Rastapopoulos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 42,471
- Likes
- 26,882
- Points
- 113
This guy certainly rates Asik highly. So does Tom Thibodeau. So does this guy (but it's Bleacher Report, so it doesn't count).
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If LA loses Howard, who will be their center? They won't have a lot of options? Sometimes the Lakers will take what they can get.
Steve Blake is not exactly showtime.
Maybe. But when the Lakers got Shaq, Orlando did not get Vlade. I don't see the Lakers ever agreeing on a sign-and-trade. They'll dare Houston to try to sign Howard away.
No, but he was signed as a complementary player in a time when they thought they had a championship-contending roster. He wasn't replacing an All-NBA player.
I think the Lakers are prohibited from a S&T since they are so high above the luxury tax. We would just have to hope that Houston wanted to deal Asik's salary away if they acquired Howard, which seeing as their GM is a wheeler and dealer type probably would for picks/young assets.
They could always amnesty gasol though and be safe

So: given Patrick Beverley's emergence and his comparatively anemic season (and a playoffs where the only time Houston won was when he didn't play), I wonder if Houston will want to package Lin with Asik. Dumping both would give them ample room to go after Howard, woudn't it? And maybe sign up Maynor, who used to come off the bench with Harden in OKC. Any way we could absorb both Lin and Asik's contracts? (Maybe re-route Lin to LA for Steve Blake back...)
Yes. Because two in the bush is better than a bird in hand.
1.) Atlanta resigns smith and signs Howard outright.
My point is that Houston has Asik. Why trade him away for a chance to get Howard? Why not play him with Howard (twin towers) if they can sign him?
That would NOT work. You need ONE big who can shoot outside of three feet. Asik does not complement Howard at all.
For $5M, they have a great insurance policy and backup C. They don't need a big who can shoot outside of three feet. They'd have two DPOY candidates instead. They'd also have a C who could put up 25/game to go with Harden who does likewise. They also have two guys (Harden, Parsons) who put up about 900 3pt shots between them (more than 10/game), along with Lin's 250. I don't think they need more outside shooting.
If they're going to trade him, it'd be for a really good player on a similar $5M contract. Or wait a year and trade him for a player with a similar $15M contract.
I show Asik making 8.3 million/yr
I think the contract sites are averaging the contract. You will notice every year says 8.3 something.
If I recall the contract was something like 5 MIL for year 1, 5 Mil for year 2 and 15 MIL for year 3.
Is that possible? I thought at most you can have a 25% raise. 5 mil to 15 mil is a huge jump. That's 300%
Is that possible? I thought at most you can have a 25% raise. 5 mil to 15 mil is a huge jump. That's 300%
it's part of the gilbert arenas rule, can only start at MLE level for first 2 years, but can average whatever cap space a team had.
I think the contract sites are averaging the contract. You will notice every year says 8.3 something.
If I recall the contract was something like 5 MIL for year 1, 5 Mil for year 2 and 15 MIL for year 3.
Question: are we under the cap enough to absorb Asik's salary? Could we do a #10 for Asik trade? (Whether or not we'd want to - I would - is another matter.)
