What Makes the Blazer Front Office Think...

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Problem is, Miller doesn't really play like a PG anymore. He just dominates the ball and tries to score on his own. Witness his 52 point game. How many games did he have 15+ assists? Exactly.
His overall numbers last year were close to his career averages. Projected out to 36 min, his FGA rate was up to 13.1 compared to a career av. of 12.1, which isn't indicative of some major switch in his style of play. Last year Steve Nash's FGA rate was up to 13.5 shots per 36 over his career av. of 12.5... is he still playing like a PG?

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/m/millean02.html

Miller is the best option running the Blazer point since PIP, though thats not really saying much. Without being an outside threat he's obviously not the perfect fit beside Brandon, but the team was very effective with that pair in the 2nd half of the season. He's obviously not the longterm solution but he's smart, capable and extremely durable. Reports are he's in tremendous shape going into the season... if he's the weakest starting link I like the team's chances.

STOMP
 
Problem is, Miller doesn't really play like a PG anymore. He just dominates the ball and tries to score on his own. Witness his 52 point game. How many games did he have 15+ assists? Exactly.

How many games did he have with 10+ assists? 12

How many games did he have with 15+ shots (not including FTs)? 18

Yikes...
 
Problem is, Miller doesn't really play like a PG anymore. He just dominates the ball and tries to score on his own. Witness his 52 point game. How many games did he have 15+ assists? Exactly.

If I'm not mistaken Brandon was injured and not playing in the Dallas game.
 
Further proof, you really are PapaG.

Brilliant. No argument just nonsense.

Probably because you know he's correct in his assessment of this sinking ship.

Just call him a troll close your eyes, plug your ears and go "NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA" and we'll win a championship.
 
Brandon missed a few of the games where Miller put up 15+ shots. Besides, as a PG SHOULD do, I think a lot of Miller's shots was recognizing what the team needed at the moment, and giving his best effort to do just that. We would struggle on offense at times, and if that is happening, I want a PG out there who will try to do what the team needs. Whether it's a bucket for himself or others. A stand outside type guy like Blake can't do that.
 
Brilliant. No argument just nonsense.

Probably because you know he's correct in his assessment of this sinking ship.

Just call him a troll close your eyes, plug your ears and go "NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA" and we'll win a championship.

Are you PapaG's big brother?
 
"address the post, not the poster, please".
 
Are you PapaG's big brother?

Anytime someone criticizes the club, no matter how detailed or how stupid they're been labeled a troll.

That was the only point I was making. It's a dicks way out. The poster can't address the issue so he takes the low road of "name calling."

You should take note of what your fella Brian from WA wrote.

Calling BGrantFan "Papa G" is not a take. It's just lazy and says more about you than him. It's just stupid and useless. Calling me Papa G's big brother is even more absurd

Why even bother? I thought you were a mod.
 
If I'm not mistaken Brandon was injured and not playing in the Dallas game.

You are correct. Miller carried us through Dallas. Bayless carried us through San Antonio. You remember, the day Bayless was declared new leader of the free world for a day in Portland? :ohno:
 
Problem is, Miller doesn't really play like a PG anymore. He just dominates the ball and tries to score on his own. Witness his 52 point game. How many games did he have 15+ assists? Exactly.

Yeah, what a stoopid player, single-handedly winning that game on the road for the short-handed Blazers. He only shot 0.710 FG%, 1.000 3FG% and 0.875 FT%. He shouldn't have been such a ballhog scoring all those points on high percentage uncontested shots and should have focused more on getting the ball to Juwan Howard (1-3), Martell Webster (1-3), Nicolas Batum (0-2), Rudy Fernandez (0-3) and Jeff Pendergraph (1-3). But no, he just wanted to pad his own stats and WIN THE FUCKING GAME! He was clearly abusing both Kidd and Barea and could get to the rim with ease on a Dallas team with no shot blocking presence in the paint. Other than his one 3-point attempt it was bascially a lay-up drill for Miller all night long. He recognized this and took advantage of it to help his team win the game. Sounds like a smart thing for a PG to do to me.

