Will Senator Merkley Be Relected?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Smith was, and will be, the last Senator that represented Oregonians outside of Portland.

Not that I want to get involved in a political discussion but I think Merkley has done a decent job at representing the whole state. As long as Oregonians don't elect a Ted Cruz type, I won't complain.
 
Geez, This turkey votes for a fiasco like Obama Care and you want a redo??

Damn, It is hard to fathom the depth of dumb!
 
Not that I want to get involved in a political discussion but I think Merkley has done a decent job at representing the whole state. As long as Oregonians don't elect a Ted Cruz type, I won't complain.

He doesn't represent the farmers & ranchers- and many others.

He's basically a liberal "yes man". At least Smith voted what he felt was right more. And he looked out for the interests of others outside Portland. That said, I think Merkley is a decent man. I have met him and like him.
 
Smith was, and will be, the last Senator that represented Oregonians outside of Portland.

Smith represented his own business interests and his own personal views.

Sometimes they coincided with rural Oregonians, sometimes they didn't.
 
Merkley is a well respected senator who brings crediblity to the state of Oregon and he has not forgotten Oregon's issues while at DC.

he is shoe in for the next election
 
Not long after I was notified that I would no longer be covered by the health plan I had for 52 years, provided by my employer, now former employer, I sent the following mail to Merkley,
Wyden, and DeFazio. Fallowing my mail is Merkleys response in which he does not even address the main question.


Senator,

How can it be when you voted for this ACA that you didn't know that people covered by their employer
or former employer in the case of retirees, would be dropped by the employer?
The law contains a Tax on the employers for each person that they would continue to cover.
Why was this tax implemented? It can not be to obtain revenue to cover other people.

If it was, that was very dumb as well as totally unfair to the employers as well as the employees and retirees.

It sure looks to me like the tax was intended to encourage employers to drop retirees and spouses to force more people into the exchanges.

You fellas really deserve a just reward for this plan.

Barrack Obama deserves his too for telling us at least 50 times that "If you like your current healthcare
You can Keep it!" A Complete lie

MarAzul


This is Merkley's reply with no mention of the question he was asked to address.

Dear MarAzul,

Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns about ongoing implementation of the health care reform law, also called the Affordable Care Act. I share your frustration with the unacceptable dysfunction and delays and I appreciate hearing from you.

Despite these challenges, I support the Affordable Care Act because it represents a significant improvement on a broken system that, before the Affordable Care Act, allowed insurance companies to subject almost all Oregonians to constantly increasing insurance prices, kicked many off their coverage when they needed it most, and left hundreds of thousands of Oregonians without health insurance at all. We need to fix the problems, and I will work with anyone from either party to do so, but we can't go back to the broken health care system that failed so many Oregonians.

I continue to be extraordinarily frustrated by the continuing technical problems with enrollment on the state and federal exchange websites, and concerned that these problems will prevent many people from enrolling in plans in time for their coverage to start on January 1, 2014. No one should experience a gap in coverage due to technological factors outside of their control. To help people potentially affected by the delay in insurance enrollment, I have called for a change to allow Oregonians to get coverage effective on January 1, 2014, even if they sign up late in January.

One of the central goals of the Affordable Care Act was to expand access to high quality health insurance plans for those who did not like what they had or did not have any options at all, while allowing those who did like their insurance plan to keep it. By allowing consumers this choice, the law gave potentially affected consumers the power to decide whether they wanted to switch plans or keep the plan they had. Today, because insurance companies have changed their plans over the past few years to maximize profits, most of the plans that would have been grandfathered are no longer offered by insurance companies. At the same time, insurance companies signed people up for new or changed plans that didn't meet the basic consumer protections in the Affordable Care Act, and didn't warn people that their plan would eventually be discontinued. As a result, many consumers in Oregon and across the country don't have the choice to keep their insurance plan because it wasn't offered in 2010 when the Affordable Care Act became law.

