Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is it just me?The Blazers, for whatever reason, don't play well against teams lacking players. It's incredibly maddening.
If we get the 8 spot in the play-in, we are likely to make the playoffs. Gotta be healthy when you get there. We have a nice cushion over Dallas and Memphis to at least get the 10 spot. We are only 3 games behind the 8th place Warriors and we have the tiebreaker. We’ve tanked enough. Get over it.If they were trying to make the playoffs would all those guys be OUT tonight? No. So tank and do it the right way. We still have people thinking they are trying to make the postseason.
Teams are always lacking players. Sometimes we win, sometimes we don’t.The Blazers, for whatever reason, don't play well against teams lacking players. It's incredibly maddening.
Detroit got there by developing their star PG and C and putting Grant/Jrue type vets around him. We’re doing just fine. If Giannis becomes an option, then of course you go get him. But Detroit this year could be us next year. Patience. Scoot is younger than Cade.I hope the new gm coach and owner are willing to wheel and deal. Make some decisions on some of our younger players that have peaked and package to make a difference. Detroit used to be a joke look where they are now. We need a gm that can blend the right talents that mesh. And oh defense wins championships
I forget how young he is. He is on his way to becoming an All Star in a few years.Clingan is going to be a monster in a few years
Incredible pick up.I love Vit. Never makes mistakes. Always makes the right play.
Spittin' straight facts!If we get the 8 spot in the play-in, we are likely to make the playoffs. Gotta be healthy when you get there. We have a nice cushion over Dallas and Memphis to at least get the 10 spot. We are only 3 games behind the 8th place Warriors and we have the tiebreaker. We’ve tanked enough. Get over it.
No, you're maddening for a whole different reason.Is it just me?
The guy guarded their best player all night. Played 34 mins and got a huge block in the 4th. Grabbed 7 rebounds and only committed 2 fouls. Without him they lose that game.I’m so tired just watching Toumani
I love Vit. Never makes mistakes. Always makes the right play.
That's why I never partake in the game thread while the game is on. It's so "What have you done for me in the last 30 seconds?"Game threads are a blast to read after the game is done. Bunch of ninny's clutching pearls and complaining about things that happen in every game being played in the NBA every single night.
All the crap Clingan just took while he was amassing a 20 and 19 night.
Jerami Grant puts 29 points out with 6-10 shooting from 3 and wow 5 rebounds and not a word.
Six players in double figures and our team didn't show until the last quarter?
Obviously when you play a team that has more players on the injured list a second or third string is going to have to score points for them but the Blazers are the one's that always let a "Scrub" score a season high. Dude got hot from 3. In this league you are okay with a bunch of threes being shot by a guy that doesn't usually make 7-8 from there.
The Blazers just beat a team twice in a row. Even the worst team in the league that is tough to do.
partake?That's why I never partake in the game thread while the game is on. It's so "What have you done for me in the last 30 seconds?"
I used to a lot more but I found myself not watching the game well enough and reading comments that were obviously knee jerk reactions and then I also found that my comments were just as reactionary.That's why I never partake in the game thread while the game is on. It's so "What have you done for me in the last 30 seconds?"
Man… I wish I would’ve read that response to “Partake” before I forsook and resolved on my comment that the dismay I feel was just as bad as the others that partake in the game thread!partake?
ok then, I challenge you to use 'partake', 'thus', and 'forsooth' in a single sentence talking about the Blazers. Bonus points for tossing in a 'resolve' and a 'dismay'
I think the blocks are down because he’s going for rebounds instead. Hard to do both?it's kind of crazy that I've become one of Clingan's biggest supporters here. I didn't want Portland to draft him because of the issues with drop-coverage C's. Blazers also had Ayton although I was always praying they were going to dump Ayton asap. Anyway, if the Blazers were going to draft a C I was hoping for Ware. He wouldn't have been a bad choice, but I now like Clingan more
I think a pretty good case can be made that Clingan is the 2nd most impactful player on the team. If you track the top-9 players in the rotation (I'm excluding Timelord because of too limited amount of minutes), start with net rating (off-def):
Clingan +19
Camara +6
Deni +3
Jrue 0.0
Grant 0.0
Murray -3
Cissoko -8
Sharpe -9
Love -14
Clingan is 2nd in PER; 3rd in TS%; 3rd in FTr; 1st in every rebounding metric; 1st in blk rate; 1st in winshares; 1st in winshares/48; 3rd in BPM; 2nd in VORP
speaking of rebounding, how does Clingan rate in the entire NBA?
