- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,117
- Likes
- 10,950
- Points
- 113
When you have an organization that in the past took money from tobacco companies to argue against the risks of cigarette smoking and then moves on to taking money from oil and coal companies to argue against global warming you bet I'm going to be skeptical of anything they have to say.
I would argue that is the correct logic.
You argue wrong. Can't change what genetic fallacy is.
Exxon-Mobile could have committed all kinds of atrocities. If they say water is wet, they're right, regardless of their past.
Idso is quite specific about 300ppm, 600ppm, 1 degree C and 0.4 degrees C. Address the facts.
Last edited:




