magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
He played Center for us a majority of the time.
Absolutely False.
http://espn.go.com/nba/player/gamelog/_/id/3437/year/2012/jj-hickson
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He played Center for us a majority of the time.
You guys do realize this is the nba, right? It's not like we have any chance of winning a championship anyway, may as well enjoy wins and making the playoffs.
I have waited my whole lifetime to see the Blazers win a championship. Im realizing more and more that when some teams win its just the perfect storm and that it is always going to very difficult as a small market team. Yes I want to win a championship, but right now I would be ECSTATIC with the 2nd round to start
Having a power-forward like Aldridge limits Robinson's court time, thus hindering his development in season.
That's 2012-13. Try again.
Actually I'd say the analysis completely accounts for those factors. Maybe Robinson or McCollum makes an impact, but it's hardly anything people should count on.
Changes: The Blazers were threatening for a playoff spot last year, but fell apart down the stretch because they lacked depth, with arguably the worst bench in the league. That has changed with the addition of Dorrell Wright and Earl Watson, and bringing in Robin Lopez to start at center will boost the team’s defense.
Hmm, let's re-read it.
Their analysis of the improvement of our bench only mentions Wright and Watson (replacing Pavlovic and Price). However the bench also improved by replacing Nolan Smith with CJ McCollum and by Robinson pushing Freeland farther down the depth chart.
Your statement of, "Maybe Robinson or McCollum makes an impact, but it's hardly anything people should count on." is the very definition of what I called "a very conservative projection"--ignoring what could very well be significant additions, and basing a prediction on the assumption that they provide little contribution.
Please think for a second about what you just typed.
You guys do realize this is the nba, right? It's not like we have any chance of winning a championship anyway, may as well enjoy wins and making the playoffs.
"Honest sportsmanship?" What the fuck is that? This is professional sports.
You should never count on rookies to be major contributors (Lillard is the exception, not the rule) and Robinson hasn't shown enough in his first year that people should expect anything.
still holding out hope that once Stern is gone, Silver might actually allow a smaller market team to win it.
You should never count on rookies to be major contributors (Lillard is the exception, not the rule) and Robinson hasn't shown enough in his first year that people should expect anything.
The Spurs were less than 30 seconds away from winning it this year so I think the small market conspiracy theory has run its course.
I don't know man. SAS is a pretty small market team and are only trumped by the Lakers for most titles in 2000 on.
No I absolutely agree Hickson played center for most the 2012-13 season. I commented that Hickson still worked well in 2011-12, being a back up to Aldridge.
exactly. "professional" sports -- where players don't get paid millions of dollars to intentionally lose. guess you walked right into that one.
Fair enough, but he played next to Aldridge a decent amount during that partial season, after we picked him up on waivers. And after all of the arguing, Robinson never established any kind of game or role in his first year and still needs court time to figure out what kind of player he's going to be in the NBA, something that Hickson had already done in Cleveland before going to Sacramento and then bouncing to us.
You should never count on rookies to be major contributors (Lillard is the exception, not the rule) and Robinson hasn't shown enough in his first year that people should expect anything.
Im not saying it cant happen or that I dont want it to happen Im just saying that Im ok with taking steps to get there and hope that perfect storm I mentioned happens in the meantime. No matter how good your team is there is more luck and timing and match-ups than anything.
The Spurs were less than 30 seconds away from winning it this year so I think the small market conspiracy theory has run its course.
GMs (who run these professional franchises) manipulate their rosters all the time to jockey for better draft position ... tanking in other words. The players don't necessarily get to set the strategic plan.
the population of San Antonio within the city, according to the 2010 census, was over 1.3 million people which ranked the city seventh in the U.S. at the time. i wouldn't call them a small market.
the population of San Antonio within the city, according to the 2010 census, was over 1.3 million people which ranked the city seventh in the U.S. at the time. i wouldn't call them a small market.
the population of San Antonio within the city, according to the 2010 census, was over 1.3 million people which ranked the city seventh in the U.S. at the time. i wouldn't call them a small market.
In the past 14 seasons (since 99-00), there have been 130 guards who played at least 15 mpg over at least 50 games in their rookie seasons. By any reasonable standard, that's a contributor to a reserve corps. I would say that it would be unreasonable NOT to expect McCollum to contribute to at least that degree this season.
why would a gm tank to keep their pick in a weak draft rather than strive to lose the pick this year, thus keeping their pick next year in what promised to be one of the best drafts in recent memory? that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
the population of San Antonio within the city, according to the 2010 census, was over 1.3 million people which ranked the city seventh in the U.S. at the time. i wouldn't call them a small market.
