Bayless trade: Yuck or Yay? (2 Viewers)

[zeded]

To be determined, imho.

Depends on how good Armon is going to be, how high the pick will be and if it is the last move of the pre-season.

I'm on board with that. We can't really tell yet, but my impression from pre-season was that rather than Armon, it is Wes who will take P-time from JB. If we waited to trade him later in the season when he was playing maybe 10 minutes every other game or every third game what was his trade value then? I understand the idea that he might have had more value in a combo trade, but it doesn't look like we had that option open to us. Working with imperfect info I'm comfortable with this and whether it's a good or bad deal won't be completely clear until the end of the season.

 

[Wheels]

I f-ing HATE this.

 

[Wheels]

To his credit, he never bitched his feelings to the media.

I wish he could have had more freedom to do his thing here. But Nate was hellbent on turning him into something that he isn't.

this.

 

[VanillaGorilla]

I think you guys are overrating Bayless. Homer goggles.

 

[Wheels]

I think you guys are overrating Bayless. Homer goggles.

tell me since you obviously know how and what I feel about Bayless. How am I overrating him?

 

[Darkwebs]

I think we got Pritch-slapped.

 

[Natebishop3]

I think we got Pritch-slapped.

I have a feeling that's how it's going to turn out.

 

[Wheels]

the ONLY way I see this maybe being ok... is with it being a few years down the road deal. Like Utah had with NY.

 

[VanillaGorilla]

tell me since you obviously know how and what I feel about Bayless. How am I overrating him?

He only showed one consistent skill, which was getting to the line. He didn't finish well, he didn't defend well, he didn't pass well and he certainly didn't shoot well. I also didn't see that much potential for improvement in those areas. It's just my opinion though. Probably every sports fan is guilty of being a homer at some point, I know I have. I don't mean it as an insult.

 

[Natebishop3]

He only showed one consistent skill, which was getting to the line. He didn't finish well, he didn't defend well, he didn't pass well and he certainly didn't shoot well. I also didn't see that much potential for improvement in those areas. It's just my opinion though. Probably every sports fan is guilty of being a homer at some point, I know I have. I don't mean it as an insult.

He was also one of the only guys who brought the effort during the playoffs. Is everyone forgetting about that?

 

[Wheels]

He only showed one consistent skill, which was getting to the line. He didn't finish well, he didn't defend well, he didn't pass well and he certainly didn't shoot well. I also didn't see that much potential for improvement in those areas. It's just my opinion though. Probably every sports fan is guilty of being a homer at some point, I know I have. I don't mean it as an insult.

I think the term homer is used very loosely here. I dont think that Bayless was anywhere near perfect... but on a relatively soft team.. he was one of the few who always brought it. I hope Matthews is ready to carry a bench scoring role because as constructed our bench lacks firepower IMO. I am not counting on Rudy to be insane all year.

 

[Wheels]

He was also one of the only guys who brought the effort during the playoffs. Is everyone forgetting about that?

my thoughts as well.

 

[VanillaGorilla]

I think the term homer is used very loosely here. I dont think that Bayless was anywhere near perfect... but on a relatively soft team.. he was one of the few who always brought it. I hope Matthews is ready to carry a bench scoring role because as constructed our bench lacks firepower IMO. I am not counting on Rudy to be insane all year.

I agree that he always brought intensity. I do think Matthews can take on that roll and be better.

 

[Wheels]

I agree that he always brought intensity. I do think Matthews can take on that roll and be better.

I sure hope that you are right, and that I am wrong on this one.. believe you me

 

[BoBoBREWSKI]

I like the deal. Bayless thought he was a better player than he was. We dont need him with Matthews and I like the potential of Armon. Giving them the PT Bayless may have demanded makes us better. You all know Bayless would cause problems if he wasnt getting the minutes he thinks he deserves.

 

[Natebishop3]

I agree that he always brought intensity. I do think Matthews can take on that roll and be better.

Maybe on defense, but we don't know for sure that Matthews is going to be a consistent scorer for this team.

 

[Natebishop3]

This reminds me of the Zach Randolph trade. In the end, that trade didn't get us shit, and I have a feeling that this trade will have a similar outcome.

