Rastapopoulos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 42,646
- Likes
- 27,017
- Points
- 113
Dame continues to be awesome:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I want this dude leading the charge!The next time we see a trade Dame scenario we need to be at that poster's house with TORCHES & PITCHFORKS!!
![]()
Where's MarAzul with his assist to miss stat...?![]()
Why? Can't trade really nice guys? Does that mean Meyers retires a Trailblazer? He's a super nice guyThe next time we see a trade Dame scenario we need to be at that poster's house with TORCHES & PITCHFORKS!!
![]()
Why? Can't trade really nice guys? Does that mean Meyers retires a Trailblazer? He's a super nice guy
You know this is a dumb question so why ask it? Stirring the pot?
Why? Can't trade really nice guys? Does that mean Meyers retires a Trailblazer? He's a super nice guy
Silly question for an equally silly statement.You know this is a silly question so why ask it? Stirring the pot?
My point is that suggesting trading Dame should not be met with ridicule because he's a nice guy, as suggested in a previous post.Steve Blake was a nice guy (unless you tried to start something with him) and we traded him 3 times. Mason Plumlee was a nice guy and we traded him.
I'm sorry, what was your point?
BNM
My point is that suggesting trading Dame should not be met with ridicule because he's a nice guy, as suggested in a previous post.
My point is that suggesting trading Dame should not be met with ridicule because he's a nice guy, as suggested in a previous post.
I agree with all of this. Not sure what your point is?All career journeymen. Rarely do you find loyal, upper-echelon player that wants to be a part of a single franchise this day in age... Is he top-10 in this league? No. But he's clearly top-25, and I'd argue he's top-15.
Trading Dame to trade Dame should be met with ridicule. Trading Dame because you think it may better our team, should not. Him being a great guy means nothing. Again, I think we all agree.No, but it should be met with ridicule because he's a nice guy, a great leader and a great player who is committed to being here and locked up for 4 more years. The latter are all well known and qualify as common knowledge to anyone who follows the team.
BNM
I agree with all of this. Not sure what your point is?
Dame isn't close to the best player to wear a Blazer uni in his prime.You're throwing out names of "nice guys". There's a difference between guys like Dame and Nards/Plums/etc. Your posts would make you seem like you didn't understand the difference. And if you do understand the difference, what's wrong with complimenting arguably the best player to wear a Blazers uni (at least during his prime)?
Dame isn't close to the best player to wear a Blazer uni in his prime.
As for Dame vs the journeymen, I know the difference. I was simply responding to a post that said "next time we see a trade Dame scenario, we need to be at that posters house with torches and pitchforks."
This statement was the first response to Dame being a nice guy.
My point was, who gives a fuck if he is a nice guy when it comes to making your team better. Then the soccer moms showed up.
What do you disagree with?Stephen A Smith.... Mediocre Man.
IT ALL MAKES SENSE :MARIS61:
What do you disagree with?
None of it, it was just too perfect not to say.
PUT THE CUPCAKE DOWN!
Looks like Felton is trying the look over there move so he can engulf that baked good
Clyde overrarted by everyone because he's on every to 50 player in NBA history list. Dame is not close to him yet. Walton was, as you say for a year, better than Dame has been because scoreboard.MM, who was a better Blazer in their prime? Dame ain't close, apparently.
So tell us. There weren't many better players, regardless of prime. So tell me how Dame wasn't close.
Sabas? Damn, he'd have been amazing in his prime. But we got slipped leftovers.
Clyde? Meh, he was amazing but overrated.
Pippen? Yeah, a great player that was a great facilitator in his twilight with Portland.
Walton? Yeah, I guess. For a year. Injuries killed what could have been.
Trading Dame to trade Dame should be met with ridicule. Trading Dame because you think it may better our team, should not. Him being a great guy means nothing. Again, I think we all agree.
MM, who was a better Blazer in their prime? Dame ain't close, apparently.
So tell us. There weren't many better players, regardless of prime. So tell me how Dame wasn't close.
Sabas? Damn, he'd have been amazing in his prime. But we got slipped leftovers.
Clyde? Meh, he was amazing but overrated.
Pippen? Yeah, a great player that was a great facilitator in his twilight with Portland.
Walton? Yeah, I guess. For a year. Injuries killed what could have been.
