Why no Dante or Bayless?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

SpanishFly

Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
523
Likes
1
Points
18
If ever Nate was going to perhaps give Dante a 5 minute chance I thought last night might be it with Webs early fouls and crappy play, but of course nothing. And is Bayless still hurt or is that just Nate again going with Blake? Gets more and more frustrating, we have injuries and Webs sucking, if Dante can't get a chance now will he ever?
 
I sometimes think we should bring in the young guys sooner when we get good lead... they will be hungrier and won't coast. By sticking to your starters so long they sometime relax and we lose lead.
 
It's because Nate is mismanaging the roster again. He is a control freak, and a micro manager.
 
dante is pretty much our only option at the 3 when webby gets in foul trouble. aside from you know, playing a sg there.
 
Because Dante wears briefs instead of Boxers. :tsktsk:
 
I think Dante is better than Webster. I would give Dante all Webs minutes.
 
If ever Nate was going to perhaps give Dante a 5 minute chance I thought last night might be it with Webs early fouls and crappy play, but of course nothing. And is Bayless still hurt or is that just Nate again going with Blake? Gets more and more frustrating, we have injuries and Webs sucking, if Dante can't get a chance now will he ever?

There was a report that Bayless was still questionable with his sprained ankle. I think he is healthy enough now that no injury excuses needed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top