What should we do with MyLe?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

What should we do with MyLe?


  • Total voters
    53
  • Poll closed .

Blazers Roy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2015
Messages
2,621
Likes
2,909
Points
113
I'm sorry, but i can't stand the guy anymore.
He actually made me angry while the team led by 50, who would do such a thing? :curse:

I'll tell you who! this fucking guy can!
myLe.jpg

So what's your preference? how should Neil deal with this problem?

Also, can this :craphead: be the new Meyers emoji ?
 
He looked improved during preseason, I say we give him a few more games.
 
If he has improved then he will be good to be at the end of the bench just in case and if he hasnt improved then he needs to be at the end of the bench. Long story short with our front line depth he isnt going to play
 
He's locked in as the 4th string C. He's insurance in case of injury to Nurk/Ed/Zach.

It's not like he's taking up PT from others who deserve more. And he's not a malcontent. No point in waiving him and keeping $10 mil on the books.
 
Every team needs a backup backup center. If he never plays, then we had great frontcourt health all year. If we have a spate of injuries, he'll see time, and will provide value.

I'm not going to shed a tear if he is included in a mid-season trade, but I'm certainly not hoping for him to be cut. If the only consternation he causes is not playing well during garbage time, then we don't really have much to complain about.
 
I know preseason doesn't mean that much, but the guy did average something like 18 pts/36, 11 reb/36 shooting like 70% from three. I would give him a few games to see what he does.

I am ready to move him though, primarily based on his defense. We have plenty of guys at the 4-5 who defend better than he likely ever will and I would rather they got the minutes.
 
He's locked in as the 4th string C. He's insurance in case of injury to Nurk/Ed/Zach.

It's not like he's taking up PT from others who deserve more. And he's not a malcontent. No point in waiving him and keeping $10 mil on the books.

He WILL take PT from Collins, i guarantee it. Stotts likes Myers and he likes experience.

I'm pretty sure MyLe's softness and insecurity is bad for our momentum and morale.

It's true that PA will keep paying him in case he gets waived, but think about all the potential players we could tryout with his spot. :yummy:
 
Regardless of liking him, or hating him, or not caring enough to have 50 threads about him.......from a luxury tax standpoint his 10 million is the one I would try to move...over all the other 13 contracts. This is purely based on the amount of the contract and his future position on the depth chart. If it were not for the repeat offender rule, I would not care one way or the other. He is fine for a 3rd center on the team. Just not in our team salary scenario.

Something like O'Quinn's 4 mil ending contract is of course ideal. Or to a team who is hit with a season ending injury and needs a center who can shoot to help out. Not holding my breathe.
 
I am ready to move him though, primarily based on his defense. We have plenty of guys at the 4-5 who defend better than he likely ever will and I would rather they got the minutes.

I think the fact that he played so little in a blow-out game shows that the organization is also ready to move on from him, but at the end of the day, until someone is willing to take him - he is here - so I would just let him play a little every once in a while in the hope that he either proves us all wrong or builds his trade value.
 
He WILL take PT from Collins, i guarantee it. Stotts likes Myers and he likes experience.

I'm pretty sure MyLe's softness and insecurity is bad for our momentum and morale.

It's true that PA will keep paying him in case he gets waived, but think about all the potential players we could tryout with his spot. :yummy:

Stotts doesn’t like Meyers.
 
He will have his time where the Blazers need him and he will produce. He is the 14th roster spot on the end of the bench. This is about where he should be. But if Nurk goes down for a couple games. The Blazers will indeed use him when they need him. Trade him if possible sure.... But right now he is hurting nothing and might be the body they need at some point.
 
Shoot him like a broke leg horse

...was thinking something similar, taking him out behind here:
woodshed_Northfielder.jpg
 
He WILL take PT from Collins, i guarantee it. Stotts likes Myers and he likes experience.

I'm pretty sure MyLe's softness and insecurity is bad for our momentum and morale.

It's true that PA will keep paying him in case he gets waived, but think about all the potential players we could tryout with his spot. :yummy:

Yes, Stotts like Meyers and experience so much that, while Swanigan was in the regular rotation, Meyers wasn't even put into the game right away in the 4th while we led by 50pts.
Also we already have an open roster spot to "tryout potential players"

Think before you post FAMS
 
I think the fact that he played so little in a blow-out game shows that the organization is also ready to move on from him, but at the end of the day, until someone is willing to take him - he is here - so I would just let him play a little every once in a while in the hope that he either proves us all wrong or builds his trade value.

I'm all for it if helps increase his trade value and actually get something useful in return.
 
He WILL take PT from Collins, i guarantee it. Stotts likes Myers and he likes experience.

I'm pretty sure MyLe's softness and insecurity is bad for our momentum and morale.

It's true that PA will keep paying him in case he gets waived, but think about all the potential players we could tryout with his spot. :yummy:
I don't think Stotts likes Meyers. He started Aminu at center rather than Meyers, and Meyers barely got any playing time last year even after we lost Vonleh, Davis and Nurk.
 
Let's say our depth at Center goes Nurkic > Davis > Collins > Leonard.... We should probably not worry about it much anymore. Take at the look of the 4th center on every other team.
 
Let's say our depth at Center goes Nurkic > Davis > Collins > Leonard.... We should probably not worry about it much anymore. Take at the look of the 4th center on every other team.

a lot of teams don't even have four centers
 
I really hope Olshey can shed his salary. I'd really like to use that money to retain Pat and Davis. We might have to do something similar as what we did with Crabbe, trade him for another bad contract that is half as bad, then waive and stretch. Not sure if there is some kind of limit to how much you can use that provision though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top