Wilson Chandler to POR?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
KeepOnRollin said:
People wanted to strait cut Crabbe last year (look how that would have turned out) and now people want to trade CJ. Patience pays off with our young guys.

Only players I am giving them if I am Olshey is Claver and TRob. Take it or leave it. I am fine if you leave it.
Click to expand...
I still have yet to see anything from Crabbe, CJ, or Claver to think that any one of the 3 are more than fringe NBA players. T-Rob and Barton have shown a little more, but their status is tenuous at best too. If you can trade any one of the 5 for a solid rotational player - you do it.
 
BigGameDamian said:
Lotto pick doesn't mean squat if the player doesn't perform like one.
Click to expand...

With all those consistent minutes he's gotten right? Just because I don't like him doesn't mean I believe he's gotten a real shot. His game is just repetitive in Portland. He's a ball dominant guard. He needs to be elsewhere where can have the opportunity to be just that.
 
magnifier661 said:
Playing only the equivalent of half a season? Really?
Click to expand...
I haven't played any games yet.... So I must have unlimited potential.

Good players find a way to force their way onto the court. This is CJ's third year. He has shown little to no improvement and when he's been on the court, I don't see the skill set to be any more than a 9th/10th man in a rotation.
 
tester551 said:
I haven't played any games yet.... So I must have unlimited potential.

Good players find a way to force their way onto the court. This is CJ's third year. He has shown little to no improvement and when he's been on the court, I don't see the skill set to be any more than a 9th/10th man in a rotation.
Click to expand...
This is CJ's second year.
 
tester551 said:
I haven't played any games yet.... So I must have unlimited potential.

Good players find a way to force their way onto the court. This is CJ's third year. He has shown little to no improvement and when he's been on the court, I don't see the skill set to be any more than a 9th/10th man in a rotation.
Click to expand...

I'm not a cj fan but I watched him in college and even in the dleague (hear me out) and he hasn't been allowed to play his game here. He needs the ball in his hands, working the pick and roll. So far in Portland he's pretty much been a catch and shoot player, which isn't his game. I feel like it's best for both parties if he was elsewhere.
 
And for the record, I much prefer our ball movement system to one on one nate ball. I'm just saying that's the type of the team CJ belongs on. Nate ball.

For example I don't think Roy would have fit in Stotts' system either.
 
tester551 said:
I haven't played any games yet.... So I must have unlimited potential.

Good players find a way to force their way onto the court. This is CJ's third year. He has shown little to no improvement and when he's been on the court, I don't see the skill set to be any more than a 9th/10th man in a rotation.
Click to expand...

Second year. There were better players available but he still has time.
 
tester551 said:
I haven't played any games yet.... So I must have unlimited potential.

Good players find a way to force their way onto the court. This is CJ's third year. He has shown little to no improvement and when he's been on the court, I don't see the skill set to be any more than a 9th/10th man in a rotation.
Click to expand...
Wrong... This is cj's second season. And before injury, he was putting up solid bench performances... You guys forget too easily... Even on 82games.com, he was the highest differential for his position.

We gave up on freeland, then the next season he dominated. We gave up on Leonard and now he's performing. What we haven't done is give CJ a good shot to prove himself. Sorry I disagree with all of you
 
julius said:
Portland can't absorb almost 7 million dollars without giving up something, so a player would HAVE to be included.
Click to expand...

I know that. I was responding to the point that we would have to give up a "prospect" vs Memphis who gave up Prince. It could be Wright/Claver
 
Nothing new on this? I can't help but think Chris Haynes would have the scoop.
 
Quick used to break news.

Haynes was the Woj of the PNW.

We have writers but no 'insiders' now.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, Jabari seems cool, but he doesn't seem to have the contacts in the front office Haynes did.
 
Who says it wasn't correct? They want a first and we don't want to give it to them. So no deal right now. That doesn't make it incorrect though.
 
BlazerCaravan said:
Thank god; I feel like our journalists used to ruin everything.
Click to expand...
100% this! I don't give a rats ass about this inside information shit. I would rather our team keep their cards close to their chest to avoid players worrying about shit.
 
What does it mean that crabbe was not even there in street clothes?
 
Eastoff said:
What does it mean that crabbe was not even there in street clothes?
Click to expand...
It means he was busy packing his bags.

What a shame, I think Crabbe has some serious potential, but this team is obviously in win now mode.
 
I hope crabbe isn't traded. I love his game and see potential in him. More potential on our team than Cj. Teams are always in need of 3 and D wings.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Can Wilson Chandler be had?
Replies
7
Views
498
NOVoodoo
NOVoodoo
T
Wilson Chandler to Philly
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
BonesJones
BonesJones
cmeese47
Official Petition to Trade _______ for a defensive big
2
Replies
50
Views
3K
cmeese47
cmeese47
Blaze01
POR needs to REBUILD not reload
3 4 5
Replies
141
Views
7K
EL PRESIDENTE
EL PRESIDENTE
BrewCityBuck
Wilson Chandler
Replies
10
Views
1K
MaRdYC26
MaRdYC26

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top