magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
I'm sure there would be contending teams lining up to grab him. Teams can make moves to open up space.
And still keep their roster relevant? Sorry I don't see it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm sure there would be contending teams lining up to grab him. Teams can make moves to open up space.
I think the blazers are planning on building a contender. So that's why Aldridge is still on the team. If they assumed Aldridge would bolt; they should of taken the golden state deal.
That's a telling sign management doesn't buy into quick and the other hacks claiming he wants out
See, Aldridge hasn't necessarily said he wants out. From all things reported it sounds like he wants out only if the Blazers can't build a contender. Of course he'd stay if the Blazers are a contender.
The problem is right now, and this has been my whole point, the Blazers aren't a contender. They're about a .500 team, and that obviously won't keep Aldridge here.
I think they are more than a .500 team.
We'll certainly find out
I agree the team is improved, but I disagree that it's in a big way
Yes the bench is improved, but is that really saying anything? When you look at the bench you realize that it's still heavily dependent on first and second year players. The bench will still be a weak imo, just not historically weak like last year.
Then you look at the fact the Blazers will still be a weak rebounding and defensive team (with a head coach that doesn't seem to stress defense to boot).
Idk. I see a .500 team.
Improved to a pointless .500 team that will result in Aldridge leaving because he's tired of mediocrity
It's coming. Just wait.
It seems every season that we don't win the championship is pointless to you? Why do you even follow the team or post on a message board about them? There's a lot of more fulfilling hobbies out there for you.
I guess you could just ignore that there's a good possibility that he wants out. As a fan it doesn't really matter.
Hopefully the Blazers are planning for it if it comes to that.
I agree the team is improved, but I disagree that it's in a big way
Yes the bench is improved, but is that really saying anything? When you look at the bench you realize that it's still heavily dependent on first and second year players. The bench will still be a weak imo, just not historically weak like last year.
Then you look at the fact the Blazers will still be a weak rebounding and defensive team (with a head coach that doesn't seem to stress defense to boot).
Idk. I see a .500 team.
I guess you could just ignore that there's a good possibility that he wants out. As a fan it doesn't really matter.
Hopefully the Blazers are planning for it if it comes to that.
I'm down because the Blazers have not made moves in 3 whole days! Lazy bums.
Some people just aren't happy unless they have something to complain about.
Personally, I'd hate to be like that. I greatly prefer being a positive, upbeat person. Our team will be much better this season than last, and to me, that's a good thing.
BNM

We were a .500 team for 2/3 of a season with the worst bench in the league, until wear and tear on the starters began to take its toll. Just sayin'.Improved to a pointless .500 team that will result in Aldridge leaving because he's tired of mediocrity
It's coming. Just wait.
We were a .500 team for 2/3 of a season with the worst bench in the league, until wear and tear started kicking in. Just sayin'.
But there is a tier beneath championship-contender, what I've started calling the sub-contenders. It goes beyond simply "if you take out the contenders, these teams would win the darwinian free-for-all that would ensue." There's a hierarchy. And each team is positioned with certain opportunities and certain Achilles' heels which keep them from rising. In brief, here's what the teams have, what they need, and why they can't get over the hump:
hmm...POR didn't make this list of 11 "contenders" for the NBA title....(they had 12...but I don't see Lakers as a contender...this year...)
http://www.cbssports.com/nba/blog/e...s-identifying-eight-sub-contenders-in-the-nba
MIA, OKC, SAS & LAL were listed as contenders (last year...don't think LA would be considered this year)
I don't think anyone on this board, even mags, thinks were a contender this year. I think we will shock at lot of teams and we could get lucky and get to the 5-6th seed in the playoffs but the ceiling for this team is probably the second round.
I don't think anyone on this board, even mags, thinks were a contender this year. I think we will shock at lot of teams and we could get lucky and get to the 5-6th seed in the playoffs but the ceiling for this team is probably the second round.
Shh, if we're not raining on the parade constantly we're obviously delusional homers that just don't get it.
So what are your expectations for our team during the upcoming season?
44-38
I'm going with 41-41.
Should still be good enough to resign LMA.
Should still be good enough to resign LMA.
Depends on where this team is headed and the competition's growth curve.
It's good to keep one's self open to other options.
It was a joke.
