<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (BALLAHOLLIC? @ Jun 14 2007, 12:26 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="font-family:Arial">A Blue Ray player costs around $1,000. The PS3 is a $600 system, you're not paying for it...</span></div>I'm sure since you're 17, you don't understand how technology works, but I can tell you for a fact that it doesn't cost Sony $1,000 or anything close to that to make a bluray player. In fact, it's more like double digit cost, and it goes down everytime they make another one. You are paying for the bluray, just not nearly as much as retail like if you got a straight up bluray player.On another note, I don't know why you call it Blue Ray.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (noballer07 @ Jun 14 2007, 12:55 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Justice, I don't give a feezy. When you put it that way, Microsoft might have put an extra few hunned dollars to go towards internet even when people would pay to subscribe anyway. I paid for the system, but I'm not going to pay more just to play it; that's the issue. The PS3 costs so f*cking much because of the Bluray and all that good ish.</div>Microsoft doesn't give away free xbox live (not for the life of the system, anyway), because people love xbox live. They have established it as something worth paying for. Sony gives theirs away, because otherwise tardos wouldn't buy their system. If Microsoft
needed to make it free, they would. They don't. More people will buy their system without xbox live anyway (counterintuitive, I know).