Zeitgeist: Moving Forward

[Haakzilla]

...anyone else see it yet?! It was definitely a powerful & insightful documentary and I highly recommend it to anyone and everyone, regardless of your current world views.

 

[BLAZER PROPHET]

I don't even know what the hell it is. Sounds like a type of douche for women. "Ladies, want that fresh feel...."

 

[Haakzilla]

Here is the trailer...DOUCHE!

[video=youtube;QYLLFpNn4lM]

 

[barfo]

Sounds like a type of douche for women.

It sounds more to me like a type of douche for men.

barfo

 

[BLAZER PROPHET]

It sounds more to me like a type of douche for men.

barfo

Yes, but will it sell well at WalMart?

 

[Haakzilla]

...I love you you two make a mockery of one of the most influential films of our time, stay conditioned!

 

[barfo]

...I love you you two make a mockery of one of the most influential films of our time, stay conditioned!

I wasn't mocking the film, I was mocking BP.

Although, I sort of doubt that it is "one of the most influential films of our time".

barfo

 

[Haakzilla]

Although, I sort of doubt that it is "one of the most influential films of our time".

barfo

...maybe I should have said my time, I don't know how old you are! I don't know of many documentaries that are as thought-provoking as this one. Even the first two "Zeitgeist" movies hail in comparison to this one. Maybe there is still a premier screening in your area; http://www.zeitgeistmovingforward.com/zmap

 

[Colonel Ronan]

Is this a new Zeitgeist or something? I don't have Flash at work so no video for me.

The first Zeitgeist was decent but I didn't hear good things about the second.

 

[BLAZER PROPHET]

...I love you you two make a mockery of one of the most influential films of our time, stay conditioned!

A film. Made in Hollywood. Influential. Sure.

 

[Ed O]

I made it through the first 10 minutes of the first one after a friend (who happened to be smoking a LOT of pot on a regular basis) highly recommended it. I watched other bits and pieces of it since then, too.

It seemed like a huge waste of time. Maybe if I smoked pot it would be influential on me? I dunno.

Ed O.

 

[Haakzilla]

A film. Made in Hollywood. Influential. Sure.

...this documentary has absolutely NOTHING to do with Hollywood, but I appreciate your complete ignorance.

Zeitgeist: Moving Forward, by director Peter Joseph, is a feature length documentary work which will present a case for a needed transition out of the current socioeconomic monetary paradigm which governs the entire world society.

This subject matter will transcend the issues of cultural relativism and traditional ideology and move to relate the core, empirical "life ground" attributes of human and social survival, extrapolating those immutable natural laws into a new sustainable social paradigm called a "Resource-Based Economy".

THEATRICAL RELEASE - Zeitgeist: Moving Forward is planned to be released in 60+ countries and in 20+ languages starting January 15th 2011. This large scale release is not associated with any major distributor.

DVD/INTERNET RELEASE - This is a non-commercial project, which means it will be available for free acquisition via internet in both viewing form and full DVD download. ZeitgeistMovingForward.com will also have a physical $5.00 DVD available in mid to late January.

 

[Haakzilla]

I made it through the first 10 minutes of the first one after a friend (who happened to be smoking a LOT of pot on a regular basis) highly recommended it. I watched other bits and pieces of it since then, too.

It seemed like a huge waste of time. Maybe if I smoked pot it would be influential on me? I dunno.

Ed O.

Ed O, you would be perfect for a corporate media job...painting such broad irrational strokes and all. The most recent film will be influential for anyone and everyone that cares about humanity and making Earth a sustainable environment for all of mankind, not just those that smoke copious amounts of pot.

 

[Colonel Ronan]

Ed O, you would be perfect for a corporate media job...painting such broad irrational strokes and all. The most recent film will be influential for anyone and everyone that cares about humanity and making Earth a sustainable environment for all of mankind, not just those that smoke copious amounts of pot.

I like how you reply to the negative comments but ignore the post that is actually interested in the topic. Props, bro.

