Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist email

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Whats up with all these cotton pickin' owners?
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Whats up with all these cotton pickin' owners?
Hey now. My grandparents picked cotton! Don't be goin' and lumping them in with team owners. :tsktsk:
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

You never know what skeletons Paul Allen might have in his closet, but I think he is a very passionate, kind hearted and progressive type person and a great refection of the Portland community. Portland is lucky to have him as the owner of the Blazers.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

honestly, from the bits i've seen it doesn't look 'racist' to me. it's just such a fine emotional and temperamental line - is saying blacks do this, whites do this... based off your own observations, racist now?
can you imagine if white people were at the core of his frustrations? nobody would give a shit.
it's like in the UFC, the current HW champ has a tattoo of 'Brown Pride' across his chest and its cool, brave and proud because he's in an apparent minority. could you imagine the shit that'd blow up if someone like Alexander Gustaffsson (swedish) had 'White Pride' on his chest?

Talking about any minority:
Positively = good
Negatively = racist, negative

Talking about a majority (relative term...):
Positively = racist, hater, oppressive
Negatively = good, trying to change things, bring balance.

Just so fuckin bs all over the place...

I don't know if many people would get their knickersin a twist if someone had an Irish Pride or Italian Pride tattoo, but white pride, yes. Feeling an affinity to your cultural heritage is one thing, but race is another.

People feel proud to belong to a certain "club". That in itself is a little bit lame, but I think saying "white pride" or "brown pride" is racist in that it's implying that people are separate just because of skin color.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

honestly, from the bits i've seen it doesn't look 'racist' to me. it's just such a fine emotional and temperamental line - is saying blacks do this, whites do this... based off your own observations, racist now?
can you imagine if white people were at the core of his frustrations? nobody would give a shit.
it's like in the UFC, the current HW champ has a tattoo of 'Brown Pride' across his chest and its cool, brave and proud because he's in an apparent minority. could you imagine the shit that'd blow up if someone like Alexander Gustaffsson (swedish) had 'White Pride' on his chest?

Talking about any minority:
Positively = good
Negatively = racist, negative

Talking about a majority (relative term...):
Positively = racist, hater, oppressive
Negatively = good, trying to change things, bring balance.

Just so fuckin bs all over the place...

To be fair White pride is associated with some seriously evil people and groups, Brown Pride is basically a really bad tattoo idea for gangbangers lol (not saying Cain is a gangbanger, just saying it was a poor choice in ink).
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Sterling reaped 2-3 times the actual value of his franchise by being "forced" to sell his team to a politically liberal billionaire.

Since when is Ballmer a liberal?

barfo
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

honestly, from the bits i've seen it doesn't look 'racist' to me. it's just such a fine emotional and temperamental line - is saying blacks do this, whites do this... based off your own observations, racist now?
can you imagine if white people were at the core of his frustrations? nobody would give a shit.
it's like in the UFC, the current HW champ has a tattoo of 'Brown Pride' across his chest and its cool, brave and proud because he's in an apparent minority. could you imagine the shit that'd blow up if someone like Alexander Gustaffsson (swedish) had 'White Pride' on his chest?

Talking about any minority:
Positively = good
Negatively = racist, negative

Talking about a majority (relative term...):
Positively = racist, hater, oppressive
Negatively = good, trying to change things, bring balance.

Just so fuckin bs all over the place...

It's racist if you do and racist if you don't. :confused:
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Since when is Ballmer a liberal?

barfo

Since when did facts matter?
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

You never know what skeletons Paul Allen might have in his closet, but I think he is a very passionate, kind hearted and progressive type person and a great refection of the Portland community. Portland is lucky to have him as the owner of the Blazers.

Paul Allen has said hateful things about Apple products. When the NBA starts marketing to hipsters, his ass is gone!
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

To be fair White pride is associated with some seriously evil people and groups, Brown Pride is basically a really bad tattoo idea for gangbangers lol (not saying Cain is a gangbanger, just saying it was a poor choice in ink).

