Around the NBA: February 2019 edition!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

But as it stands I would rather have a healthy CJ so we have a blessing here to be thankful for.
Were discussing trade packages at the time the deal was made. KP saw Oladipos talent, and hebhas/had more than CJ. Sabonis was also a year off of being the 11th pick, so he was more valueable than the 26th pick.
 
Were discussing trade packages at the time the deal was made. KP saw Oladipos talent, and hebhas/had more than CJ. Sabonis was also a year off of being the 11th pick, so he was more valueable than the 26th pick.
CJ had more value than Oladipo that summer as he was coming off his best shooting season of his career (48, 42, 91). Oladipo signed a similar extension and was coming off a mediocre season in OKC and hadn't done much as the man in Orlando either. It is absolute hindsight to say Oladipo had more or even the same trade value. CJ was untouchable at the time so we'll never know if Indy would've taken that offer.

Sabonis didn't look good in his rookie year either. The 2017 draft was loaded so I think that's a pretty good offer. Besides the Jazz got Mitchell for the 24th pick and Trey Lyles so it's possible we could've still gotten high enough for him even if we gave Indy CJ and the 15th pick.
 
CJ had more value than Oladipo that summer as he was coming off his best shooting season of his career (48, 42, 91). Oladipo signed a similar extension and was coming off a mediocre season in OKC and hadn't done much as the man in Orlando either. It is absolute hindsight to say Oladipo had more or even the same trade value. CJ was untouchable at the time so we'll never know if Indy would've taken that offer.

Sabonis didn't look good in his rookie year either. The 2017 draft was loaded so I think that's a pretty good offer. Besides the Jazz got Mitchell for the 24th pick and Trey Lyles so it's possible we could've still gotten high enough for him even if we gave Indy CJ and the 15th pick.
Wasn't Mitchell the 12th pick? Or are you saying they traded Lyles and the 24th pick for Mitchell? (just making sure I'm reading it right).
 
Were discussing trade packages at the time the deal was made. KP saw Oladipos talent, and hebhas/had more than CJ. Sabonis was also a year off of being the 11th pick, so he was more valueable than the 26th pick.
I agree. And i know exactly what you were discussing. My point is that Olapido is dealing with a serious knee injury right now. CJ is healthy. Also the 26th pick is always a question mark. However we got Jake in the second round 47th if i am correct. I would say at this point Jake is having more impact than Sabonis.
 
I agree. And i know exactly what you were discussing. My point is that Olapido is dealing with a serious knee injury right now. CJ is healthy. Also the 26th pick is always a question mark. However we got Jake in the second round 47th if i am correct. I would say at this point Jake is having more impact than Sabonis.
So are you discussing anything in regards to the point I was making?

Do you think our offer was better?
offso, Jake is in no way, shape, or form more impactful than Sabonis. Nothing points to that at all. Sabonis is closer to CJ than he is to Jake.
 
Jake is in no way, shape, or form more impactful than Sabonis.
So let's compare starters with end of the bench guys?...given Sabonis role with Indiana I think Jake would have had at least as much impact..Sabonis never thrilled me with his game but he is improving. Sabonis has much more court time to be impactful
 
So let's compare starters with end of the bench guys?...given Sabonis role with Indiana I think Jake would have had at least as much impact..Sabonis never thrilled me with his game but he is improving. Sabonis has much more court time to be impactful
What are you arguing? He said Jake has more impact than Sabonis. I disagree. If you think Sabonis is a starter (he's not) and Jake is an end of the bench guy (he's not) then why are you arguing for a statement saying Jake has more impact? It makes absolutely 0 sense.

Sabonis is better at pretty much everything on a per minute basis.

Sabonis has the advantage in:
Scoring rate (Pts Per 36)
Rebound %
Assist %
Defense (DBPM, Def RPM)
Offense (OBPM)
Efficiency (TS%)
Overall Advanced Stats (PER, WS/48, etc)

All of those stats account for minute differential, which isnt much (6.2) and is a very weak and flawed reason to claim that Layman is more impactful.
 
