- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 34,557
- Likes
- 25,731
- Points
- 113
well shit! cant argue with that kind of logic.
We know a thing or two, because we've seen a thing or two.
We are Old People, dum de dum dum dum.
barfo
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well shit! cant argue with that kind of logic.
NY got hit by hurricanes every 2-4 years in the 1800s. Those are nothing new.
The rivers there flood frequently.
And a lot of landfill under much of the place.
![]()
But... the sky is falling!
New Yorkers have spent the past four hundred years changing the coastal island they call home. It’s easy to forget (or not even realize) that Manhattan—or Mannahatta—was once a thin, marshy outcropping that protected the mainland from the ocean.
But a recent look at the earliest known map of New Amsterdam reminds us: you don’t get to eight million inhabitants without making a few landfills. Ellis Island? Built on landfill, in part. Rikers too. FDR Drive, the World Financial Center, and Battery Park City: yep, they’re all sitting on piles of dirt and trash. In fact, it’s remarkable the East River still exists—a plan from 1911 proposed infilling the river (and parts of the harbor) to reclaim fifty square miles of land.
Manhattan's topography—real and artificial—reentered public consciousness late last year, after Hurricane Sandy submerged parts of Lower Manhattan. Some engineers think it’s time to expand the shoreline even further to create “soft edges” to absorb the impact of the storm surge—a strange return to the city’s earliest incarnation as a marshland. As politicians and advocates are suddenly refocusing on the waterfront, the map is liable to change yet again—only this time, it'll be to repair and fortify the city against coming storms.
http://gizmodo.com/watch-new-york-city-s-boundaries-expand-over-250-years-496440467
well shit! cant argue with that kind of logic
Landfill floods, but it is somehow man made global warming, not the landfill the issue.A whole lot of that fill was done with garbage as the fill material. Then the wiser New Yorkers put a stop to dumping the shit in the harbor even if you wanted to fill a lagoon. So they began barging it out to sea and dump it in the Gulf Stream. I think they were still doing this in the late Sixties when I worked in the Time Life building. Trouble is some times they didn't get it all the way to the gulf stream, tired tug skipper, stream move east or what? Then it ended up on New Jersey shores, some even Mass. But most went to the North Sea and it was somebody else's problem.
First New Jersey bitched, then the World. What the hell do they do with it now? Burn it?
Landfill floods, but it is somehow man made global warming, not the landfill the issue.
Wise of you. The observations were done 1st hand with about 285 employees. About 11 successful recovery case succeeding in freeing themselves from alcohol addiction at a treatment center. None successfully freeing themselves from the weed. Too damn bad too, but then who am I to say? Perhaps they went on to other jobs and were very successful, I really don't know.
Landfill floods, but it is somehow man made global warming, not the landfill the issue.
Wait, so you are admitting the humans can affect the environment?
That's an important step for you. Congrats!
Really? And what personal insults are you talking about?
And yet according to you I'm a piece of shit? But what, that's not an insult, that's the truth? Fine, I'm a piece of shit.
Solution:
Carbon Tax of $25 every time you fly.
Carbon Tax of $100 for every car you have.
Carbon Tax of $1000 for every child you have.
Carbon Tax of $1 per square foot of your dwelling per year
Landfills are quite local.
And it's you attributing positions to me that I don't take.
Of course man can pollute. Every time you throw your cigarette butt out the car window.
What? So you don't believe that humans can affect the environment?
I really don't know.
maybe dog's are the cause for global warming? we should round up all the dogs and gas them.What? So you don't believe that humans can affect the environment?
I think they can, but they aren't much through CO2 emissions.
We absolutely were harming the environment with CFC emissions and stopping that was good.
you believe that scientists were correct about CFC but wrong on CO2?
people who believe that cigarette smoking isn't harmful?
Do you think these are questions? Or Accusations?
Just trying to get more information on what Denny actually believes. He said we were harming the environment, just trying to see if he really believes that we aren't now.
Right!
Now let us cut to the chase. What do you wish to do about it?
Ah! What war?Step one, stop the war on science.
This one was tried by Lenin and Carter. Neither got the desired result, only no boats.Step two, giant tax on homemade sailboats.
This one was tried by Lenin and Carter.
Step one, stop the war on science.
Step two, giant tax on homemade sailboats.
Wow! Look at the likes this turd got. Can anyone explain the synergy?
Wow! Look at the likes this turd got. Can anyone explain the synergy?