You don't think "brown" gangs are racist against other races?
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Paul Allen has said hateful things about Apple products. When the NBA starts marketing to hipsters, his ass is gone!

Pish, Samsung practically owns the NBA.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

This is no different than what Greg Oden said about Portland.

One city is "too black"

One city is "too white"

One is forced to sell his team.

The other went to South Beach.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Fuck crackaz
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

[video=youtube;yyqeQa-HOv0]
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Can someone enlighten me how a business can have a race/cultural issue and still operate successfully when they can't discuss the problem openly?

To me, pretending the problem doesn't exist and lying to the public is worse than addressing it directly.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

This is no different than what Greg Oden said about Portland.
One city is "too black"
One city is "too white"
One is forced to sell his team.
The other went to South Beach.

Good comparison! Of course, one's a billionaire about to get a hell of a lot richer, and the other's a millionaire who might see jail time.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Can someone enlighten me how a business can have a race/cultural issue and still operate successfully when they can't discuss the problem openly?

To me, pretending the problem doesn't exist and lying to the public is worse than addressing it directly.

Step 1, don't view your fans race as being a problem.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

I don't know if many people would get their knickersin a twist if someone had an Irish Pride or Italian Pride tattoo, but white pride, yes. Feeling an affinity to your cultural heritage is one thing, but race is another.

People feel proud to belong to a certain "club". That in itself is a little bit lame, but I think saying "white pride" or "brown pride" is racist in that it's implying that people are separate just because of skin color.


BlayZa is pretty much spot on. Albeit, I do agree with you Sinobas about saying "white pride" / "brown pride"... but..

Three words... B.E.T

Can you have a W.E.T? Fuck no. Don't even suggest it. Complete hypocrisy. The dude was guilty of being frank, not a racist.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

BlayZa is pretty much spot on. Albeit, I do agree with you Sinobas about saying "white pride" / "brown pride"... but..

Three words... B.E.T

Can you have a W.E.T? Fuck no. Don't even suggest it. Complete hypocrisy. The dude was guilty of being frank, not a racist.

Really? Are you telling me you are having a difficult time finding programing aimed at a white audience?
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Really? Are you telling me you are having a difficult time finding programing aimed at a white audience?

You're missing the point. The point is, the name. Double standard.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

You're missing the point. The point is, the name. Double standard.

So it's the name of the network that you're having a problem with? What would you like to see the name of a network targeted at an African American audience be?
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

So it's the name of the network that you're having a problem with? What would you like to see the name of a network targeted at an African American audience be?


Again you are missing my point. I don't have a problem with any names or programming I could give two shits what is on TV. I am making a point about the double standard that exists today.

My point is that people would be rioting if someone were to create a network called "white entertainment television". And I call that a hypocrisy/double standard.


If the owner was black and exclaiming about how he needs to have more black people show up so he should play music that interest them it would be fine. But the other way around and the guy has to resign. He wasn't being racist, he was being frank about the demographics and spending habits.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Again you are missing my point. I don't have a problem with any names or programming I could give two shits what is on TV. I am making a point about the double standard that exists today.

My point is that people would be rioting if someone were to create a network called "white entertainment television". And I call that a hypocrisy/double standard.

When white programing dominates the major networks there is no need for white entertainment television. What programming would you want to see being aired on a W.E.T. that isn't currently being aired? This double standard you keep talking about would only exist if the major networks only showed black programming and there was little to no entertainment for white people. If that were to happen then you would have a legitimate complaint that there is a double standard, that there isn't a channel called White Entertainment Television.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

When white programing dominates the major networks there is no need for white entertainment television. What programming would you want to see being aired on a W.E.T. that isn't currently being aired? This double standard you keep talking about would only exist if the major networks only showed black programming and there was little to no entertainment for white people. If that were to happen then you would have a legitimate complaint that there is a double standard, that there isn't a channel called White Entertainment Television.


