don't want people to attribute my unpopular views and opinions to you!
Click to expand...

Nah its not like that at all. We agree on many things and also disagree. :)
its just so similar though confusing to some.
 
blue9 said:
I know LMA wouldn't agree to a S&T to SAC - that's a no-brainer! However, a S&T to SAS for Danny Green? That makes shipping Nic to SAC a little easier. The trouble lies in the fact that SAC just signed Gay to a long-term deal, so I don't know that they'd really want Nic. It's too bad we gave up a 1st for AAA, packaging future 1sts with some sort of package revolving around CJ/Rolo/AAA (depending upon options, etc) would be ideal for us (maybe not for SAC though!). Finding trades that make sense for SAC is pretty difficult - unless they're really high on CJ and/or Leonard. And I already stated I don't like the idea of trading Leonard - I want them to play together!
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=nyhjncf
Click to expand...

Afflalo and Lopez would need to okay that deal, which is hardly an incentive honestly. And Danny Green would be only a 9-12 mil player. You would need way more than Green to make a sign and trade to SAS happen.
 
magnifier661 said:
The only thing that is unpopular is your opinion of Aldridge. And the only reason why is how you are normally pretty rational, good NBA IQ and observant with everything else other than Batum and Aldridge.
Click to expand...
I'm only perceived as irrational with regards to LMA - but I can't help the fact that others' perceptions are often wrong. (Though I do admit that sometimes I allow hyperbole to come into the mix...I would hope that others understand that when hyperbole is used it is for illustrative reasons, and not meant to be taken literally.)
And regarding Nic - I would contend that it is others who are irrational. I've always viewed him as a role player, recognized his limitations, and set my expectations accordingly.
 
When we had LaMarcus and Marcus [Camby], I dreamed of adding DeMarcus if only to torment Mike Rice. Better late than never.
 
cmeese47 said:
We are talking about arguably the best Center in the NBA and at worst the 3rd best. For 2 young players who had a few good playoff games. A core of Lillard, Aldridge and Boogie is fierce. IMO if you have a chance to get a dynamic player like Boogie who is just 24 you do it, especially if it can be done without giving up one of your current All-Stars.
Click to expand...

Most fans on this board love the idea of trading for another teams star player but for ridiculous offers where we give up little talent.

The trade has to make sense for both teams. Cousins was voted an allstar by NBA coaches ahead of Lillard. If we get the best asset on the Kings they will want multiple enticing pieces. Batum, CJ and Meyers still probably isn't enough to get it done from their end but to say the Blazers should try to make the trade while giving up less is delusional.
 
BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 said:
I thought Malone and him were good. Then they fired him lol
Click to expand...

Yeah DeMarcus got along great with Malone and the team had a winning record until he got injured. Then he gets fired? The management of that franchise is a joke and if they don't win in the next few years I bet he will look to leave.

It would be awesome to have a LaDeMarcus frontcourt.
 
i would do it if it involves eric moreland. if not then i would still do it. if we trade batum and draft picks for cousins, then i would do it. if we can still keep this year draft pick, we should that on sam dekker. then in FA we should sign draymond green. our team would instantly become dangerous
pg- damian, cj, frazier
sg- wesley, affalo
sf- green, dekker
pf- LA, meyers, freeland
c- boogie, robin

you just gotta take that trade if you have a plan on the SF spot.
 
cmeese47 said:
Rumors are going around
Click to expand...

Does that mean "I'm trying to start some rumors"?

cmeese47 said:
Can we get Cousins?
Click to expand...

Almost certainly not. Unless we're offering Aldridge. Who would have to agree to be signed and traded... to Sacramento. So, basically, no.

cmeese47 said:
If we could would you want him?
Click to expand...

If Zach can grow up and become a productive player on both ends, maybe Cousins can. Who knows? I'm not as virulently opposed as I once was. And Cousins has a bafflingly high drpm rating.
 
Draco said:
Most fans on this board love the idea of trading for another teams star player but for ridiculous offers where we give up little talent.

The trade has to make sense for both teams. Cousins was voted an allstar by NBA coaches ahead of Lillard. If we get the best asset on the Kings they will want multiple enticing pieces. Batum, CJ and Meyers still probably isn't enough to get it done from their end but to say the Blazers should try to make the trade while giving up less is delusional.
Click to expand...

Basically you need to get a third team involved. San Antonio makes sense, we can send them Batum in exchange for Green and them sending over a 1st round pick to the Kings. We give up Batum, CJ, Meyers and probably a future protected 1st round pick and get Danny Green and Boogie Cousins, I can live with that.
 
damianlillard said:
i would do it if it involves eric moreland. if not then i would still do it. if we trade batum and draft picks for cousins, then i would do it. if we can still keep this year draft pick, we should that on sam dekker. then in FA we should sign draymond green. our team would instantly become dangerous
pg- damian, cj, frazier
sg- wesley, affalo
sf- green, dekker
pf- LA, meyers, freeland
c- boogie, robin

you just gotta take that trade if you have a plan on the SF spot.
Click to expand...
That's a 65 win team.
 
damianlillard said:
i would do it if it involves eric moreland. if not then i would still do it. if we trade batum and draft picks for cousins, then i would do it. if we can still keep this year draft pick, we should that on sam dekker. then in FA we should sign draymond green. our team would instantly become dangerous
pg- damian, cj, frazier
sg- wesley, affalo
sf- green, dekker
pf- LA, meyers, freeland
c- boogie, robin

you just gotta take that trade if you have a plan on the SF spot.
Click to expand...

Batum and draft picks aren't getting cousions. That's just nuts.

I looked at that and was like "damn that's a really good team".... that's when I knew it wouldn't work.
 
Strenuus said:
Batum and draft picks aren't getting cousions. That's just nuts.

I looked at that and was like "damn that's a really good team".... that's when I knew it wouldn't work.
Click to expand...

Getting Boogie for that package is more likely than Green leaving Golden State it is a nice thought though
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

RonBrewer
Boogie Cousins vs. Enes Kanter
Replies
15
Views
496
EL PRESIDENTE
EL PRESIDENTE
blue9
Trade Thread - All Trade Machine Posts Here
2
Replies
55
Views
2K
Natebishop3
Natebishop3
KeepOnRollin
Forum Game Over/Under #10 Kings
Replies
20
Views
3K
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog
Rastapopoulos
Does anyone seriously think we had a better roster than New Orleans?
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
Phatguysrule
Phatguysrule
magnifier661
What I liked about claver
Replies
27
Views
1K
magnifier661
magnifier661

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top