magnifier661
B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2009
- Messages
- 59,328
- Likes
- 5,588
- Points
- 113
I'd vote for uNate Bishop for President 2020!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd vote for uNate Bishop for President 2020!
It will help me and my decriminalization of psychedelics campaignBTW, in the future if any of you run for political office for $50,000 I will go thru your entire posting history and edit or delete anything that could cause you trouble.
If you don't pay me I will still go thru your posting history and sell them to your opponent or the media.
Okay first of all, that's alleged. Second, they were married and this came out when she was going through a divorce. Third, nothing stuck.
So let me ask you this... Did Bernie Sander write this? Is this an allegation or an actual event proven?
BTW, in the future if any of you run for political office for $50,000 I will go thru your entire posting history and edit or delete anything that could cause you trouble.
If you don't pay me I will still go thru your posting history and sell them to your opponent or the media.
It will help me and my campaign to make children use heroin.
Do you have a reading comprehension problem?So you can rape your wife? That's your defense?
Heroin is more legal than weed.Muhahahahaha!
No hypocrisy from us, it's you tying to make nothing into something.The hypocrisy is thick with these liberals
40+ years ago, Charles Manson ordered murders, it's no big deal now because all is forgiven.No hypocrisy from us, it's you tying to make nothing into something.
1) it was 43 years ago.
2) he has never repeated or continued to use that language.
3) the intent of the article was not pro rape but an assertion that submissive/dominant roles are not good for society.
4) Sanders has a very strong history of supporting women's issues and equality issues.
Mags, your thread title is either a lying atempt to be inflammatory or an innocent but totally misguided understanding of what Sanders said. And it's certainly not supportive in any way over the past 42 years.
And by the way, I would likewise forgive any republican for any crass statement 40 years ago as long as they demonstrated a history supporting the more enlightened position.
40+ years ago, Charles Manson ordered murders, it's no big deal now because all is forgiven.
Only because it goes against your argument.smh... Really? Terrible analogy...
Only because it goes against your argument.

You JUST equated actual MURDER to a satire piece... Jesus dude... Your full Mags knows no bounds...
But you said you want psychological profiling for gun owners. You are okay with not giving it to the man who will have control to launch nukes. A man fantasizing rape should be a big red flag on the leader of the free world
This is an all time low mags...WTF? You forgave Charles Manson? Welcome to a club with one member, Manson has lost every appeal for decades40+ years ago, Charles Manson ordered murders, it's no big deal now because all is forgiven.
And you've proven my point. Thank you!This is an all time low mags...WTF? You forgave Charles Manson? Welcome to a club with one member, Manson has lost every appeal for decades
When Trump has to debate one on one with a candidate that is actually qualified and informed, it'll plummet like a meteoriteSilver has a hunch. All the other pundits that have made similar predictions have been wrong so far.
When Silver publishes a statistical analysis that shows Trump losing, it'll have some believability.
But you said you want psychological profiling for gun owners. You are okay with not giving it to the man who will have control to launch nukes. A man fantasizing rape should be a big red flag on the leader of the free world
Great response. So you are for psychological profiling for gun control, but will not support that for the leader of the free world. Double standardYou sure are a piece of work bruh. This is one of the most bullshit posts ever.. You're officially "on one" right now...
Great response. So you are for psychological profiling for gun control, but will not support that for the leader of the free world. Double standard
