kjironman1
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2014
- Messages
- 23,086
- Likes
- 23,646
- Points
- 113
This is awesome!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Specific? Or everything?This is awesome!
It always amuses me that American publications always do the medal ranking by total number of medals, so the US is ALWAYS first, whereas the rest of the world always does it by number of Golds. Here's the BBC:
View attachment 65418
It always amuses me that American publications always do the medal ranking by total number of medals, so the US is ALWAYS first, whereas the rest of the world always does it by number of Golds. Here's the BBC:
View attachment 65418
Just commenting on Bob the cap catcher getting his moment.Specific? Or everything?
I always felt it should be a point system--3 for gold, 2 for silver, 1 for bronze--and then ranked by total points. Basically in line with the total medal count ranking, but actually giving weight to victory. Maybe a 5-3-1 (or even 5-2-1) point assignment would be better?It always amuses me that American publications always do the medal ranking by total number of medals, so the US is ALWAYS first, whereas the rest of the world always does it by number of Golds. Here's the BBC:
View attachment 65418
My view is the Olympics are more individual than that but I could see that as a way to do a medal count if you felt it was necessary.I always felt it should be a point system--3 for gold, 2 for silver, 1 for bronze--and then ranked by total points. Basically in line with the total medal count ranking, but actually giving weight to victory. Maybe a 5-3-1 (or even 5-2-1) point assignment would be better?
I would like to see medals compared to population size. Expect a country of 300 million to win more than a country of 4 million, what about pet capital?
He is perhaps the most famous British Olympian:British diver knitting while he watches from the stands.
Yes!
Yes, but the OP was talking about pet CAPITAL. Do we have the RICHEST pets? (Probably.)I think the US has more pets by far, so we'd always be at the top.
barfo
I would like to see medals compared to population size. Expect a country of 300 million to win more than a country of 4 million, what about pet capital?
Turkey would win the Gold medal in ribbon chasingI bet cats would be awesome in floor exercise and balance beam. Well, unless they took time out to groom themselves and hack up a hairball.
Or, are we talking about the overall value of the pets. Some countries probably have some super expensive horses.Yes, but the OP was talking about pet CAPITAL. Do we have the RICHEST pets? (Probably.)
And Saudi Arabian cats are wealthy because of the oil moneyOr, are we talking about the overall value of the pets. Some countries probably have some super expensive horses.
There must be something in the cheeseHow the hell if France doing so well this time around... they were 10th in medal count in Tokyo.....
Favoritism?????
You must be new to this Olympics thing. The home country ALWAYS does WAY better than usual.How the hell if France doing so well this time around... they were 10th in medal count in Tokyo.....
Favoritism?????
All this talk about cats and pets in the olympics is really the ultimate dog days of summer!Yes, but the OP was talking about pet CAPITAL. Do we have the RICHEST pets? (Probably.)