 

[Haakzilla]

Zeitgeist [1st documentary]:
[video=youtube;guXirzknYYE]

 

[Haakzilla]

Zeitgeist Addendum [2nd documentary]:
[video=youtube;1gKX9TWRyfs]

 

[Haakzilla]

I like how you reply to the negative comments but ignore the post that is actually interested in the topic. Props, bro.

Hey man, I was getting to you...patience my friend! I did somewhat answer your question in one of those posts though...yes it is the most recent Zeitgeist [3rd documentary]...here is a brief synopsis again, in case you missed it:

Zeitgeist: Moving Forward, by director Peter Joseph, is a feature length documentary work which will present a case for a needed transition out of the current socioeconomic monetary paradigm which governs the entire world society.

This subject matter will transcend the issues of cultural relativism and traditional ideology and move to relate the core, empirical "life ground" attributes of human and social survival, extrapolating those immutable natural laws into a new sustainable social paradigm called a "Resource-Based Economy".

 

[Colonel Ronan]

Cheers!

 

[Colonel Ronan]

Oh and Ed O... STFU.

 

[Ed O]

Oh and Ed O... STFU.

It's a movie full of nonsense that it beloved by conspiracy theorists and potheads.

I'm not going to shut up.

Ed O.

 

[Colonel Ronan]

It's a movie full of nonsense that it beloved by conspiracy theorists and potheads.

I'm not going to shut up.

Ed O.

I never said I didn't agree.

 

[Ed O]

I never said I didn't agree.

*hugs*

Ed O.

 

[maxiep]

...this documentary has absolutely NOTHING to do with Hollywood, but I appreciate your complete ignorance.

That lovely ideal runs headlong into human behavior, which has shown itself to be rather intransigent in the face of all the brilliant social engineering attempts over the millennia.

 

[Colonel Ronan]

*hugs*

Ed O.

*hugs*

Ronan.

 

[Haakzilla]

It's a movie full of nonsense that it beloved by conspiracy theorists and potheads.

I'm not going to shut up.

Ed O.

...I am not calling anything gospel here. You claim it is a "movie full of nonsense", yet you have only seen maybe 15 sporadic minutes out of nearly 7 total hours of footage. That's worse than your least favorite sports writer watching random clips from a years worth of Blazer games and writing an op-ed piece on the ins and outs of the team.

 

[maxiep]

...I am not calling anything gospel here. You claim it is a "movie full of nonsense", yet you have only seen maybe 15 sporadic minutes out of nearly 7 total hours of footage. That's worse than your least favorite sports writer watching random clips from a years worth of Blazer games and writing an op-ed piece on the ins and outs of the team.

The difference is the Blazers are worth watching.

 

[Haakzilla]

The difference is the Blazers are worth watching.

...funny guy, but you FAIL to get my point.

 

[maxiep]

...funny guy, but you get my point.

I don't, actually. I didn't have to wait until the end of "Showgirls" to come to the conclusion that it sucked and was a waste of my time. It was apparent within the first few minutes.

 

[Haakzilla]

I don't, actually. I didn't have to wait until the end of "Showgirls" to come to the conclusion that it sucked and was a waste of my time. It was apparent within the first few minutes.

...Showgirls is not a documentary. Showgirls does not have multiple parts that make up the whole movie and the information contained in it. Imagine only reading part one of a text book, for instance, and somehow concluding that the rest of the information contained in that text book is nonsense and waste of your time...even though you have no idea what the rest of the text book entails. Or any other non-fiction text for that matter. Same applies for multi-part documentaries.

 

[maxiep]

...Showgirls is not a documentary. Showgirls does not have multiple parts that make up the whole movie and the information contained in it. Imagine only reading part one of a text book, for instance, and somehow concluding that the rest of the information contained in that text book is nonsense and waste of your time...even though you have no idea what the rest of the text book entails. Or any other non-fiction text for that matter. Same applies for multi-part documentaries.

I don't need to spend my time looking for a needle in a haystack.