Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Did Derek Fisher lead his team to a title?
Maybe Miller just has to be an acceptable player in the rotation, the 8th best player on our team. Nobody in the front office is expecting him to lead the franchise anywhere.
Hear hear! Give the ball to Roy! He is an All Star. Miller's career is nearly over. Find a guy who can play with Roy. Fisher doesn't dominate the ball. Fisher complements Kobe. We need a similar guy for Roy.
Had one. His name was Steve Blake. He was the PG on a 54-win team that was the second youngest in the NBA. Now, we have an aging ballhog who hasn't won a thing in his career, and the All-NBA guard is still confused on how to play with the ballhog who hasn't won a thing in his career.
May as well let Armon Johnson try the point. At least he tries to defend and knows his role on offense.
Further proof, you really are PapaG.
I'm not saying that what Miller is doing, or rather not doing, is a bad thing. The results in his career thus far, however, certainly don't validate that his offseason approach leads to postseason success.

Further proof, you really are PapaG.
that a 34 year-old PG who has never defended well, never shot well, and never won in the playoffs will suddenly get better in his old age and lead this team to a title?
![]()
that a 34 year-old PG who has never defended well, never shot well, and never won in the playoffs will suddenly get better in his old age and lead this team to a title?
![]()
what makes the blazers front office think that we can get away with no backup center when they had all summer to find a backup knowing greg and joels state?
our front office is just as bad as when kpee was here. miller isnt the answer, roy has become a prima donna and our center situation grows worst daily. has Cho watched the pre season?
Well you know each year only one team wins the finals. Everybody else fell short. Every team that fell short, and the team that won it all, will try to get better in years between to reach that goal. But until the teams find better players to fill the positions of need, they keep what they have and move forward the best they can.
Seemingly? Any way of actually knowing our interest level, really?
I guess I'm still a bit burned about not getting Darren Collison, or seemingly not even being at all interested in him.
I guess I'm still a bit burned about not getting Darren Collison, or seemingly not even being at all interested in him.
I agree with this. I hear what Hasoos is saying, but I'm sure Collison came up at some point during discussions, and I wish the Blazers would have understood that Paul was off the table and changed gears to get Collison.
I guess it all depends on what you believe out of the articles we read about the trades that almost went down. Because if all is to be believed, the team that shot down the trade that would have netted us Chris Paul, was Denver, not New Orleans. So that being said, if that was true, it makes no sense that the Blazers have ever been told he is unobtainable, and it makes sense that they have made repeated attempts to get him here. They know now they can get him here. They just need to find the right deal to make it happen before somebody else does.
Yeah, I was really hoping we'd target Collison too. I'd have even given up Batum for him (especially now that Matthews seems legit), and I really like Batum. Oh well.
You have to remember that for all the guy's flaws, Miller was our best player in a number of games last year, especially when Roy went down. He's not ideal, but among NBA starting point guards he's at least average.
It's been a decade since Portland even had an average-quality starting PG. So although I don't think I overvalue him, I appreciate what we've got.
Problem is, Miller doesn't really play like a PG anymore. He just dominates the ball and tries to score on his own. Witness his 52 point game. How many games did he have 15+ assists? Exactly.