Learn the game, then post. Oh, and, check fucking mate!

BNM
 
God, JB killed San Antonio that game!
 
Anytime someone criticizes the club, no matter how detailed or how stupid they're been labeled a troll.

That was the only point I was making. It's a dicks way out. The poster can't address the issue so he takes the low road of "name calling."

You should take note of what your fella Brian from WA wrote.

Calling BGrantFan "Papa G" is not a take. It's just lazy and says more about you than him. It's just stupid and useless. Calling me Papa G's big brother is even more absurd

Why even bother? I thought you were a mod.

And you are taking things waaaaaay too seriously.

Are you saying that calling someone PapaG is "name calling?" That's a pretty big stretch, and not one I'm about to enforce as a mod. Zags made the comment about PapaG because Miller was always a favorite target of that particular poster. He didn't personally attack Bgrantfan or PapaG (if they are two different people), so I don't see what your gripe is. He simply made an observation. He didn't even call PapaG a troll. You're playing a forum hero and I think THAT'S a little "absurd" considering your history here.
 
Lol - is it just me or is this even more proof? Seems like PapaG use to say the same thing pretty frequently.

I don't know what who you are or what you're talking about, but barfo used that rationale (with direct quote) to censor a harmless post of mine two days ago. He must have felt silly about it, because he still hasn't given me the simple courtesy of returning my PM to him on why my post got deleted.
 
I would guess it got deleted for addressing a poster, and not that individual's post, but I'm just taking a shot in the dark.
 
I would guess it got deleted for addressing a poster, and not that individual's post, but I'm just taking a shot in the dark.

Both were addressed, as is the case in at least 50% of the posts here these days. But, barfo was having a bad go of it in an OT thread that I wasn't even posting in, and I imagine he needed a quick ego boost. So, a quick deletion late at night, and all is right in his world.
 
Both were addressed, as is the case in at least 50% of the posts here these days. But, barfo was having a bad go of it in an OT thread that I wasn't even posting in, and I imagine he needed a quick ego boost. So, a quick deletion late at night, and all is right in his world.

Boooo fucking hoooo.
 
And you are taking things waaaaaay too seriously.

Are you saying that calling someone PapaG is "name calling?"

No, I'm saying it's fucking boring.

It's not a take. It means nothing. What's the fucking obsession anyway?

"Yeah, he's totally PapaG, we totally got him. I totally knew it."



Forum hero? My history? :rolleyes:

You may want to reread the threads I'm involved in. It usually starts with me making a point and then all the gaylords (Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil) going apeshit with personal attacks to which I then respond almost always backing up my point only to be meant with further attacks.

Go read them.
 

Those posts are better than at least 50% of the stuff posted here these days, plus they were at least creative in origin and style. Also, I'm not sure how posts from a year and a half ago prove any point about the present.
 
Last edited:
Those posts are better than at least 50% of the stuff posted here these days, plus they were at least creative in origin and style. Also, I'm not sure how posts from a year and a half ago prove any point about the present.

You two really seem to have each other's backs here. It is cute.
 
Brilliant. No argument just nonsense.

Probably because you know he's correct in his assessment of this sinking ship.

Just call him a troll close your eyes, plug your ears and go "NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA" and we'll win a championship.

PapaG loved Blake.

When have I said were going to win the championship? I ridicule the starting PF on a daily basis. I'm sorry that you're delusional.
 
Did you see Blake get 18 and 6 last night? Not bad for a traitor!
 
when K*be starts trying, Blake won't get enough shots for 18 points. :)
 
BGrantfan,

After some research by some boardies people discovered that PapaG's real name was Grant Dixon. Both obnoxious, both love Blake and hate on Miller.

I just kind of put two and two together.
 
BGrantfan,

After some research by some boardies people discovered that PapaG's real name was Grant Dixon. Both obnoxious, both love Blake and hate on Miller.

I just kind of put two and two together.

Well, my name isn't Grant Dixon. I can't vouche for PapaG, but you and the rest of the Junior Detective League may want to reopen your case in terms of my actual name. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top