Schilly
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2009
- Messages
- 3,161
- Likes
- 3,345
- Points
- 113
I would like someone to explain to me why this is a remotely logical synopsis.... I will present to you why I believe it is outlandish.
- The Blazers are already here and the owner has kept them here 28years
- Paul Allen Owns the Stadium
- Seattle Hatres the Blazers the way we hate the Lakers
- There is ZERO interest by the City, County or State in getting an arena built... They just turned down permits for a privately funded Stadium.
- Upgrading market size from Portland to Seattle isn't that big of an upgrade
- He already has a super strong following here, why not steal a few fans from Seattle instead of alienating the existing fanbase in hopes of winning over a sour one.
- He essentially would be cutting his overall market in half.
- By having the Seahawks in one market and the Blazers in the other there can be a marketing plan setup as a "Sports Family" Which taps deeper into both markets.
- He witnessed 1st hand the fallout of the Sonics leaving. Paul Allen likes to be liked and he doesn't want to be "that guy"
- Cost to build a New Stadium + relocate a franchise isn't cheap. OKC already had a stadium built for the Sonics to move into
- All the other 29 owners have to approve the move and there is no outside pressure to to move the Blazers
- There has been little to no effort on behalf of the league to get a team back to Seattle