I don't give a shit about the content or what you think dominates the networks. Based solely off the name, the fact still remains that a channel named Black Entertainment Television is a double standard. Nobody in this current society could create a channel named W.E.T because people would claim racism, even if the network mixed even numbers of white/blacks in it. It's all in the name, not the content.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

Based solely off the name, the fact still remains that a channel named Black Entertainment Television is a double standard. It's all in the name, not the content.

So you're offended that there is a TV network with Black in the title because you can't have a TV network with White in the title? You have no problem with the Entertainment part or the Television it's just the Black part you're having a huge issue with? Some how that's not fair to you, to white people, to... You don't get to watch a TV network with the word White somewhere in its title. Content and programming doesn't matter, just the name. Am I understanding you correctly?

So where would you like to go with this? In your opinion what would be the answer to this travesty? It's not a content thing with you, it's a name thing. Would you like to see Black Entertainment Television change their name? Or is this only about you not being able to have a network called White Entertainment Television?
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

So you're offended that there is a TV network with Black in the title because you can't have a TV network with White in the title? You have no problem with the Entertainment part or the Television it's just the Black part you're having a huge issue with? Some how that's not fair to you, to white people, to... You don't get to watch a TV network with the word White somewhere in its title. Content and programming doesn't matter, just the name. Am I understanding you correctly?

So where would you like to go with this? In your opinion what would be the answer to this travesty? It's not a content thing with you, it's a name thing. Would you like to see Black Entertainment Television change their name? Or is this only about you not being able to have a network called White Entertainment Television?

I will answer your questions in order:

1. I'm not offended, mad, upset. I am merely making a statement/observation. Not sure why you continue to think I am emotionally vested in this.

2. I have no problem with ANY of the names, however, there is a double standard if someone were to make a channel named White Entertainment Television. Do you not admit that?

3. You're statement about what I think is fair or unfair is confusing. Multiple times I have stated my point of a double standard. I have said nothing about it being 'fair' or 'unfair' to any race. I said that if someone (anyone for that matter) were to create a channel named "White Entertainment TV" it would be deemed racist, however "Black Entertainment TV" is not. You keep thinking I am trying to support a cause, when in fact I am merely stating a double standard exists, and agreed with BlayZa's first post.

4. I would like to go to St. Martin

5. The names could change that would be fine, or people could relax on the whole black/white thing. I don't care either way, the double standard still exists at this time though.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

I thought the Hallmark Channel was pretty much the white people channel, or is that CMT?
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

If a double standard is going to be pointed out in the television industry, one should also recognize that while ABC, NBC and CBS aren't called white television entertainment, the shows and actors and actresses on the shows are predominately white and not representative of the diversity in the community.
 
Re: Bruce Levenson will sell the Atlanta Hawks after revelation of a 2012 racist emai

I will answer your questions in order:

1. I'm not offended, mad, upset. I am merely making a statement/observation. Not sure why you continue to think I am emotionally vested in this.

2. I have no problem with ANY of the names, however, there is a double standard if someone were to make a channel named White Entertainment Television. Do you not admit that?

3. You're statement about what I think is fair or unfair is confusing. Multiple times I have stated my point of a double standard. I have said nothing about it being 'fair' or 'unfair' to any race. I said that if someone (anyone for that matter) were to create a channel named "White Entertainment TV" it would be deemed racist, however "Black Entertainment TV" is not. You keep thinking I am trying to support a cause, when in fact I am merely stating a double standard exists, and agreed with BlayZa's first post.

4. I would like to go to St. Martin

5. The names could change that would be fine, or people could relax on the whole black/white thing. I don't care either way, the double standard still exists at this time though.

When you're argument comes down to one word and one word only there is no double standard. B.E.T. targets a specific audience. El Rey just started up this past year, its target audience are Hispanic people who don't speak Spanish. "El Rey (Spanish for The King) is an English language American television channel targeting Latino audiences." It's a network for people like HCP. Is that racist? Is it okay because they don't call it the Latinos who only speak English Entertainment Network? No, they are targeting a specific audience. Just like B.E.T. is. Just like a lot of existing networks are targeting white audiences. You keep saying there is a double standard but there isn't.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top