 

[VanillaGorilla]

Maybe on defense, but we don't know for sure that Matthews is going to be a consistent scorer for this team.

I don't think Bayless was a consistent scorer at all.

 

[Natebishop3]

I don't think Bayless was a consistent scorer at all.

That's where his intensity was though.

 

[MickZagger]

This reminds me of the Zach Randolph trade. In the end, that trade didn't get us shit, and I have a feeling that this trade will have a similar outcome.

Yet, gives opportunity for players who help us win. Addition by subtraction.

 

[Natebishop3]

Yet, gives opportunity for players who help us win. Addition by subtraction.

I don't believe in addition by subtraction. I believe in addition by consolidation. I'm not saying we shouldn't have traded Bayless, I'm saying we should have packaged him with something else for a player we could actually use this season.

 

[Ed O]

Yet, gives opportunity for players who help us win. Addition by subtraction.

This doesn't make sense to me. I am not a believer in "addition by subtraction" generally, but in THIS case? I don't see it.

If Bayless was taking minutes away from anyone this year, it would have been from inferior (and older or at least not significantly younger) players.

How is playing guys that wouldn't have been good enough to earn minutes over Bayless going to be a good thing?

Ed O.

 

[Ed O]

The protection of this pick is much better than I had thought it was when I voted. I would change my vote from "Yuck" to "Meh".

Bayless is a potential future all-star, and if that happens we got ripped off. If he's an average starter or less, then it's one we can live with.

Ed O.

 

[Natebishop3]

This doesn't make sense to me. I am not a believer in "addition by subtraction" generally, but in THIS case? I don't see it.

If Bayless was taking minutes away from anyone this year, it would have been from inferior (and older or at least not significantly younger) players.

How is playing guys that wouldn't have been good enough to earn minutes over Bayless going to be a good thing?

Ed O.

Exactly.

 

[bbc23]

If the Hornets make the playoffs-even as the 8 seed-you can't expect the pick to be higher than 18 due to the top heavy nature of the East and the fact that last years #8 seed, OKC, had the 21st and could have been 22nd if it weren't for a tiebreaker.

 

[1 Eye Jack]

Man I don't get all the love for what would have been at best our 5th guard. He wasn't going to get any playing time with Roy, Miller, Rudy, and Mathews all ahead of him. Supposedly Armon also moved up so Bayless was 6th best guard on our team, damn we must be loaded to have a future all star so deep on our team. He was a great hustle player but we just picked up a better player in Mathews for that exact thing plus he's better shooter, defender and overall better player.

 

[Natebishop3]

Man I don't get all the love for what would have been at best our 5th guard. He wasn't going to get any playing time with Roy, Miller, Rudy, and Mathews all ahead of him. Supposedly Armon also moved up so Bayless was 6th best guard on our team, damn we must be loaded to have a future all star so deep on our team. He was a great hustle player but we just picked up a better player in Mathews for that exact thing plus he's better shooter, defender and overall better player.

Because Bayless is more capable of running the point than Rudy or Matthews. The question is whether Bayless is better than Johnson, but hey, we didn't get to see any of the preseason games so I can't comment one way or another.

 

[MickZagger]

Because Bayless is more capable of running the point than Rudy or Matthews. The question is whether Bayless is better than Johnson, but hey, we didn't get to see any of the preseason games so I can't comment one way or another.

I don't agree. I guess I'm supposed to though, because Bayless is shorter than both those players.

 

[Natebishop3]

I don't agree. I guess I'm supposed to though, because Bayless is shorter than both those players.

Which one do you think is a better point guard? Rudy has no handle and Matthews has never been considered a distributor. Bayless may not be a pure point guard, but he CAN pass the ball, and his handle is far superior to either of those players.

 

[1 Eye Jack]

Because Bayless is more capable of running the point than Rudy or Matthews. The question is whether Bayless is better than Johnson, but hey, we didn't get to see any of the preseason games so I can't comment one way or another.

I don't know about Bayless being a better back up PG than Mathews.....maybe regardless Bayless wasn't a good PG either. I have a feeling it's a mute point in that Cho has something up his sleeve for a new PG. Mathews and Rudy were going to need lots of minutes and Bayless was going to be lucky to see 8-10 minutes a game. Hell Roy can play 10 minutes a game as PG.