WOJ: Dame wants the super max extension

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

B-Roy

If it takes months
Joined
Oct 14, 2008
Messages
31,766
Likes
25,047
Points
113
https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/st...-search-shape-future-franchise-damian-lillard

Holy shit the news dumps we're getting today. Anyone have insider? I assume the information here is fed directly from OLSHEY:

Once Portland Trail Blazers star Damian Lillard stopped threatening to request a trade, everyone understood his inevitable moment of truth: His future remained bound to the summer of 2022, not 2021. Extensions were always automatic for him, and that's no longer the case.

Lillard wants a two-year, $107 million extension in July, and he and his agent need the next general manager to sell ownership on the idea. As much as anything, this cuts to the core of the Blazers' search process. His desire for an extension into his advanced NBA years has turned into a battle for the franchise's future, an existential threat to reshaping and redirecting the organization in a post-playoff reality.

The prospects of Portland extending Lillard, 31, beyond his $48.8 million in 2024-2025 to pay him $51 million at 35 years old and $55 million at 36 years old threatens to turn an asset of a contract into an albatross.

As former President of Basketball Operations and GM Neil Olshey exits the Blazers, the process to hire his successor will soon be underway. Portland is deciding whether it'll hire a firm to research and recommend candidates, sources said. Bert Kolde, the long-time ownership executive and right-hand man to the late Paul Allen, will direct the search again. He's hired several GMs in his tenure.

The Blazers will be wise to expect every candidate to come armed with two important questions: What are owner Jody Allen's plans to keep or sell the team? And more immediately, would a new GM have autonomy to rebuild the franchise not around but without Lillard?

In the past year, Lillard and his camp have been thwarted on several leverage plays -- Jason Kidd as coach, trading CJ McCollum and four first-round picks for Ben Simmons. Most of all, they lost the confidence that the Blazers had a top basketball executive and ownership willing to make Lillard's contract the highest single-season deal in league history at $55.3 million in 2027.
 
I literally paid so you don't have to. This article is crazy:

Among several top-level GM candidates who fit the profile of Portland's applicant pool, there's no enthusiasm to grant Lillard his massive extension contract through the 2026-27 season. In fact, several executives told ESPN they would be far more interested in the Blazers job with ownership's blessing to move Lillard sooner than later.

Now, Lillard's group is privately selling the idea of trading his veteran teammates with value and rebuilding around him -- on that extension. Some candidates initially believed that Lillard's reps would have input with ownership on the next GM, but that has faded quickly. Rival GMs knew they had to work directly with Olshey to get deals done with the Blazers, that he had full autonomy to make decisions. Those seeking Olshey's old job believe they need to sell themselves to ownership, not to those surrounding the star player.

Three teams with interest in Lillard told ESPN that they are waiting on him to make an offseason trade demand before calling Portland. If Lillard asks out, they know the Blazers will lose some leverage in the asking price -- and are waiting on it. Philadelphia made an offer, but New York never did, league sources said. Lillard's reps offered mixed messages on the star's intentions to stay or go, and rival teams say that the star's camp had real concerns about Olshey's willingness to recommend the extension to ownership in 2022.

For now, the Blazers are telling people that they'll take their time on the search, that they won't be moved by anyone's agenda. The battle lines are real on Damian Lillard's future and leverage is ever-evolving. As much as anything, this fight for control of the franchise's future is a cold, sober exercise of balancing assets and albatrosses.
 
I wonder who Blazer fans will side with on this one....Neil Olshey, or Damian Lillard.


I don't give two shits what hamstringing it does to the franchise, you pay the man. The ownership group is worth like 30 billion. Pay the lux tax, or risk alienating the only player worth his weight in gold on the team (and arguably the best player to ever play for the Blazers) and souring the fanbase to the point where the attendance #'s pre 06 look good.
 
I wonder who Blazer fans will side with on this one....Neil Olshey, or Damian Lillard.


I don't give two shits what hamstringing it does to the franchise, you pay the man. The ownership group is worth like 30 billion. Pay the lux tax, or risk alienating the only player worth his weight in gold on the team (and arguably the best player to ever play for the Blazers) and souring the fanbase to the point where the attendance #'s pre 06 look good.
and the new TV deal will inevitably drive the cap up. I think the shock value of 50 mil is the only holdup, but as a percentage of the new cap, it's going to be about what he's earning now. But painting his deal as what's hamstringing this team is a hilarious take.
 
ask for a refund. that shit ain't worth it.