And he is hurt with knee problems. I'll take CJ. Thanks.
And was healthy and a better player before his injury, which KP foresaw, and made the right trade for. Bad luck doesnt make it the wrong decision at all. Even if you think it was wrong, that doesnt matter.

We couldnt have had both PG and Mitchell. But if you want to believe that, go ahead.
 
And was healthy and a better player before his injury, which KP foresaw, and made the right trade for. Bad luck doesnt make it the wrong decision at all. Even if you think it was wrong, that doesnt matter.

We couldnt have had both PG and Mitchell. But if you want to believe that, go ahead.

We couldn't have drafted Mitchell? And then traded for George? Explain that one BJ
 
Oladipo was compared to Michael Jordan coming out of college. I believe we tried to move up in draft to get him.
 
Hm, which would you rather have, C.J. and the 26th pick, or a healthy Oladipo and Sabonis? I'd take the latter, as Pritchard would've done at the time.
Obviously the latter looking back now but hindsight is 20/20. I think it could be argued that at the time of that trade CJ/1st rounder had more value than Oladipo/Sabonis. I seem to remember a lot of people were surprised at how little value they got for PG. Vic blew up after the trade though and now most would say he’s more valuable than CJ. I think most teams knew Indian was in a bind and only offering complimentary peices, not “stars”, for PG.
 
Last edited:
Spurs lost to NY???

They've lost 6 of their last 7 games and are holding on for dear life to the 8th seed. Can they please get their shit together?

I want them to get in ahead of the Lakers.
 
Spurs lost to NY???

They've lost 6 of their last 7 games and are holding on for dear life to the 8th seed. Can they please get their shit together?

I want them to get in ahead of the Lakers.
I wouldn't mind both the Lakers and Spurs missing the playoffs in lieu of the Clippers and Kings.
 
And was healthy and a better player before his injury, which KP foresaw, and made the right trade for. Bad luck doesnt make it the wrong decision at all. Even if you think it was wrong, that doesnt matter.

We couldnt have had both PG and Mitchell. But if you want to believe that, go ahead.
I never believed that. Or said that i did.
My statement was a simple statement of fact that he is hurt. Right now we have CJ. CJ is not nursing a knee injury. Olapido is nursing a knee injury. Nothing more nothing less.
 
Spurs lost to NY???

They've lost 6 of their last 7 games and are holding on for dear life to the 8th seed. Can they please get their shit together?

I want them to get in ahead of the Lakers.
They were playing really well just last month. Weird?
 
And was healthy and a better player before his injury, which KP foresaw, and made the right trade for. Bad luck doesnt make it the wrong decision at all. Even if you think it was wrong, that doesnt matter.

We couldnt have had both PG and Mitchell. But if you want to believe that, go ahead.
I kind of think if CJ was given reins of a team like Olidipo was in Indy he could be fairly equivalent to VO. Probably better on offense, and worse on defense, but VO struggled in OKC, and was underwhelming in Orlando. We haven't seen CJ ever try to be a number one somewhere if he did I think he would excel at it. The difference to me isn't so much in those two players as much as I think Sabonis was a better 2nd asset/piece than what the Blazers were going to give up hypothetically.
 
I kind of think if CJ was given reins of a team like Olidipo was in Indy he could be fairly equivalent to VO. Probably better on offense, and worse on defense, but VO struggled in OKC, and was underwhelming in Orlando. We haven't seen CJ ever try to be a number one somewhere if he did I think he would excel at it. The difference to me isn't so much in those two players as much as I think Sabonis was a better 2nd asset/piece than what the Blazers were going to give up hypothetically.
Sabonis in his rookie year:

Played 81 of 82 games and started 66 of those.

Averaged 20.1 minutes per game while only averaging 5.9 points and 3.6 rebounds.

His Per-36 numbers weren't good so it's not like he was just not getting minutes.

His FG% was 39.9% which is downright terrible for a big man.

He was so bad he was basically benched in the playoffs.

Now you could look at it as an Olshey special on a lottery pick that still has potential but I don't think anyone saw Sabonis play in OKC that year and thought he was an asset that couldn't be matched. Much like Bones is doing with Oladipo you are doing the same thing with Sabonis.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top