<div class="quote_poster">AMS_ice Wrote</div><div class="quote_post">Jason Kidd has proven time and time again that he can shoot and score. But being the kind of player he is, he opts to pass first and shoot later. Williams' game is far from Kidd's. Sure he and Marbury shoots better. But a lot of players can shoot as well or even better. But they are not in the same class as Kidd is. Williams' game is closer to Marbury's. They both look for their shot first. And believe this. As soon as Williams take over the point after Kidd has gone, he will match Marbury's ego. They both may be better shooters than Kidd. But Jason Kidd is a far better player than both of them.</div>
Kidd is a fairly bad shooter. Look at his career field goal percentages. He hovers around 40%. That is very low for a point guard. Shooting is Kidd's greatest weakness.
I've seen Williams play in person, he looks to pass the ball far more than Marbury. Williams simply takes the shots that Kidd would have put up had he had confidence in his shot. I think that Kidd's greatest offensive asset is being able to keep the team in the right tempo at the right time. You can't have a team run 100% for 48 minutes. Williams, in my opinion, has that same tempo instinct. Kidd's will always be better with out a doubt, but that does not lessen the arguement that Williams' offensive game is closer to Kidd's than Marbury's.
Also, don't forget that half of Marbury's offense is exploding to the hoop (at least a few years ago). If any thing, Marbury's game is closer to Iverson's.