PCmor7
Generational Poster
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2014
- Messages
- 8,030
- Likes
- 11,925
- Points
- 113
I don't know how the Blazers even evaluate what they have playing this style of basketball. I honestly can't tell who might be here who are starters on legitimate contenders, rotation guys, trade throw-ins or JAGs.
Sharpe looks like he's regressed. I'm watching him get faked off his feet and beaten off the dribble by Rui Hachimuri like he's a rookie. He looked better as a rookie. I think if the ball didn't stick in one place so much, he'd be so much better because he'd have opportunities to drive against shifting defense and rhythm shots. What we're playing hasn't allowed him to develop. I thought he was a quality piece. I'm not sure anymore.
Camara plays good enough defense but he doesn't make open 3s consistently enough that I can say he'd be rotation guy on a good team. He's not a 3-and-D guy right now. He's just a D guy, and he fouls too much.
Scoot with 0 assists. Is that a reflection of him not being the creator he was projected to be? A reflection of a poorly-defined offensive scheme? Some combination of both?
The only guy I feel good about saying could be part of a good Blazers team is Clingan, and that's because offense is such a small part in what he offers to the overall package. He plays defense and he rebounds and he screens and does that at a level that I could see contributing to a team that could win in the playoffs.
But these other guys? I don't know, and it's not just because of their play, it's because of how we play.
Sharpe looks like he's regressed. I'm watching him get faked off his feet and beaten off the dribble by Rui Hachimuri like he's a rookie. He looked better as a rookie. I think if the ball didn't stick in one place so much, he'd be so much better because he'd have opportunities to drive against shifting defense and rhythm shots. What we're playing hasn't allowed him to develop. I thought he was a quality piece. I'm not sure anymore.
Camara plays good enough defense but he doesn't make open 3s consistently enough that I can say he'd be rotation guy on a good team. He's not a 3-and-D guy right now. He's just a D guy, and he fouls too much.
Scoot with 0 assists. Is that a reflection of him not being the creator he was projected to be? A reflection of a poorly-defined offensive scheme? Some combination of both?
The only guy I feel good about saying could be part of a good Blazers team is Clingan, and that's because offense is such a small part in what he offers to the overall package. He plays defense and he rebounds and he screens and does that at a level that I could see contributing to a team that could win in the playoffs.
But these other guys? I don't know, and it's not just because of their play, it's because of how we play.
