Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For profiling purposeswhy is kobe on that list?
I agree that Jordan is the best ever, but I think it is funny that Jordan seems to get a pass for taking 2 years off for baseball. Everyone assumes he would have won 8 in row, but the fact is he stepped away from the game (whatever the real reason may be), shouldn't that be seen as a negative?I would say Jordan as he would have possibly had 8 in a row if he didn't take 2 years off for baseball. James is very close.
Kobe was Jordan clone but not quite as good.why is kobe on that list?
Jordan doesn't need "would've won 8" to be better than LeBron. He won SIX.I agree that Jordan is the best ever, but I think it is funny that Jordan seems to get a pass for taking 2 years off for baseball. Everyone assumes he would have won 8 in row, but the fact is he stepped away from the game (whatever the real reason may be), shouldn't that be seen as a negative?
Yeah, I'm not comparing him to Lebron. I just think it's strange he essentially gets a pass for taking two years off.Jordan doesn't need "should've won 8" to be better than LeBron. He won SIX.
I don't think he gets a pass. He wouldn't have necessarily won. The team had to be rebuilt with Kukoc and Steve Kerr, and ultimately Rodman for Jordan to win three more.Yeah, I'm not comparing him to Lebron. I just think it's strange he essentially gets a pass for taking two years off.
Because HCP would complain otherwise.why is kobe on that list?
LMFAOI refuse to vote until Raymond Felton is added to the poll.
I would say Jordan as he would have possibly had 8 in a row if he didn't take 2 years off for baseball. James is very close.
I'd put Duncan > Kobe on the all time list. Kobe is borderline top 10For profiling purposes
But thats a hypothetical. It isnt a fact he would have won two more. Thought you dont do hypotheticals??????
Wow, you didn't even make it a whole day. You not only read my post, you even responded to it. So much for keeping your weird.
By the way I NEVER said that I don't do hypotheticals. I said I seldom do. In the Jordan issue I said he could have POSSIBLY won 2 more. Do you disagree?
I use this excuse when it doesn't fit my narrative.I dont eve n know what that means.. Must be grumpy old man talk.
I don't know. I wont comment on hypothetical. I'm a hypocrite.I use this excuse when it doesn't fit my narrative.
cupwizier:
Did I not tell you a few days ago that I don't really get into hypotheticals? and now here you are again attacking me because I don't go through hypotheticals for you. You didn't up the ante as you clearly stated "So you think losing two of our best defensive starters and our first for Tobias Harris is an upgrade?" That certainly looks like you are claiming I was willing to trade both Harkless and Aminu plus our pick and now you claim that's not what you were doing. It is really getting harder to have a discussion with you when you continually come at me and put me down for my answers as well as changing the narrative. I will gladly give you opinions on deals that ACTUALLY happen when they happen, but I don't play fantasy basketball in a forum for the most part as as far as I will typically go is voice an opinion if I think an idea is good, bad or maybe not even eligible to be done. Some like to do fantasy trades and I have indulged a few times, but just not my game. and I don't begrudge them for doing so just as you should allow me the freedom as well to not participate if I so choose.
Man. All I needed to do was read the first sentence to know not to read any further.
Orion BailyL
IF you don't deal in hypothetical, then how can you tell other people they are wrong on their hypothetical? don't you see the direct and obvious double standard?
-
And you think I am attacking you? LMAO.. you have no clue what an attack is.....
I'm not gonna read any more of your post because it starts out way too delusional for me to be interested in.
Enjoy your time here.
Ah, another name calling personal attack from you. It's not very effective though.
Notice in my post you responded to I said don't really get into hypotheticals which means that isn't my game but doesn't mean I NEVER do hypotheticals. You also fabricated what I said when you claimed I was suggesting trading both Harkless and Aminu for Tobias Harris and then you admitted later that you knew I didn't when you got called out on it.
Now also notice in your post above that you state "I'm not gonna read any more of your post because it starts out way too delusional for me to be interested in." and then less than 24 hours you have responded to my posts. Will power definitely isn't a strength of yours. Why is that?
Like I mentioned earlier to you that it has become apparent you take offense to pretty much anything I have posted and rather than have discussions you choose to take the low road. Why do you feel that is necessary on your part? If you want to continue taking pot shots at me, so be it, but maybe for the sake of the forum you can try and become a reasonable poster again and not obsess over every one of my words.
Your post is completely clueless.
I never said I wasn't going to respond to you, I said I wasn't going to read any further at that moment. A perfect example of how you twist shit around for your own narrative. But you wont see this because you only see (or read) what you want.
You seem to think i'm offended by you. That's funny. Your posts are like an irritating gnat, but nothing to get offended over, but like most irritating gnats, you get out the bug spray or wad up a paper and crush it.
"Waaaaaa.... You made a snide comment. Waaah you insulted me personally( cause I take every comment personal)".
"Waaahhh "
"waaaahh"
"waaaahhh"
You could use a mirror. LOL.
Also, I haven't taken offense at anything, I just have fun calling out mega hypocritical posts like yourself.
Like I said enjoy your time here. I will continue to call you out as long as you post such contradictory crap.
Illl only deal in hypotheticals, when it fits my narrative. When it doesnt, I wont. LMAO.......
You can take that as a personal insult or whatever you want. Its obvious your skin is thinner than thin.
You should change your name to THIN Lizzy.
You think you can come in here and put down others opinions but cant handle it when people call you out on your hypocrisy.
Waaah waaaah waaahh
Go whine to Sly some more....
Oh yeah. How old are you again?
HAHAHAHA
I am now starting to understand the O-live hatred. Not all but some of you are ... well...
Lol.....
Maybe this weekend when I am bored, I will put together a snapshot of all of your hypocritical posts for you to review all in one sitting, just how ass backwards some of your posts are. and how you spin things to meet your criteria.
Again. Enjoy your time here.

That was quite a meltdown bailey but how do you respond to my post if you aren't going to read them?
I will do us both a favor and put you on ignore and I suggest you do the same thing as we will both probably feel better.
another ASSumption of a meltdown. You are a rook here and know not about me. I just got you to ignore me. Mission accomplished. Now you can be grumpy old poster to others. LMAO.
And this is the climactic peak I expected.
Someone so thin skinned would use the ignore button rather than look themselves in the mirror when called out. But yet doesn't mind calling others out on their opinions and telling them they are wrong in their opinion.
I LOVE it.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

That's the sad thing about this country, virtually every citizen gets a vote. I think only landowners should vote.Jordan.
4 people who never saw Jordan play voted for Lebron
