Where are the "this team is so much more fun to watch" trolls?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
For the season the answer is yes for me, they are more fun to watch. Tonight's game of course not. If we have a serious starter injured it will get ugly muy rapido
 
No offense but you're one of the most bi-polar poster on this board when it comes to this stuff, so I wouldn't be making threads like these calling others out. Lillard alone makes this team more interesting than anything post-Roy era.
 
Blazinaway said:
For the season the answer is yes for me, they are more fun to watch. Tonight's game of course not. If we have a serious starter injured it will get ugly muy rapido
Click to expand...

I agree. On the whole, they are more fun to watch than last year. A big part of that is because of Lillard.
 
Yes King, I agree, Lillard is not fun to watch. Where are the trolls that says he is fun?!?
 
What a mistake. I missed a game far superior in effort to watch this clown Aldridge smile like Mr. Cool every time he fumbled yet another easy layup into yet another turnover. I'll watch the Stampede now, recorded on YouTube. Claver and Barton will at least give good effort. And not smile if they don't.
 
B-Roy said:
I agree. On the whole, they are more fun to watch than last year. A big part of that is because of Lillard.
Click to expand...

totally agree, this is going to be a long year, anyone who does not get that is not using common sense - then again the poster who started this thread often does not
 
B-Roy said:
I agree. On the whole, they are more fun to watch than last year. A big part of that is because of Lillard.
Click to expand...

Pretty much agreed. This team is fun to watch when its scoring and not caring about D but when we have a lot of injuries/foul trouble it gets ugly fast. Its a bad team with upside (upside being it can beat any team they play, just don't expect it on a regular basis).
 
It was fun to see Lillard do pretty well again, funny to watch Leonard run around like a one-man stampede, and Outlaw doing what he always did for us against us made me grin a bit.

This team isn't very good, but even in a blow-out loss to a mediocre team, there's fun stuff.
 
It's a problem with the whole NBA. Too many half-ass effort type games. The games would probably be more entertaining if they played less and spread them out.
 
Sinobas said:
It's a problem with the whole NBA. Too many half-ass effort type games. The games would probably be more entertaining if they played less and spread them out.
Click to expand...

58-game season (balanced; play each opponent twice). Two or three days off between games. 12-team playoff where the top 4 teams get a bye in the 1st round while the next 8 teams play a best of 5.
 
Sinobas said:
It's a problem with the whole NBA. Too many half-ass effort type games. The games would probably be more entertaining if they played less and spread them out.
Click to expand...

an idea I've supported for years. Less quantity of games = more quality of play because of extra downtime to heal, practice time to get better & individual games being more important. NBA fans aren't nearly as geeked out about historical records as say baseball fans, so I don't buy the argument for keeping the season's amount of games the same for the sake of continuity of records.

STOMP
 
STOMP said:
an idea I've supported for years. Less quantity of games = more quality of play because of extra downtime to heal, practice time to get better & individual games being more important. NBA fans aren't nearly as geeked out about historical records as say baseball fans, so I don't buy the argument for keeping the season's amount of games the same for the sake of continuity of records.

STOMP
Click to expand...

I think many agree, but would owners and players accept less money? LOL
 
21st in Pace! This run 'n gun stuff is fun to watch! :MARIS61:

Stotts is in over his head. He has no idea how to use LMA, and has given way too much control and freedom to Lillard on just jacking up 3s.
 
STOMP said:
an idea I've supported for years. Less quantity of games = more quality of play because of extra downtime to heal, practice time to get better & individual games being more important. NBA fans aren't nearly as geeked out about historical records as say baseball fans, so I don't buy the argument for keeping the season's amount of games the same for the sake of continuity of records.

STOMP
Click to expand...

Ticket sales and TV contracts. Fewer games means fewer dollars.
 
OdenRoyLMA2 said:
Lillard alone makes this team more interesting than anything post-Roy era.
Click to expand...

...and this is an example of why, left-handed semi no-look bounce pass on the break!

[video=youtube;LjkSta-PGuQ]
 
Aldridge, a stiff natural center, would bobble that pass every time.
 
I miss the Best of 5 first round. You lose game 1 and you're in trouble. More exciting.
 
Could be worse. We could be the Lakers and have high expectations and 4 future first ballot Hall of Famers and be butt shitty.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

BGrantFan
Biggest Night of the Year on S2 and No Mods Are Here
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Denny Crane
Denny Crane
B
Best section to watch a game?
Replies
20
Views
1K
Buzz Killington
B
Stevenson
What's your one word to describe this team? Mine: Boring
2 3 4
Replies
95
Views
3K
Orion Bailey
Orion Bailey
H.C.
Blazers and the 3 ball.
2 3
Replies
66
Views
3K
Strenuus
Strenuus
Denny Crane
Funny Blazers news: Evan Turner trolls Nick Young on Twitter
Replies
1
Views
714
Paine Tablet
Paine Tablet

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top