Best and Worst Duos- Western Conference

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

THE HCP

NorthEastPortland'sFinest
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
73,073
Likes
62,313
Points
113
Minimum 100 minutes on the court together........You know how important chemistry out on the court is. Amazing that our BEST is barely better than the Spurs WORST!Screen Shot 2015-12-29 at 1.15.29 PM.png
 
Minimum 100 minutes on the court together........You know how important chemistry out on the court is. Amazing that our BEST is barely better than the Spurs WORST!View attachment 7163

Can you please provide the details of this breakdown? I am confused as to hw the two are picked. Obviously Harkless and Aminu are not our best players. I would think CJ/Dame would be our duo? How was this compiled?
 
Any chance we can trade for Duncan and Ginobili? They're getting a little old so we should be able to get them for cheap.
 
Can you please provide the details of this breakdown? I am confused as to hw the two are picked. Obviously Harkless and Aminu are not our best players. I would think CJ/Dame would be our duo? How was this compiled?

You're acting like HCP knows how it was calculated!
 
Any chance we can trade for Duncan and Ginobili? They're getting a little old so we should be able to get them for cheap.

jwMUGNt.jpg
 
You can make stats say whatever you want. Honestly, people have done it. I will say that I do like the Combo of Harkless and Aminu playing together (Aminu at the 4 spot of course).
 
Our best duo hasn't even been given a chance........ Patty C and Kaman!
 
Ha! Good for Papanikolaou. AND Bjelica.

Funny to see the same player in both pairs (Suns, Lakers).
 
Can you please provide the details of this breakdown? I am confused as to hw the two are picked. Obviously Harkless and Aminu are not our best players. I would think CJ/Dame would be our duo? How was this compiled?

Since it indicates 'Net' rating I'm going to guess it is the combination of Offense/Defense rating with the highest 2 selected. Dame/CJ are really high offensively but brutal defensively which is why you see Green/Iggy as the top 'Net' above Curry/Thompson or Curry/Green.

Just a guess....
 
Rating is yes net points per 100 possessions.

CJ & Meyers are highest with a +6.0 in 806 minutes
CJ & Vonleh are lowest with a -3.9 in 826 minutes

Our four lowest duo's all have Noah Vonleh. Lowest non-Vonleh duo is Crabbe & Ed Davis -1.1 in 1094 minutes

Crabbe & Hendo are 2nd +3.2 in 738 minutes
Aminu & CJ are 3rd +3.0 in 1561 minutes
Dame & CJ are 4th +2.7 in 1462 minutes

http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/POR/2016/lineups/
 
I love it that in HCP's original post the third best duo was Jokic/Papanikolaou. And apparently Denver loved the combination so much they waived Papanikolaou.
 
I love it that in HCP's original post the third best duo was Jokic/Papanikolaou. And apparently Denver loved the combination so much they waived Papanikolaou.

Yeah having a +/- stat after 100 minutes has so much random noise its almost meaningless. Once you get to over 500 minutes it does become significant though so its interesting to see now.

I thought it was odd how Dame isn't in any of our top 3 lineups while CJ is in two of them. Sometimes I wonder if CJ will be the superior all around player in a couple years. Fun problem to have.
 
I thought it was odd how Dame isn't in any of our top 3 lineups while CJ is in two of them. Sometimes I wonder if CJ will be the superior all around player in a couple years. Fun problem to have.

Note that Curry is not in GState's best duo...
 
Barton & Jokic is the Nuggets best duo now +7.7 in 637 minutes
Barton & Mudiay is the Nuggest worst with -6.6 in 634 minutes
 
Will the trade machine work on Meyers and Crabbe for Duncan and Ginobili?
 
Note that Curry is not in GState's best duo...

He's damn close. Steph's in 3 of GS 6 best duo's all outscoring opponents by 20+ points.

1. Green & Iggy +24.8 in 948 minutes
3. Steph & Iggy +23.5 in 940 minutes

Dame's in only 2 of our 7 best duo's and 3 of our best 13.
 
Yeah having a +/- stat after 100 minutes has so much random noise its almost meaningless. Once you get to over 500 minutes it does become significant

EXACTLY how I feel about number of posts on here. Rooks opinions mean NOTHING till at least 5,000 posts!
 
EXACTLY how I feel about number of posts on here. Rooks opinions mean NOTHING till at least 5,000 posts!
It's all about the trophy points and Like to post ratio.
 
It's all about the trophy points and Like to post ratio.
Have to argue with you on this. They didn't start this until just recently if I'm not mistaken. Before they were "REP" points I believe and I had 10s of thousands. Those are no longer listed. And why am I responding to you FAMS? See you in a few thousand more posts.
 
Spurs doing to the Warriors exactly what they did to the Blazers. They did not let Lillard beat them. Tonight they are absolutely not going to let Curry beat them.
 
Have to argue with you on this. They didn't start this until just recently if I'm not mistaken. Before they were "REP" points I believe and I had 10s of thousands. Those are no longer listed. And why am I responding to you FAMS? See you in a few thousand more posts.
I guess because now you see i have just as many trophy points and my Like to Post ratio is BUSTIN!
 
Who said that? Did somebody post something?
 
I did want to say that was a great shot you got of Davis last night when he got hurt. Mike B even gave you credit if you didn't catch that.
Thank HBO Boxing for that. When I work the fights, we always have to fly back as fast as we can to find a head butt that caused the cuts over their eyes. It was tough finding that AD injury, but I just looked for him wincing. Got lucky on that one.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top