Here are the head to head records for portland against western conference rivals last year:
Team Record (Wins-Losses)
Dallas Mavericks 1-3
Denver Nuggets 1-3
Golden State Warriors 1-3
Houston Rockets 1-3
LA Clippers 1-3
Los Angeles Lakers 2-2
Memphis Grizzlies 1-3
Minnesota Timberwolves 2-2
New Orleans Pelicans 2-2
Oklahoma City Thunder 1-3
Phoenix Suns 2-2
Sacramento Kings 1-3
San Antonio Spurs 1-3
Utah Jazz 1-3
--
Let's say LAL, Rockets, GSW, Dallas and the Mavericks got so much better, that gives Portland, at worst, 6 wins if they lose all the games that they won last year (and there is no way in hell that happens, imho, we have just seen that when Portland plays it's rotation players it can compete with GSW, so you can't tell me they will not be able to steal at least a game from these teams). On the other hand, Portland lost 3 games to Utah last year, 2 games to Phoenix, 2 games to NOP, 3 to the Grizzlies, 3 to the Clippers.
I am sorry, I just don't see how the western conference got so much stronger over the summer. It did not, in aggregate. It might have got more top-heavy, because you now have 3-4 teams that can challenge OKC where there was none last year, but Memphis is probably not as good, Phoenix is a big question mark, are the Kings any better? Utah really wants to tank and the Blazers are not going to lose as many games to it as they did last year. Is Minnesota really better?
Now, while GSW has proven to be very good when their big 3 were good, they fell apart when Steph went down and Jimmy played hurt. They are older now, how likely are they to stay healthy for 82 games? How likely is it that the Thunder will not relax some now that the won it all, not an unusual occurrence for new championship teams (*).
So, I am still not seeing how the West got tougher, honestly, maybe at the top, but overall? I do not see it.
(*)
LAL won .732 in their championship year vs .583 the year after
Bucks went from .639 to .622
GSW went from .646 to .537
Boston went from .780 to .744
The Nuggets were the only recent exception, going from .646 to .695
In other words, if the Blazers got better, they should, health permitting, have at least as good a record as the year before, or better.
The Blazers won only 19 games against western teams last year, finishing with a record of 19-33 - if you do not think they win 19 again at least this year, I don't know what to tell you. Even if they win, let's say 17 (which is a miserable .32 win%) and we all agree that they got better and supposedly the east got worst, surely they will win more than the 17-13 record against the east they had last year. In other words, there's a lot of nonsense about how the west got better (it didn't really overall, just moved around a bit) and the Blazers were so bad against the west last year, I can't see how they end up with less wins than they did last year, overall (health permitting)