I believe it's unfair to make consumers pay the price for their insurance company deny

Jeffrey A. Merkley
United States Senator



It appears the man had and has no clue how insurance works or that the majority of Americans that had health Care coverage were provided such by employers with self insured plans.

I can't vote for a man this clueless about such a major issue. Destroying what many people had for the sake of a few that do not is mindlessly ignorant The consequences this are still incomplete, with more pain to follow.
 
Do you really think he wrote you personally?

That form letter may not have even been written by his own staff.

Not that I see anything wrong with the letter, but I think it's a mistake to assume it somehow is evidence of his understanding, or lack thereof, on the issue.

barfo
 
Do you really think he wrote you personally?

That form letter may not have even been written by his own staff.

Not that I see anything wrong with the letter, but I think it's a mistake to assume it somehow is evidence of his understanding, or lack thereof, on the issue.

barfo

I intend to ask him live, the next chance I get. I hope it is a large crowd.
 
Not long after I was notified that I would no longer be covered by the health plan I had for 52 years, provided by my employer, now former employer,

I'm just curious, why do you no longer work for that employer?
 
I'm planning on doing everything I can to help Merkley enjoy 99 weeks of unemployment benefits.
 
I'm just curious, why do you no longer work for that employer?

Well I retired after many years of working there. I guess former employer is the correct status for a retiree to use.
 
Do you really think he wrote you personally?

That form letter may not have even been written by his own staff.

Not that I see anything wrong with the letter, but I think it's a mistake to assume it somehow is evidence of his understanding, or lack thereof, on the issue.

barfo

Oh yeah, I probably wrote to Mark Hatfield five or six time while he was one of our Senators. I am sure his staff answered for him too, however I do not recall it reading like
they never read your letter. He always answered your question. By the way, Merkleys lack of an answer is another lie in not telling what he knows as true.
 
Geez, This turkey votes for a fiasco like Obama Care and you want a redo??

Damn, It is hard to fathom the depth of dumb!

So he voted for Obamacare. Forget everything else he may have done. He voted for Obamacare, damnit!
 
Last edited:
So he voted for Obamacare. Forget everything else he may have done. He voted for Obamacare, damnit!

He also voted to bann the 100 watt light bulb. That be pretty dumb, as if there needed to be another.
 
I intend to ask him live, the next chance I get. I hope it is a large crowd.

I hope, for the sake of the crowd, that you are more articulate when you speak than when you write.

barfo
 
I hope, for the sake of the crowd, that you are more articulate when you speak than when you write.

barfo

Why don't you do some research for us. See if you can prove this guy wrong.

"Women always maintain that giving birth is way more painful than a guy getting kicked in the nuts.

Well, after another beer, and some heavy deductive thinking, I have come up with the answer to that question.
Getting kicked in the nuts is more painful than having a baby; and here is the reason for my conclusion. A year
or so after giving birth, a woman will often say, "It might be nice to have another child." On the other hand, you
never hear a guy say, "You know, I think I would like another kick in the nuts." I rest my case.
Time for another beer."
 
Why don't you do some research for us. See if you can prove this guy wrong.

"Women always maintain that giving birth is way more painful than a guy getting kicked in the nuts.

Well, after another beer, and some heavy deductive thinking, I have come up with the answer to that question.
Getting kicked in the nuts is more painful than having a baby; and here is the reason for my conclusion. A year
or so after giving birth, a woman will often say, "It might be nice to have another child." On the other hand, you
never hear a guy say, "You know, I think I would like another kick in the nuts." I rest my case.
Time for another beer."

Read that in the dentists chair this morning, made me laugh.

barfo
 
Caption this photo of Merkley:

BeccPisCAAA01yF.jpg
 
"If you are going to sneak a photo of me, at least hold the damn camera steady!"

barfo
 
Oregon has tipped. No Republican stands a chance. It doesn't matter who the Democrats run, Oregonians are on autopilot. They'll just vote the party line.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top