It's just one month so whatever. This is the most interesting piece of information if true:

Now, Lillard's group is privately selling the idea of trading his veteran teammates with value and rebuilding around him -- on that extension. Some candidates initially believed that Lillard's reps would have input with ownership on the next GM, but that has faded quickly. Rival GMs knew they had to work directly with Olshey to get deals done with the Blazers, that he had full autonomy to make decisions. Those seeking Olshey's old job believe they need to sell themselves to ownership, not to those surrounding the star player.

The rest is mostly spin from Olshey's perspective, but I'd wager there is a hint of truth there. Or at least what Olshey perceived to be a threat.
 
I wonder who Blazer fans will side with on this one....Neil Olshey, or Damian Lillard.


I don't give two shits what hamstringing it does to the franchise, you pay the man. The ownership group is worth like 30 billion. Pay the lux tax, or risk alienating the only player worth his weight in gold on the team (and arguably the best player to ever play for the Blazers) and souring the fanbase to the point where the attendance #'s pre 06 look good.
I give many shits and he ain't worth it, he doesn't like it good bye
 
Also, I think what you can get out of this is that Olshey lost a power struggle with Lillard. I think it's pretty clear Olshey didn't want to give Lillard his 2 year supermax extension, and that was a straining point between the two's relationship.

For now Lillard has won.
 
8b1.png
 
Like that's your tactic to get back at the franchise? Go after Dame?

Air out dirty laundry about Jody/Bert, talk about how meddlesome PA was, or run that bus all over Terry once more, maybe people will buy it, but to paint Dame as a villain is absolutely hilarious. Dude could be mayor of Portland tomorrow if he wanted to with his Q rating. He's bulletproof.

It's just funny-- I think this galvanizes the franchise even more.
 
Like that's your tactic to get back at the franchise? Go after Dame?

Air out dirty laundry about Jody/Bert, talk about how meddlesome PA was, maybe people will buy it, but to paint Dame as a villain is absolutely hilarious. Dude could be mayor of Portland tomorrow if he wanted to with his Q rating. He's bulletproof.

It's just funny-- I think this galvanizes the franchise even more.

Olshey is a schmoozer, he's not gonna go after the big wigs signing the checks. Thats how he got into the league, how he kept his job for so long, and how he will probably end up with another one. He's shown his true colors now to everyone though. A real piece of shit.
 
Like that's your tactic to get back at the franchise? Go after Dame?

Air out dirty laundry about Jody/Bert, talk about how meddlesome PA was, or run that bus all over Terry once more, maybe people will buy it, but to paint Dame as a villain is absolutely hilarious. Dude could be mayor of Portland tomorrow if he wanted to with his Q rating. He's bulletproof.

It's just funny-- I think this galvanizes the franchise even more.

There are some subtle shots at Dame (and specifically at his camp), but I'm not sure what Olshey's aim is here? Is this targeted towards GM candidates? Basically telling them to beware of Dame's camp? Dame wants 100 million and you shouldn't give it to him because he'll become an albatross? That's the part I don't understand. If this is targeted towards Blazers fans I think most would just side with Dame. For general NBA followers I don't know what they're getting out of this.

I think most general NBA fans would be worried about paying Dame that much when he's 36 though.

Aside from all the spin (the "maniacal" sentence about Paul Allen was literally written by Olshey) though, there is just some interesting information in here.
 
If nothing less it ensures he won't get traded...teams won't want to take on that salary chunk at this point in his career. It keeps him a Blazer
people said the same thing about john wall, but wizards got rid of his contract and then they got rid of wesbrooks contract too
 
Oddly, I think the fact he played through injury the first few months this season and adjusted his game makes the idea of extending him into his mid 30s makes sense. He's shown the ability to adjust his game by adding elements in prior seasons, now he has shown that he can still be effective as the tread starts to wear thin.
 
Interestingly, regarding ESPN+, if you're in Australia, it's free (no idea why). So if you have a VPN and can set it to Australia, you can do that to get free access when you want it.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top