Exclusive Around the NBA: February, 2026! (11 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Utah is not making a run -- they want a lotto pick to add to what they are building and they should and if they do not then Ainge is stupid and one thing he is not is stupid.
JJJ and Lauri is a damn good forward Duo.

They have a lot of pressure to win now as the fanbase is super sick of the tanking. Sort of like the Blazers. Mgmt might now be on board with trying to win since they gave up 3 picks for JJJ.

Wouldn't shock me if they just play to win and if they get a few wins try to make a run at us for the playin. But if they don't win soon they might pull the plug on the season. I think we'll find out soon with how they do in the next two weeks.
 
They have a Top 8 protected pick if they get 9 or worse that pick goes to OKC so it's in there best interest to tank right now -- Period

enuff said --
Ahh great point - your right I overlooked that. Yes this is the final season and then will become 2nd rounders owed.

I bet your right - Utah keeps up the tank then.

So really Kings, Pelicans, Jazz, Mavs, Grizzlies are all likely out for the playin?

Clippers probably will lose trying to integrate Garland as well as his injury risk.

Yeah this makes the playin MUCH easier for the Blazers this season. Maybe even 9th spot or even jumping GS to 8.
 
Its funny how pick protections can kind of become a self fulflilling prophecy where teams end up tanking for a half decade or longer.

Utah has sucked for 5 years to hold onto that pick
We've sucked for 5 years to hold onto the pick we owe Chicago

Kind of seems like it would be better to just have a higher cutoff for protection (like lets say top7 for our pick) and then its eliminate after that first season. It either goes to the other team or not.

I'm so sick of hearing how we need to lose to keep our pick, I bet Jazz fans think similar.

Chicago is also probably sick of thinking they might get a pick this draft - but then no every year they don't.
 
How ever it shakes out the foreign born team needs at least 9 ready to play as well as two US born teams that need 9 players each who are ready to play.
Its 8 per team - 24 players total (12 from each conference).

Kawhi was already added and Towns was put on the world roster.

But now they probably need another world player - unless they can add a US player and like Towns move someone over. Sengun would be an obvious pick to simply add to the world and might also be most deserving regardless of country.
 
Do they HAVE to be foreign players?
I think with the rosters set, they would replace SGA with a foreign player. They already moved Towns over to team world and they could move Norm over too, but I think its too late to swap the rosters (new rules so don't really know). Sengun seems logical replacement.
 
This whole "team world" quota requirement is bullshit. Let's put a bunch of replacements on team world while a dozen better players get left out because they weren't born outside the US. (Hypothetically)
 
This whole "team world" quota requirement is bullshit. Let's put a bunch of replacements on team world while a dozen better players get left out because they weren't born outside the US. (Hypothetically)
Nobody is left out. If needed they just add more than 24 Allstars to the game.

I do think it's stupid that you can't explain the format in a sentence. If they want this format they should have a 4th team from rookie/sophomore game and then it's a simple semi final / final game. That would make the prior day cooler as well as now the winner of those games plays the main Allstars, so it would link all the days better.

This 3 team game is too confusing.
 
Is this quota system devised to ensure there are "enough" foreign players on the all star team, or that there aren't too many? Either way, it's bullshit. If a guy plays in the NBA, and deserves to be on an all star team, where they were born shouldn't decide whether they get in or cause a more deserving player to be left off. (Hypothetically)
 
Is this quota system devised to ensure there are "enough" foreign players on the all star team, or that there aren't too many? Either way, it's bullshit. If a guy plays in the NBA, and deserves to be on an all star team, where they were born shouldn't decide whether they get in or cause a more deserving player to be left off. (Hypothetically)
No, it's split up after the 24 Allstars are selected. They moved Towns from US to the World when they added Kawhi as an injury replacement.

If needed theyd just have a 25 or 26 all-star in the "game" so nobody is losing a spot because of their country.

Maybe it's a stupid format, but that's not because it's holding any deserving player out of the game.
 
Is this quota system devised to ensure there are "enough" foreign players on the all star team, or that there aren't too many? Either way, it's bullshit. If a guy plays in the NBA, and deserves to be on an all star team, where they were born shouldn't decide whether they get in or cause a more deserving player to be left off. (Hypothetically)
You have a point.
 
No, it's split up after the 24 Allstars are selected. They moved Towns from US to the World when they added Kawhi as an injury replacement.

If needed theyd just have a 25 or 26 all-star in the "game" so nobody is losing a spot because of their country.

Maybe it's a stupid format, but that's not because it's holding any deserving player out of the game.
OIC

:cheers:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top