Bayless needs to start

[bigbailes]

And every time they pulled away, we came right back at THEM.

did we ever have the lead in the 2nd half? was it ever a one possesion game?

 

[The_Lillard_King]

i'm all for starting bayless, and i'm one of the few sergio supporters in here. sergio seems to run better in the second unit and bayless in the first anyways. chalk it up to another dumb move by nate.

now i'll get blasted because we're 30-18 and how dare i question nate, funny that winning cures all.

Oh no . . . it's down to just me and *gulp* maris in support of starting Sergio.

I love you Maris, but know I'm going be lobbying for Bayless to play back up to Blake.

Bayless is our energy guy off the bench. Rudy, Bayless, Outlaw, Joel . . . all give crazy energy in their own unique way. None are consistent and the second half will be grueling on Bayless and Rudy. So you get a great combination of role players available off the bench.

When the team needs a spark, Nate's got options.

 

[bigbailes]

Oh no . . . it's down to just me and *gulp* maris in support of starting Sergio.

I love you Maris, but know I'm going be lobbying for Bayless to play back up to Blake.

Bayless is our energy guy off the bench. Rudy, Bayless, Outlaw, Joel . . . all give crazy energy in their own unique way. None are consistent and the second half will be grueling on Bayless and Rudy. So you get a great combination of role players available off the bench.

When the team needs a spark, Nate's got options.

pretty much but thank god none of us are running the blazers. so i guess it's not up to any of us, unless this is one of the forums KP is on.