3rd in total rebounds
2nd in rebounds/game
1st in offensive rebounds/game
1st in total rebound %
1st in offensive rebound %
8th in defensive rebound%
he's a monster in the paint, which is what Portland needs. I don't believe the defensive scheme is maximizing Clingan's strengths or minimizing his weaknesses. He's spending too much time chasing gaps in Portland's perimeter defense, and he's not good at that, and that's what some people are focusing on. I believe that chasing is the main reason his blocks/100-possessions have dropped from 4.0-->2.3; and his block rate has dropped from 7.5% to 4.4%
In the early-90’s, The Sunday Oregonian posted team stats. Portland was nearly always the leader in RPG and rebounding percentage. That was a strength of those teams and why Portland was so successful. They were tough. I enjoyed watching those teams. The game and the rules have changed. Clingan reminds me a bit of those times. And Pryz. DC can be a bit clunky at times, but I enjoyed watching him develop as a player.it's kind of crazy that I've become one of Clingan's biggest supporters here. I didn't want Portland to draft him because of the issues with drop-coverage C's. Blazers also had Ayton although I was always praying they were going to dump Ayton asap. Anyway, if the Blazers were going to draft a C I was hoping for Ware. He wouldn't have been a bad choice, but I now like Clingan more
I think a pretty good case can be made that Clingan is the 2nd most impactful player on the team. If you track the top-9 players in the rotation (I'm excluding Timelord because of too limited amount of minutes), start with net rating (off-def):
Clingan +19
Camara +6
Deni +3
Jrue 0.0
Grant 0.0
Murray -3
Cissoko -8
Sharpe -9
Love -14
Clingan is 2nd in PER; 3rd in TS%; 3rd in FTr; 1st in every rebounding metric; 1st in blk rate; 1st in winshares; 1st in winshares/48; 3rd in BPM; 2nd in VORP
speaking of rebounding, how does Clingan rate in the entire NBA?
3rd in total rebounds
2nd in rebounds/game
1st in offensive rebounds/game
1st in total rebound %
1st in offensive rebound %
8th in defensive rebound%
he's a monster in the paint, which is what Portland needs. I don't believe the defensive scheme is maximizing Clingan's strengths or minimizing his weaknesses. He's spending too much time chasing gaps in Portland's perimeter defense, and he's not good at that, and that's what some people are focusing on. I believe that chasing is the main reason his blocks/100-possessions have dropped from 4.0-->2.3; and his block rate has dropped from 7.5% to 4.4%
In the early-90’s, The Sunday Oregonian posted team stats. Portland was nearly always the leader in RPG and rebounding percentage. That was a strength of those teams and why Portland was so successful. They were tough. I enjoyed watching those teams. The game and the rules have changed. Clingan reminds me a bit of those times. And Pryz. DC can be a bit clunky at times, but I enjoyed watching him develop as a player.
his defensive reb/100-possessions has increased by 2.6%. His blocks have dropped 43%....so no, there's no correlation between the twoI think the blocks are down because he’s going for rebounds instead. Hard to do both?
No Correlation but some causation. He's boxing out better and that tends to be a step before the block motion.his defensive reb/100-possessions has increased by 2.6%. His blocks have dropped 43%....so no, there's no correlation between the two
In the early-90’s, The Sunday Oregonian posted team stats. Portland was nearly always the leader in RPG and rebounding percentage. That was a strength of those teams and why Portland was so successful. They were tough. I enjoyed watching those teams. The game and the rules have changed. Clingan reminds me a bit of those times. And Pryz. DC can be a bit clunky at times, but I enjoyed watching him develop as a player.
