OT Censoring Post!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Cup would like MarAzul gone.
Chris Craig would agree to the same.
dviss would not complain.

Why would they need SlyPokerdog?

River could like every post made.

I don'want you gone. I want to have actual intellectual conversations, not immature arguments.
 
Yes yes, I now. Fuck our President, fuck our Flag, fuck our traditions.
You have painted your picture. It is unmistakable.

And that is his God given opinion

You have also painted yours. @dviss1 s painting is more colorful.
 
More like a lack, not God.
But later.

Your saying he is not allowed an opinion? Or in the least that he lacks one. That sounds like a personal insult.
 
Yes yes, I now. Fuck our President, fuck our Flag, fuck our traditions.
You have painted your picture. It is unmistakable.

Glad I can live in a country where that type of speech is protected. I'm sure when you were cursing out and hating Obama, you probably said some shit about him too. :dunno:
 
"GO FUCK YOURSELF" isn't a personal attack? What the fuck is it then? A making for a new Hallmark Greeting Card? That is pure bullshit

It is. I have had similar posts edited during the playoffs. It was changed to "your post can go fuck itself."

Pretty sure that's a personal insult. :dunno:

If you think that is worse than GTFO, the tag @SlyPokerDog or @PtldPlatypus and have them delete it.
I shall not complain.

Of course it is. Now they say it isn't. Up is down, grass is blue and the sky is green.

"Get the fuck outta here" is actually a term of endearment and, when said with proper inflection, can be funny.

"Go fuck yourself" can never use this distinction.

You know, I don't consider myself some omniscient authority (that's Sly's sub-title); I'm more than willing to accommodate if the consensus disagrees with me. I said I personally don't consider "GFY" to be a personal attack--because I view "personal attack" to be a comment about another's personal characteristics, rather than just flinging profanity in a person's general direction--but if y'all want to say it is, I can go along to get along. I will go ahead and edit that post for you all.
 
You know, I don't consider myself some omniscient authority (that's Sly's sub-title); I'm more than willing to accommodate if the consensus disagrees with me. I said I personally don't consider "GFY" to be a personal attack, but if y'all want to say it is, I can go along to get along. I will go ahead and edit that post for you all.

edit that post

edit that post

edit that post

edit that post

:chestbump: :clap:
 
You know, I don't consider myself some omniscient authority (that's Sly's sub-title); I'm more than willing to accommodate if the consensus disagrees with me. I said I personally don't consider "GFY" to be a personal attack--because I view "personal attack" to be a comment about another's personal characteristics, rather than just flinging profanity in a person's general direction--but if y'all want to say it is, I can go along to get along. I will go ahead and edit that post for you all.
Whoa whoa whoa. I take it back. Never even knew general profanity at someone else was allowed.

I got all kinds of different profanity I can fling at people.
 
Ha!
I have you know! It does surprise the hell out of me that you guys don't understand it. It is not a stat, it is metadata used by coaches such as Coach Gill, and Newell. More I suspect. I suspect that Dr. Jack may have also. His completely different two squad offense relied on a PG too with the best A/M in the TrailBlazer history to run his part of the offense.
Dave Twardzik came in and ran a completely different offense from the Walton high post, near Princeton offense when Walton went to the bench. As I recall Dave's A/M was 1.47 the year the Blazers won the Championship. That is much higher than any other Blazer PG, much higher than the best starting PG, Rod Stricklands 1.27.
Perhaps someday you will catch on, but... I doubt it.

So you name 2 coaches from the 18th century that supposedly used it, lol. Have you heard anyone from modern day basketball ever use it and do you have any proof? Twardzik also wouldn't start in today's NBA and back on the championship team, the guy only shot 5.8 times while only dishing out 3.3 assists. Hardly numbers to get excited abou and why some obscure medadata point hardly paints much of a picture.
 
So you name 2 coaches from the 18th century that supposedly used it, lol. Have you heard anyone from modern day basketball ever use it and do you have any proof? Twardzik also wouldn't start in today's NBA and back on the championship team, the guy only shot 5.8 times while only dishing out 3.3 assists. Hardly numbers to get excited abou and why some obscure medadata point hardly paints much of a picture.
Take this fucking basketball crap out of here. Now I will fling random profanities at you. I think I'm too late but maybe if I still say "your post is" before I just start typing more F bombs and attacks on you I'll get away with it.
 
Yes! I'm glad you feel that way. I want you to have such a nice day that I was going to suggest you have @HCP hang out with you and have a nice day too. Together. Then take turns having a nice day alone.
I now want the niceness of your day turned up to 11.
 
As I recall, I made a comparison of dviss to the woman piss about being late for closing time wanting special treatment because she was Black. It seems quite accurate to me as part of the debate about whether the complaint was reasonable. I am sure @dviss has an opinion very much different than mine. I see no reason it should not be solicited.

This was the response I got from @Strenuus,


No rule broke, but in essence, he did not permit my opinion to be voice in a forum were the purpose is to make comparison and give opinions on current events.

Seems very arbitrary and total just the opinion of the Mod. If dviss agreed or disagreed, is not unhealthy.

You have expressed your opinion. I don't agree with it. Suprise suprise! Did you read my above post where I started the conversation without comparing @dviss1 to the woman. Why exactly do you think it fits that conversation? How is it condusive? You were trying to say that the Black woman like @dviss1 and therefore all black people want special privelages because they are black. That is false logic. It is an untrue statement in my opinion. Why do you think this, that all black people want special treatment? Where does that come from?

The mod didn't change it because he agreed or disagreed with you. He saw you were trying to bait @dviss1 and start a flame war which if you read the rules you would know that is not taken kindly to around these parts.
 
Last edited:
You have expressed your opinion. I don't agree with it. Suprise suprise! Did you read my above post where I started the conversation without comparing @dviss1 to the woman. Why exactly do think it fits that conversation? How is it condusive? You were trying to say that Black woman like @dviss1 and therfore all black people want special privelages because they are black. That is false logic. It is an untrue statement in my opinion. Why do think this, that all black people want special treatment? Where does that come from?

The mod didn't change it because he agreed or disagreed with you. He saw you were trying to bait @dviss1 and start a flame war which if you read the rules you would know is not taken kindly to around these parts.
You and your reason and logic can have a nice day too.
 
I just wanna make this as clear as I can. If @dviss1 goes I'll probably disappear. This place would be as boring as hell.

I don't know if I believe this unless fucking with me is your favorite forum pastime and it'd be boring here if you didn't have the opportunity to do it...
 
I don't know if I believe this unless fucking with me is your favorite forum pastime and it'd be boring here if you didn't have the opportunity to do it...

That's just it. They just want to fuck with you and bait you and anyone else who won't suck Trump's cock. They don't want to have the conversation. They claim they do and then time and time again its the same old shit, different day.
 
You and your reason and logic can have a nice day too.

Oh, I and they will. You better believe it. Its going to be a very nice day. Very nice. Bigly.
 
I don't know if I believe this unless fucking with me is your favorite forum pastime and it'd be boring here if you didn't have the opportunity to do it...
BINGO!!!!!!!!!!

Only because you keeeeeep saying you don't fall for it but you ALWAYS fall for it.
 
That's just it. They just want to fuck with you and bait you and anyone else who won't suck Trump's cock. They don't want to have the conversation. They claim they do and then time and time again its the same old shit, different day.
I don't care about Trump. You really need to take notes and keep track.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top