California governor signs stringent new gun control laws

[Minstrel]

You misread the result.

This is another reason to vote for Trump. This ruling did not set a precedent, not a full court.

I know that no precedent was set in that particular case, that but as the part I bolded said, "it is part of a trend in which the justices have given at least tacit approval to broad gun-control laws in states and localities that choose to enact them."

And "the right to bear arms" is already restricted, because there are many weapons you can't legally have, like NBC (nuclear/biological/chemical) weapons. The interpretation of the Constitution determines how much restriction is allowed, not whether or not restrictions are possible.

 

[MarAzul]

I know that no precedent was set in that particular case, that but as the part I bolded said, "it is part of a trend in which the justices have given at least tacit approval to broad gun-control laws in states and localities that choose to enact them."

And "the right to bear arms" is already restricted, because there are many weapons you can't legally have, like NBC (nuclear/biological/chemical) weapons. The interpretation of the Constitution determines how much restriction is allowed, not whether or not restrictions are possible.

Hell that agreement was reach many years ago. The only difference now is the court has lost some logical thinkers. Perhaps fixed shortly.

 

[MARIS61]

Considering the Supreme Court didn't throw out Connecticut's new gun control laws, it's unlikely that California's will get nixed. There's nothing unconstitutional about these laws...they're ones that could be adopted federally if Congress agreed on them. States can certainly put them into effect on a state level.

The second amendment prevents complete bans on guns...it says nothing about things like background checks or what types of guns or magazines must be publicly available.

That is some wacky stuff you're spouting there.

You do realize The Second Amendment is available for all to read and see that your entire post is utter nonsense possibly derived fromand based on an overindulgence of Disney movies, SALON, and Huffington Post blogs?

The Second Amendment quite clearly and succinctly forbids the enactment and/or enforcement of any government control, delay, alteration, prevention, limitation... of any American citizen's right to bear arms.

 

[Minstrel]

That is some wacky stuff you're spouting there.

You do realize The Second Amendment is available for all to read and see that your entire post is utter nonsense possibly derived fromand based on an overindulgence of Disney movies, SALON, and Huffington Post blogs?

The Second Amendment quite clearly and succinctly forbids the enactment and/or enforcement of any government control, delay, alteration, prevention, limitation... of any American citizen's right to bear arms.

You'll need to petition the Supreme Court to watch fewer Disney movies and read less Salon and HuffPo blogs, not me.

 

[MarAzul]

That is some wacky stuff you're spouting there.

You do realize The Second Amendment is available for all to read and see that your entire post is utter nonsense possibly derived fromand based on an overindulgence of Disney movies, SALON, and Huffington Post blogs?

The Second Amendment quite clearly and succinctly forbids the enactment and/or enforcement of any government control, delay, alteration, prevention, limitation... of any American citizen's right to bear arms.

I take it you are in favor of making him First Mate on the next shot to Mars. I marked it down.