riverman
Writing Team
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 68,720
- Likes
- 68,106
- Points
- 113
smh....good grief dudeAnd you've proven my point. Thank you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
smh....good grief dudeAnd you've proven my point. Thank you!
Did she follow through? Did he get a conviction? What evidence supports this allegation? Awe yes, it was only from the woman that was married to Trump and made this public when she was going through a divorce. Wow you are batting .001But the actual accused rapist is ok.....
When Trump has to debate one on one with a candidate that is actually qualified and informed, it'll plummet like a meteorite
Silver has a hunch. All the other pundits that have made similar predictions have been wrong so far.
When Silver publishes a statistical analysis that shows Trump losing, it'll have some believability.
Yep, good grief... That's the funny thing about you. Your reading comprehension is seriously lacking. I explained that we cannot forgive Manson because his actions were 40+ years ago, but it's okay to forgive Bernie because it was 40+ years ago.smh....good grief dude
Did she follow through? Did he get a conviction? What evidence supports this allegation? Awe yes, it was only from the woman that was married to Trump and made this public when she was going through a divorce. Wow you are batting .001
Bernie has his fantasy published with his signature on it. That is evidence
FIFYLike it or not, he's been on stage with a dozen qualified and informed candidates. Afterwards, his standing in the polls has only gotten stronger.
I don't like him, but I don't deny reality television stars.
And you've proven my point. Thank you!
Polls....as I've said before, I haven't been polled, nor my wife or son or anyone I know..I don't believe in any poll that has not included the opinions of folks I live around in Oregon. He also has not debated one on one with anyone yet other than moderators and we know how that turned outLike it or not, he's been on stage with a dozen qualified and informed candidates. Afterwards, his standing in the polls has only gotten stronger.
I don't like him, but I don't deny reality.
Thank youHonestly that was a really poor example and didn't really prove anything.
Sanders deserves the same treatment Romney got. Why not? Do tell.
47% quote out of context. Binders of women.
Nobody in the press cared to look at his record.
Goose. Sanders.
We all know you don't understand polling.... LolHow many folks here have been polled for their opinion of Trump?
The mathematics behind polling allow for a small subset of people to be polled with accuracy to within a small margin of error.Polls....as I've said before, I haven't been polled, nor my wife or son or anyone I know..I don't believe in any poll that has not included the opinions of folks I live around in Oregon. He also has not debated one on one with anyone yet other than moderators and we know how that turned out
When Trump has to debate one on one with a candidate that is actually qualified and informed, it'll plummet like a meteorite
You don't understand the question, but by your posts, you are not viewing this election with a sane mind so I forgive you..but I don't forgive MansonWe all know you don't understand polling.... Lol
In context, he didn't. With pro Obama spin he did.You gotta be kidding me if you don't believe that Mittens WROTE OFF 47% of American voters...
Bull...my opinion matters and I don't have friendsThe mathematics behind polling allow for a small subset of people to be polled with accuracy to within a small margin of error.
It matters not if you specifically, or your biased friends, were polled.
Bull...my opinion matters and I don't have friends
So only Southern Californians who own property countThe mathematics behind polling allow for a small subset of people to be polled with accuracy to within a small margin of error.
It matters not if you specifically, or your biased friends, were polled.
Your question was to try and discredit polling. Meaning, you don't know how the fuck polling worksYou don't understand the question, but by your posts, you are not viewing this election with a sane mind so I forgive you..but I don't forgive Manson
Sigh....So only Southern Californians who own property count
Polls are not accurate..they exclude demographics that don't fit their purpose. I just polled to see who was polled and nobody responded...proof right thereYour question was to try and discredit polling. Meaning, you don't know how the fuck polling works
LOLPolls are not accurate..they exclude demographics that don't fit their purpose. I just polled to see who was polled and nobody responded...proof right there
So only Southern Californians who own property count
FIFYYour question was to try and discredit polling. Meaning, you don't trust polling
