Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually Granger is older than Iguodala.
And you don't want Granger? Wow!
Oh comon man. Everybody who watches Travis knows he is the 2 to 3 bad game for 1 good game type of player. Averages mean nothing for him. Half of the games he doesn't even show up. You could give him all the extra minutes you want, but if his shot isn't falling, or he isn't mentally into the game, he isn't going to score anymore. Then go look at Gays box scores and you will see he shows up every night. He doesn't shoot 15% 2 nights in a row and then shoot 80% the next. He shoot in the mid forties most nights of the week. Consistently.
He also has something else the Blazers could use a little of: Attitude and physicality.
Portland has too many nice guys. They need to get a little nasty going.
This year, in 52 games Travis had 27 games he scored in double digits.
I took his game log points and extrapolated each game to Rudy Gay's average minutes. I got 41 games out of the 52 where he scored in double-digits - and unlike Gay - he is not the #1 or #2 option on his team - he is usually the 3rd or 4th option.
Sorry - but this argument just does not carry real water if you actually take the data and extrapolate - Rudy Gay is playing a lot worse this year as the #2 option to Mayo on his team then he did last year. Think of how he will fit as the 3rd or 4th option on Portland - and I just do not see where, given his current form - he is any better than Travis. He just isn't - he is a less efficient scorer who is a lot more prone to turn-overs.
He also has something else the Blazers could use a little of: Attitude and physicality.
So my question is, does Gay bring more to the table than just scoring? I'm not really interested in adding someone who only scores.
Some of the potential trades posted on this thread might be some of the funniest things I have ever read.
