Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
-Swishscout.com on Kendall MarshallAthleticism:He’s not very fast or super explosive with the ball in his hands, but he’s quick. He doesn’t zoom around the court but has nice area quickness and burst to beat his man. Marshall accelerates from the triple threat pretty quickly and has a nice first step. Has decent speed to push the pace and tempo up the floor in transition, but not the speed to be a one man fast break. His straight-line speed allows him to get into the lane and finish at a good rate. Doesn’t change direction very quickly and lacks the shiftiness that a lot of elite NBA point guards have. Has decent spring for a point guard though and can get up, but he’s a very grounded player with a low center of gravity. What he lacks in speed and quickness he makes up for in being decisive and efficient with movement.
-NBAdraft.net on RubioHas good speed but lacks the great explosiveness that top tier point guards in the league possses … He is forced to shoot high amount of attempts in the paint because his marginal leaping ability makes it difficult for him to finish around the basket …
-Draftexpress on RubioAverage athleticism
- Average explosiveness
- Plays below the rim
Is anyone else bothered by Sullinger's (only) 9 boards/game? Milsap, Randolph and Love were all much better rebounders. You would think at his size he should be pulling down >10. Aldridge had more rebounds in his last year than Sullinger. He seems more like a Sean May pick.
-SwishScout.com (second best Draft site on the net!)Defense: Given that he doesn't shift his momentum very fast, move very well laterally, or have great length, you wouldn't think he would be a great perimeter defender. Conversely, he utilizes his smarts by showing assertiveness on defense with applying pressure, focus, good positioning and effort. Despite all this, he will struggle against the quicker, more elite athletes but will know which way to force them so that help can divert their athleticism and contest shots. He's a limited on ball defender, but is okay overall with his feel for the game. Makes great reads in passing lanes with anticipation and quick hands, also preying on entry passes to pick up steals. Tendency to drop under screens on the pick and roll but does a good job of defending it and fighting over when he has to. Very good at swiping at the ball when the opposition drives the lane and can create turnovers by knocking it away on help defense. Could be an excellent post doubler with his active hands in situations with poor shooting opposition, but otherwise get exposed for slow recovery to his man from the post for an open shot.
[video=youtube;Hx4F_hnQIzI]
-SwishScout.com (second best Draft site on the net!)
He should take a page out of Eric Snow's book of defense: Learn to take away angles before the opponent can make his move. With his feel for the game I think he could be able to do this.
My Answer? Rivers...
Yours?
Sullinger pulled down 12 rpg per 40 (pace adjusted) and 13.4 is frosh year.
For comparison, Love was at 14.8 his 1 year at UCLA, LaMarcus was 11rpg his last year at Texas.
It's looking like we will have to take Marshall with the NJ pick if we really want him. I don't think he'll last past Utah at 8 (if we do, in fact, end up with the 7th pick)
It's annoying that we can't settle the free agency issue before the draft. I see us targeting a PG in free agency but we won't know if we'll get one before the draft. I would actually be surprised if we did take Marshall, just because I doubt the front office that invested a pick in Nolan will give up on him so soon. (They should, but will they?)
You don't pass on a better player because you drafted a guy at the same spot the year before.
Case in point: Sebastian Telfair/Chris Paul
Or Clyde Drexler/Michael Jordan....????
EDIT: No matter how long it's been, that one still hurts doesn't it? :-(
I'll say it before and I'll say it again son....... Jim Paxson was an all-star SG, with Clyde as his backup.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. You should always draft the best player available.
I used to be a draft for need type o guy........ but NO MORE! The CP3/DWILL draft soured me big time. I'm with you MM, acquire the most talent and let the coach deal with the egos.
I used to be a draft for need type o guy........ but NO MORE! The CP3/DWILL draft soured me big time. I'm with you MM, acquire the most talent and let the coach deal with the egos.
Serge is damn good, but Batum's ceiling is higher IMO
Perhaps, but Ibaka is a big man, leading the league in blocks in 27 mpg (and its not even close), and hes younger.
rosetank, nice!
Serge is damn good, but Batum's ceiling is higher IMO
Btw, I hope we don't send out too many smoke screens this year -- it's backfired bigtime back in 2008:
The Blazer used Serge Ibaka as a smokescreen so they can draft Nicolas Batum.
True story.
Where is this coming from? I don't remember it.
I do remember in 09 when we moved up to 22, everyone thought it was to draft Casspi, and we got Claver instead.